Free Flap Salvage Using Extracorporeal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration: A Comparative Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006856
Anna Johansen, Martin Halle, Stina Rittri
{"title":"Free Flap Salvage Using Extracorporeal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Anna Johansen, Martin Halle, Stina Rittri","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flap thrombosis is a challenging complication in free flap surgery, which if untreated will lead to flap failure. Besides mechanical thrombectomy, the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in flap salvage surgery remains uncertain. We hypothesized that extracorporeal tPA administration combined with surgical revision would lead to fewer flap necroses without increased bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study involving 1308 free flaps was conducted, including 42 patients who underwent surgical revision due to established flap thrombosis. The administration of tPA was analyzed in relation to the outcome variables: total and partial flap necrosis, secondary blood transfusion, and exploration for a hematoma or a new thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients received tPA during reexploration, and 20 patients did not. In the tPA group, 9 (41%) total flap failures occurred, and 4 (18%) flaps experienced partial flap necrosis. By comparison, in the tPA naive group, there were 4 (20%) total flap failures and 2 (10%) with partial flap necrosis (not significant). No differences were found in terms of the need for blood transfusion, secondary reexploration for bleeding, or a new thrombosis between the tPA and tPA naive groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find that tPA reduced the risk for flap necrosis, nor did it increase the risk for secondary bleeding-related adverse effects. We believe that there was a selection bias toward more severely compromised flaps receiving tPA. We consider extracorporeally administrated tPA in the flap to be safe and a valuable tool in flap salvage surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flap thrombosis is a challenging complication in free flap surgery, which if untreated will lead to flap failure. Besides mechanical thrombectomy, the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in flap salvage surgery remains uncertain. We hypothesized that extracorporeal tPA administration combined with surgical revision would lead to fewer flap necroses without increased bleeding complications.

Methods: A retrospective study involving 1308 free flaps was conducted, including 42 patients who underwent surgical revision due to established flap thrombosis. The administration of tPA was analyzed in relation to the outcome variables: total and partial flap necrosis, secondary blood transfusion, and exploration for a hematoma or a new thrombosis.

Results: Twenty-two patients received tPA during reexploration, and 20 patients did not. In the tPA group, 9 (41%) total flap failures occurred, and 4 (18%) flaps experienced partial flap necrosis. By comparison, in the tPA naive group, there were 4 (20%) total flap failures and 2 (10%) with partial flap necrosis (not significant). No differences were found in terms of the need for blood transfusion, secondary reexploration for bleeding, or a new thrombosis between the tPA and tPA naive groups.

Conclusions: We did not find that tPA reduced the risk for flap necrosis, nor did it increase the risk for secondary bleeding-related adverse effects. We believe that there was a selection bias toward more severely compromised flaps receiving tPA. We consider extracorporeally administrated tPA in the flap to be safe and a valuable tool in flap salvage surgery.

应用体外组织纤溶酶原激活剂修复游离皮瓣的比较研究。
背景:皮瓣血栓形成是游离皮瓣手术中一个具有挑战性的并发症,如果不及时治疗将导致皮瓣衰竭。除机械取栓外,组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)溶栓治疗在皮瓣保留手术中的潜在益处仍不确定。我们假设体外给药tPA结合手术翻修可以减少皮瓣坏死而不增加出血并发症。方法:回顾性研究1308个游离皮瓣,包括42例因皮瓣血栓形成而行手术修复的患者。分析tPA的使用与结局变量的关系:皮瓣全部和部分坏死,二次输血,血肿或新血栓的探查。结果:22例患者在再探查期间接受了tPA治疗,20例患者未接受tPA治疗。在tPA组中,9个(41%)皮瓣全部失效,4个(18%)皮瓣部分坏死。相比之下,在tPA初始组中,有4例(20%)皮瓣完全失效,2例(10%)皮瓣部分坏死(无统计学意义)。tPA组和tPA初始组在输血需求、出血二次探查或新血栓形成方面没有发现差异。结论:我们没有发现tPA降低皮瓣坏死的风险,也没有增加继发性出血相关不良反应的风险。我们认为,有一种选择偏向于更严重受损皮瓣接受tPA。我们认为体外给药tPA在皮瓣保留手术中是安全的和有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信