Do Theory of Mind and Mental Time Travel abilities build on joint cognitive foundations?

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241960
Lydia Paulin Schidelko, Leonie Baumann, Marina Proft, Hannes Rakoczy
{"title":"Do Theory of Mind and Mental Time Travel abilities build on joint cognitive foundations?","authors":"Lydia Paulin Schidelko, Leonie Baumann, Marina Proft, Hannes Rakoczy","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Higher cognition is special in that it goes beyond representing the here and now. Two relevant forms of such thinking are <i>Theory of Mind</i> (ToM) that enables us to represent others' perspectives, and <i>Mental Time Travel</i> (MTT) that enables us to represent other points in time. The present studies investigate how these capacities are related in development. Do they build on the same cognitive foundations and thus emerge together? Do higher-order forms of the two abilities rely on analogous recursive embedding and thus progress in parallel and coordinated ways? We addressed these questions in four studies with 3- to 9-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 395). ToM was operationalized as first-, second- and third-order false belief understanding. MTT was operationalized as reasoning about future possibilities (first-order), counterfactual reasoning (second-order) and anticipating counterfactual emotions (third-order). Study 1 shows a stepwise development of both ToM and MTT and a moderate consistency of performance patterns. However, across all four studies, we did not find robust correlations between first-, second- and third-order tasks of ToM and MTT, respectively. Overall, these results show stepwise and parallel trajectories in ToM and MTT, but do not provide stringent evidence for a joint cognitive foundation of the two capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 6","pages":"241960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher cognition is special in that it goes beyond representing the here and now. Two relevant forms of such thinking are Theory of Mind (ToM) that enables us to represent others' perspectives, and Mental Time Travel (MTT) that enables us to represent other points in time. The present studies investigate how these capacities are related in development. Do they build on the same cognitive foundations and thus emerge together? Do higher-order forms of the two abilities rely on analogous recursive embedding and thus progress in parallel and coordinated ways? We addressed these questions in four studies with 3- to 9-year-old children (N = 395). ToM was operationalized as first-, second- and third-order false belief understanding. MTT was operationalized as reasoning about future possibilities (first-order), counterfactual reasoning (second-order) and anticipating counterfactual emotions (third-order). Study 1 shows a stepwise development of both ToM and MTT and a moderate consistency of performance patterns. However, across all four studies, we did not find robust correlations between first-, second- and third-order tasks of ToM and MTT, respectively. Overall, these results show stepwise and parallel trajectories in ToM and MTT, but do not provide stringent evidence for a joint cognitive foundation of the two capacities.

心智理论和心理时间旅行能力建立在共同的认知基础上吗?
高级认知的特殊之处在于它超越了对此时此地的表征。这种思维的两种相关形式是心灵理论(ToM),它使我们能够代表他人的观点,以及精神时间旅行(MTT),它使我们能够代表其他时间点。目前的研究调查了这些能力在发展中的关系。它们是否建立在相同的认知基础上,从而一起出现?这两种能力的高阶形式是否依赖于类似的递归嵌入,从而以并行和协调的方式发展?我们在4项针对3- 9岁儿童(N = 395)的研究中解决了这些问题。ToM被操作为一阶、二阶和三阶错误信念理解。MTT被操作化为对未来可能性的推理(一阶)、反事实推理(二阶)和预测反事实情绪(三阶)。研究1显示ToM和MTT的逐步发展以及性能模式的适度一致性。然而,在所有四项研究中,我们没有发现ToM和MTT的一阶、二阶和三阶任务之间分别存在强大的相关性。总的来说,这些结果显示了ToM和MTT的逐步平行轨迹,但并没有为这两种能力的共同认知基础提供严格的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信