Tracing the Trajectory of Charles Manson's Interpersonal Dynamics: A Longitudinal Moment-to-Moment Analysis Using Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID).

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erika Fanti, Alexandra L Halberstadt, A Esin Asan, Aaron L Pincus
{"title":"Tracing the Trajectory of Charles Manson's Interpersonal Dynamics: A Longitudinal Moment-to-Moment Analysis Using Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID).","authors":"Erika Fanti, Alexandra L Halberstadt, A Esin Asan, Aaron L Pincus","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2515576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charles Manson, notorious for his involvement in the gruesome Tate-LaBianca murders of 1969, remains a polarizing figure. His case has divided not only the public but also clinicians and researchers, resulting in a wide array of diagnoses from personality disorders to schizophrenia. To shed light on this longstanding debate, this study employs a novel approach to systematically assess moment-to-moment dyadic interpersonal exchanges between Manson and several interviewers over a 21-year span. Utilizing Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID), we analyzed seven video-recorded interviews of Manson from 1972 to 1993. Unified Structural Equation Modeling revealed a consistent pattern of dominant and cold interpersonal behavior. Manson demonstrated high agency (dominance) and low communion (warmth) across all interactions but also the capacity for strategic interpersonal behaviors and goal-directed communication, contrasting with disorganized patterns typically associated with schizophrenia. Simulation Modeling Analysis revealed a progressive intensification and rigidity of dominant-cold interpersonal patterns over time. Our findings suggest that Manson's interpersonal style aligns more with severe personality pathology, particularly features of malignant narcissism, rather than a primary psychotic disorder. The study offers a new methodology to investigate complex cases of severe psychopathology and highlights the potential of assessing momentary interpersonal processes in forensic and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2515576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Charles Manson, notorious for his involvement in the gruesome Tate-LaBianca murders of 1969, remains a polarizing figure. His case has divided not only the public but also clinicians and researchers, resulting in a wide array of diagnoses from personality disorders to schizophrenia. To shed light on this longstanding debate, this study employs a novel approach to systematically assess moment-to-moment dyadic interpersonal exchanges between Manson and several interviewers over a 21-year span. Utilizing Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID), we analyzed seven video-recorded interviews of Manson from 1972 to 1993. Unified Structural Equation Modeling revealed a consistent pattern of dominant and cold interpersonal behavior. Manson demonstrated high agency (dominance) and low communion (warmth) across all interactions but also the capacity for strategic interpersonal behaviors and goal-directed communication, contrasting with disorganized patterns typically associated with schizophrenia. Simulation Modeling Analysis revealed a progressive intensification and rigidity of dominant-cold interpersonal patterns over time. Our findings suggest that Manson's interpersonal style aligns more with severe personality pathology, particularly features of malignant narcissism, rather than a primary psychotic disorder. The study offers a new methodology to investigate complex cases of severe psychopathology and highlights the potential of assessing momentary interpersonal processes in forensic and clinical settings.

追踪查尔斯·曼森人际动力学的轨迹:基于人际动力学连续评估(CAID)的纵向时刻到时刻分析。
查尔斯·曼森因卷入1969年骇人听闻的泰特-拉比安卡谋杀案而臭名昭著,他仍然是一个两极分化的人物。他的病例不仅引起了公众的分歧,而且引起了临床医生和研究人员的分歧,导致了从人格障碍到精神分裂症的各种诊断。为了阐明这一长期存在的争论,本研究采用了一种新颖的方法,系统地评估了曼森和几位采访者在21年的时间里时刻到时刻的二元人际交流。利用CAID (Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics)对Manson在1972 - 1993年间的7次访谈录像进行了分析。统一结构方程模型揭示了显性和冷性人际行为的一致模式。Manson在所有的互动中都表现出高能动性(支配性)和低共融性(温暖性),但也表现出策略性人际行为和目标导向沟通的能力,这与精神分裂症典型的无组织模式形成鲜明对比。模拟建模分析显示,随着时间的推移,主导-冷人际模式逐渐强化和僵化。我们的研究结果表明,曼森的人际交往风格更符合严重的人格病理学,尤其是恶性自恋的特征,而不是原发性精神病。该研究提供了一种新的方法来调查复杂的严重精神病理学病例,并强调了在法医和临床环境中评估瞬间人际关系过程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信