Management of Tunnel Infection Following Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Submucosal Tunneling Procedures.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shao-Bin Luo, Li Wang, Zu-Qiang Liu, Yi-Qun Zhang, Wei-Feng Chen, Li-Li Ma, Jian-Wei Hu, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou
{"title":"Management of Tunnel Infection Following Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Submucosal Tunneling Procedures.","authors":"Shao-Bin Luo, Li Wang, Zu-Qiang Liu, Yi-Qun Zhang, Wei-Feng Chen, Li-Li Ma, Jian-Wei Hu, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tunnel infection is a rare but major adverse event after endoscopic submucosal tunneling procedures (ESTPs), which is scarcely reported. This study aims to offer a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation and management of tunnel infection following ESTP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From August 2010 to December 2023, we retrospectively analyzed 4398 patients with achalasia receiving peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and 2214 patients with upper gastrointestinal tumors receiving submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). Patients diagnosed with postoperative tunnel infection were included, and the various treatments utilized for managing these infections and outcomes were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 cases of ESTP tunnel infection in patients (10 men; median age 47 years). Among the patients, nine underwent POEM and eight underwent STER. With similar baseline characteristics between two groups after PSM, the tunnel infection group of POEM showed higher rate of mucosal injury (44.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.029) and the tunnel infection group of STER showed larger tumor size (3.3 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p = 0.036). The treatment of tunnel infection included insertion of a gastric tube into the tunnel for drainage (nine cases), tunnel mucosal incision (eight cases), and tunnel flushing (seven cases), and no patient required surgical intervention. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics to control the infection. A total of three individuals required thoracic drainage for reactive pleural effusion. The median post-infection hospital stay was 18 days (range 5-38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive management approach demonstrated its effectiveness, and tunnel infection was successfully treated without requiring subsequent surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Tunnel infection is a rare but major adverse event after endoscopic submucosal tunneling procedures (ESTPs), which is scarcely reported. This study aims to offer a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation and management of tunnel infection following ESTP.

Method: From August 2010 to December 2023, we retrospectively analyzed 4398 patients with achalasia receiving peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and 2214 patients with upper gastrointestinal tumors receiving submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). Patients diagnosed with postoperative tunnel infection were included, and the various treatments utilized for managing these infections and outcomes were documented.

Results: There were 17 cases of ESTP tunnel infection in patients (10 men; median age 47 years). Among the patients, nine underwent POEM and eight underwent STER. With similar baseline characteristics between two groups after PSM, the tunnel infection group of POEM showed higher rate of mucosal injury (44.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.029) and the tunnel infection group of STER showed larger tumor size (3.3 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p = 0.036). The treatment of tunnel infection included insertion of a gastric tube into the tunnel for drainage (nine cases), tunnel mucosal incision (eight cases), and tunnel flushing (seven cases), and no patient required surgical intervention. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics to control the infection. A total of three individuals required thoracic drainage for reactive pleural effusion. The median post-infection hospital stay was 18 days (range 5-38).

Conclusions: This comprehensive management approach demonstrated its effectiveness, and tunnel infection was successfully treated without requiring subsequent surgical interventions.

上消化道内镜下粘膜下隧道手术后隧道感染的处理。
目的:隧道感染是内镜下粘膜下隧道手术(ESTPs)后罕见但主要的不良事件,很少有报道。本研究旨在对ESTP后隧道感染的评估与管理进行综合分析。方法:2010年8月至2023年12月,回顾性分析4398例经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)的贲门失弛缓症患者和2214例经黏膜下隧道内镜切除(STER)的上消化道肿瘤患者。被诊断为术后隧道感染的患者包括在内,并记录了用于管理这些感染的各种治疗方法和结果。结果:患者中ESTP隧道感染17例(男性10例;中位年龄47岁)。其中9例行POEM, 8例行STER。PSM后两组基线特征相似,POEM隧道感染组粘膜损伤率更高(44.4%比11.1%,p = 0.029), STER隧道感染组肿瘤大小更大(3.3 cm比2.3 cm, p = 0.036)。隧道感染的治疗包括胃管插入隧道引流(9例)、隧道粘膜切开(8例)和隧道冲洗(7例),无患者需要手术干预。所有患者均接受广谱抗生素治疗以控制感染。共有3例患者因反应性胸腔积液需要胸腔引流。感染后住院时间中位数为18天(范围5-38天)。结论:这种综合管理方法证明了其有效性,隧道感染成功治疗,无需后续手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信