{"title":"Free Flap Salvage Using Extracorporeal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Anna Johansen, Martin Halle, Stina Rittri","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flap thrombosis is a challenging complication in free flap surgery, which if untreated will lead to flap failure. Besides mechanical thrombectomy, the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in flap salvage surgery remains uncertain. We hypothesized that extracorporeal tPA administration combined with surgical revision would lead to fewer flap necroses without increased bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study involving 1308 free flaps was conducted, including 42 patients who underwent surgical revision due to established flap thrombosis. The administration of tPA was analyzed in relation to the outcome variables: total and partial flap necrosis, secondary blood transfusion, and exploration for a hematoma or a new thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients received tPA during reexploration, and 20 patients did not. In the tPA group, 9 (41%) total flap failures occurred, and 4 (18%) flaps experienced partial flap necrosis. By comparison, in the tPA naive group, there were 4 (20%) total flap failures and 2 (10%) with partial flap necrosis (not significant). No differences were found in terms of the need for blood transfusion, secondary reexploration for bleeding, or a new thrombosis between the tPA and tPA naive groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find that tPA reduced the risk for flap necrosis, nor did it increase the risk for secondary bleeding-related adverse effects. We believe that there was a selection bias toward more severely compromised flaps receiving tPA. We consider extracorporeally administrated tPA in the flap to be safe and a valuable tool in flap salvage surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Flap thrombosis is a challenging complication in free flap surgery, which if untreated will lead to flap failure. Besides mechanical thrombectomy, the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in flap salvage surgery remains uncertain. We hypothesized that extracorporeal tPA administration combined with surgical revision would lead to fewer flap necroses without increased bleeding complications.
Methods: A retrospective study involving 1308 free flaps was conducted, including 42 patients who underwent surgical revision due to established flap thrombosis. The administration of tPA was analyzed in relation to the outcome variables: total and partial flap necrosis, secondary blood transfusion, and exploration for a hematoma or a new thrombosis.
Results: Twenty-two patients received tPA during reexploration, and 20 patients did not. In the tPA group, 9 (41%) total flap failures occurred, and 4 (18%) flaps experienced partial flap necrosis. By comparison, in the tPA naive group, there were 4 (20%) total flap failures and 2 (10%) with partial flap necrosis (not significant). No differences were found in terms of the need for blood transfusion, secondary reexploration for bleeding, or a new thrombosis between the tPA and tPA naive groups.
Conclusions: We did not find that tPA reduced the risk for flap necrosis, nor did it increase the risk for secondary bleeding-related adverse effects. We believe that there was a selection bias toward more severely compromised flaps receiving tPA. We consider extracorporeally administrated tPA in the flap to be safe and a valuable tool in flap salvage surgery.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.