Subcutaneously Administered Anesthetics and Analgesics for Pain Management: An Integrative Review.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Bruno D'Paula Andrade, William Caracas Moreira, Roger Rodrigues da Silva, Ticiane Santana Gomes Santiago, Emilio Carlos Del Massa
{"title":"Subcutaneously Administered Anesthetics and Analgesics for Pain Management: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Bruno D'Paula Andrade, William Caracas Moreira, Roger Rodrigues da Silva, Ticiane Santana Gomes Santiago, Emilio Carlos Del Massa","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2516521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article aims to summarize evidence regarding subcutaneously administered anesthetics and analgesics and their effects on pain management. Searches were conducted in September 2023 by a paired review in the MEDLINE database via the Virtual Health Library (BVS) and SCOPUS via Elsevier. Study selection was independently performed by two researchers according to inclusion criteria: primary studies, published in any language, and without temporal restriction. Duplicates, irrelevant studies, and those outside the research scope were excluded, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The final sample for the review comprised 45 articles, predominantly clinical trials with eligible patients, published between 1982 and 2022. Key drug classes identified in the evaluation of subcutaneous administration for pain management included amide and amino-amide anesthetics, opioids, and adjuvant agents (such as anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensives, and catecholamines). Primary advantages noted were reduced postoperative opioid use, effective analgesic control in postoperative settings, adjuvant efficacy in intraoperative settings and invasive exams, fewer cognitive side effects compared to other anesthesia types, decreased coughing, and shorter hospitalization and ambulation times. Disadvantages included subcutaneous bupivacaine's poor adjuvant performance when combined with general anesthesia, tissue necrosis associated with tumescent anesthesia technique, and ambiguity regarding postoperative respiratory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2516521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to summarize evidence regarding subcutaneously administered anesthetics and analgesics and their effects on pain management. Searches were conducted in September 2023 by a paired review in the MEDLINE database via the Virtual Health Library (BVS) and SCOPUS via Elsevier. Study selection was independently performed by two researchers according to inclusion criteria: primary studies, published in any language, and without temporal restriction. Duplicates, irrelevant studies, and those outside the research scope were excluded, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The final sample for the review comprised 45 articles, predominantly clinical trials with eligible patients, published between 1982 and 2022. Key drug classes identified in the evaluation of subcutaneous administration for pain management included amide and amino-amide anesthetics, opioids, and adjuvant agents (such as anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensives, and catecholamines). Primary advantages noted were reduced postoperative opioid use, effective analgesic control in postoperative settings, adjuvant efficacy in intraoperative settings and invasive exams, fewer cognitive side effects compared to other anesthesia types, decreased coughing, and shorter hospitalization and ambulation times. Disadvantages included subcutaneous bupivacaine's poor adjuvant performance when combined with general anesthesia, tissue necrosis associated with tumescent anesthesia technique, and ambiguity regarding postoperative respiratory function.

皮下注射麻醉药和镇痛药治疗疼痛:综合综述。
这篇文章的目的是总结关于皮下给药的麻醉药和镇痛药及其对疼痛管理的影响的证据。检索于2023年9月通过虚拟健康图书馆(BVS)在MEDLINE数据库和通过爱思唯尔的SCOPUS进行配对综述。研究选择由两名研究人员根据纳入标准独立进行:主要研究,以任何语言发表,没有时间限制。排除重复、不相关的研究和研究范围之外的研究,差异由第三方审稿人解决。该综述的最终样本包括45篇文章,主要是1982年至2022年间发表的符合条件的患者的临床试验。评估皮下给药对疼痛管理的关键药物类别包括酰胺和氨基酰胺麻醉剂、阿片类药物和辅助剂(如抗炎药、抗高血压药和儿茶酚胺)。主要优点是减少了术后阿片类药物的使用,术后有效的镇痛控制,术中辅助检查的效果,与其他麻醉类型相比,认知副作用更少,咳嗽减少,住院和走动时间更短。缺点包括皮下布比卡因与全身麻醉联合时辅助效果差,肿胀麻醉技术导致组织坏死,术后呼吸功能不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信