Unilateral approach to bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a large series and a proposed grading system to predict technical difficulties.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Servet Inci, Sacide Kalaycioglu
{"title":"Unilateral approach to bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a large series and a proposed grading system to predict technical difficulties.","authors":"Servet Inci, Sacide Kalaycioglu","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03634-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study includes the surgical treatment of 31 patients with bilateral MCA (bMCA) aneurysms using a unilateral approach and is the second largest series in the literature. The main aim of this study is to present a proposed grading system to preoperatively predict the difficulties in this approach. The clinical files, radiological studies, operation records, intraoperative video recordings, complications and outcomes of 31 patients were retrospectively reviewed. In the first part of this study (2001-2010), we operated on 22 patients with bMCA aneurysms and were able to clip the contralateral aneurysm via unilateral approach in only 12 cases (54.5%). Considering our experience from the surgery of these patients, we identified 5 parameters that reveal surgical difficulties. In the second part of the study (2011-2023), considering these 5 parameters, 20 patients were selected for unilateral approach and bilateral aneurysms could be clipped in 19 patients (95%). As a result, 26 of 31 patients (83.9%) were discharged with a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2, excellent-good). Intraoperative rupture occurred in one patient. Based on our experience, we developed a grading system with a total of 10 points by assigning points according to the degree of difficulty of each parameter and classified surgical difficulty as follows: 0-1 low difficulty, 2-3 moderate difficulty, 4-6 high difficulty and 7-10 very high difficulty. Patients with bMCA aneurysms can be operated via unilateral approach in experienced hands in properly selected cases. This grading system may help the neurosurgeon in this selection by preoperatively predicting intraoperative difficulties. This study is a completely retrospective file scan. This is not a clinical trial. Clinical trial number: not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03634-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study includes the surgical treatment of 31 patients with bilateral MCA (bMCA) aneurysms using a unilateral approach and is the second largest series in the literature. The main aim of this study is to present a proposed grading system to preoperatively predict the difficulties in this approach. The clinical files, radiological studies, operation records, intraoperative video recordings, complications and outcomes of 31 patients were retrospectively reviewed. In the first part of this study (2001-2010), we operated on 22 patients with bMCA aneurysms and were able to clip the contralateral aneurysm via unilateral approach in only 12 cases (54.5%). Considering our experience from the surgery of these patients, we identified 5 parameters that reveal surgical difficulties. In the second part of the study (2011-2023), considering these 5 parameters, 20 patients were selected for unilateral approach and bilateral aneurysms could be clipped in 19 patients (95%). As a result, 26 of 31 patients (83.9%) were discharged with a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2, excellent-good). Intraoperative rupture occurred in one patient. Based on our experience, we developed a grading system with a total of 10 points by assigning points according to the degree of difficulty of each parameter and classified surgical difficulty as follows: 0-1 low difficulty, 2-3 moderate difficulty, 4-6 high difficulty and 7-10 very high difficulty. Patients with bMCA aneurysms can be operated via unilateral approach in experienced hands in properly selected cases. This grading system may help the neurosurgeon in this selection by preoperatively predicting intraoperative difficulties. This study is a completely retrospective file scan. This is not a clinical trial. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

双侧大脑中动脉瘤的单侧入路:一个大的系列和一个建议的分级系统来预测技术困难。
本研究包括采用单侧入路手术治疗31例双侧MCA (bMCA)动脉瘤,是文献中第二大系列研究。本研究的主要目的是提出一个建议的分级系统,以在手术前预测这种方法的困难。回顾性分析31例患者的临床资料、影像学检查、手术记录、术中录像、并发症及转归。在本研究的第一部分(2001-2010)中,我们对22例bMCA动脉瘤患者进行了手术,其中只有12例(54.5%)能够通过单侧入路夹闭对侧动脉瘤。考虑到我们对这些患者的手术经验,我们确定了5个显示手术困难的参数。在研究的第二部分(2011-2023)中,考虑到这5个参数,选择20例患者行单侧入路,其中19例(95%)可夹闭双侧动脉瘤。结果31例患者中26例(83.9%)出院时预后良好(mRS 0-2,优-良)。术中破裂1例。根据我们的经验,我们制定了一个总分为10分的评分系统,根据每个参数的难易程度打分,将手术难度分为:0-1低难度,2-3中等难度,4-6高难度,7-10非常高难度。bMCA动脉瘤患者可以在适当选择的病例中由经验丰富的手通过单侧入路手术。该评分系统可以通过术前预测术中困难来帮助神经外科医生进行选择。这项研究是一个完全回顾性的文件扫描。这不是临床试验。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信