Characterization of treatment patterns and outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients in Sweden.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kelvin H M Kwok, Ahmad Abbadi, Sarah Côté, Simona Baculea, Samuel Spigelman, Markus Aly, Frida Schain
{"title":"Characterization of treatment patterns and outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients in Sweden.","authors":"Kelvin H M Kwok, Ahmad Abbadi, Sarah Côté, Simona Baculea, Samuel Spigelman, Markus Aly, Frida Schain","doi":"10.2340/sju.v60.43875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), prognosis remains poor with high rates of progression and risk for mortality. To better understand the current treatment landscape, this study aims to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for MIBC patients in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using population-based registers and electronic medical records, patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) were identified between January 2016 and December 2020 in the Skåne region in Sweden. Patients with de novo MIBC and those who progressed from high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer were included. Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), metastatic rate, event-free survival (EFS), and bladder-intact EFS (BI-EFS) were described.  Results: Among the 231 MIBC patients identified, 34% received only best supportive care (BSC) primarily due to age and comorbidity. Of the 153 patients who received curative treatment, 84 (55%) underwent radical cystectomy (RC) and 69 (45%) received bladder-sparing treatment. Patients who received bladder-sparing treatment were older, had poorer health status, and more comorbidities. Among RC-treated patients, 5-year OS and EFS were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61-83%) and 70% (95% CI: 58-79%), respectively. Among patients who received bladder-sparing treatment, 5-year OS and BI-EFS were 52% (95% CI: 38-64%) and 34% (95% CI: 21-48%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Old age and high rates of comorbidities among the MIBC patient population meant many patients were ineligible for recommended RC and instead received bladder-sparing treatment or BSC only. High rates of progression and poor survival were observed in both patients undergoing RC and patients who received bladder-sparing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"60 ","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v60.43875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: For patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), prognosis remains poor with high rates of progression and risk for mortality. To better understand the current treatment landscape, this study aims to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for MIBC patients in Sweden.

Materials and methods: Using population-based registers and electronic medical records, patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) were identified between January 2016 and December 2020 in the Skåne region in Sweden. Patients with de novo MIBC and those who progressed from high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer were included. Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), metastatic rate, event-free survival (EFS), and bladder-intact EFS (BI-EFS) were described.  Results: Among the 231 MIBC patients identified, 34% received only best supportive care (BSC) primarily due to age and comorbidity. Of the 153 patients who received curative treatment, 84 (55%) underwent radical cystectomy (RC) and 69 (45%) received bladder-sparing treatment. Patients who received bladder-sparing treatment were older, had poorer health status, and more comorbidities. Among RC-treated patients, 5-year OS and EFS were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61-83%) and 70% (95% CI: 58-79%), respectively. Among patients who received bladder-sparing treatment, 5-year OS and BI-EFS were 52% (95% CI: 38-64%) and 34% (95% CI: 21-48%), respectively.

Conclusions: Old age and high rates of comorbidities among the MIBC patient population meant many patients were ineligible for recommended RC and instead received bladder-sparing treatment or BSC only. High rates of progression and poor survival were observed in both patients undergoing RC and patients who received bladder-sparing treatment.

瑞典肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的治疗模式和预后特征
目的:肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者预后差,进展率高,死亡风险高。为了更好地了解当前的治疗情况,本研究旨在描述瑞典MIBC患者的现实世界治疗模式和临床结果。材料和方法:使用基于人群的登记册和电子医疗记录,在2016年1月至2020年12月期间在瑞典skamatne地区确定了MIBC (T2-4aN0M0)患者。包括新发MIBC患者和从高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌进展的患者。描述了治疗模式、总生存期(OS)、转移率、无事件生存期(EFS)和膀胱完整EFS (BI-EFS)。结果:在确定的231例MIBC患者中,34%的患者仅接受了最佳支持治疗(BSC),主要原因是年龄和合并症。153例接受根治性治疗的患者中,84例(55%)接受了根治性膀胱切除术(RC), 69例(45%)接受了保膀胱治疗。接受保膀胱治疗的患者年龄较大,健康状况较差,合并症较多。在接受rc治疗的患者中,5年OS和EFS分别为74%(95%可信区间[CI]: 61-83%)和70% (95% CI: 58-79%)。在接受膀胱保留治疗的患者中,5年OS和BI-EFS分别为52% (95% CI: 38-64%)和34% (95% CI: 21-48%)。结论:在MIBC患者群体中,年龄和高合并症发生率意味着许多患者不符合推荐的RC,而是接受保膀胱治疗或仅接受BSC。在接受RC和保留膀胱治疗的患者中,观察到高进展率和低生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信