Clinical uptake of an antigen-based approach to membranous nephropathy: a survey of general nephrologists and glomerular disease experts.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Eibhlin Goggins, Andrew DeLaat, Bryce Barr, Jonathan Taliercio, Ali Mehdi, Georges Nakhoul, Brendan Bowman, Corey Cavanaugh
{"title":"Clinical uptake of an antigen-based approach to membranous nephropathy: a survey of general nephrologists and glomerular disease experts.","authors":"Eibhlin Goggins, Andrew DeLaat, Bryce Barr, Jonathan Taliercio, Ali Mehdi, Georges Nakhoul, Brendan Bowman, Corey Cavanaugh","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02313-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been an emergence of new antigens discovered in membranous nephropathy (MN). Whether these antigens have impacted the approach to, and management of, MN patients undertaken by nephrologists is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional international survey pertaining to 13 antigens recently discovered in MN. The survey was distributed by the National Kidney Foundation, direct emails, and social media.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>PLA2R, THSD7A, NELL1, and EXT1/2 testing were readily available while the most common response for other antigen testing was 'Not Performed' or 'Unknown'. All respondents had tested for or treated PLA2R-positive MN. Of 79 respondents, only 12.7% had treated THSD7A, 15.2% for NELL1 and 6.3% for EXT1/2 positive MN. For PLA2R, THSD7A, and NELL1, a majority chose rituximab (75.4, 87.5, and 80.0%, respectively) as initial treatment, and would treat with immunosuppression before completing 6 months of conservative therapy. A majority of respondents would routinely or occasionally omit a kidney biopsy in the setting of positive serum anti-PLA2R antibodies, however, 27.5% would rarely do so. There was no clear consensus across respondents regarding the use of anti-PLA2R serum levels in determining remission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although many new MN antigens have been discovered, there is limited availability of tests identifying these less common antigens. While the survey suggests potential for utilization of an antigen-tailored approach based on identified differences in screening and treatment practices, there remains a lag in the full adoption of this new information. Further progress in accessibility of antigen testing and research into antigen associations will enable a more individualized approach to the management of MN.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02313-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been an emergence of new antigens discovered in membranous nephropathy (MN). Whether these antigens have impacted the approach to, and management of, MN patients undertaken by nephrologists is still unclear.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional international survey pertaining to 13 antigens recently discovered in MN. The survey was distributed by the National Kidney Foundation, direct emails, and social media.

Result: PLA2R, THSD7A, NELL1, and EXT1/2 testing were readily available while the most common response for other antigen testing was 'Not Performed' or 'Unknown'. All respondents had tested for or treated PLA2R-positive MN. Of 79 respondents, only 12.7% had treated THSD7A, 15.2% for NELL1 and 6.3% for EXT1/2 positive MN. For PLA2R, THSD7A, and NELL1, a majority chose rituximab (75.4, 87.5, and 80.0%, respectively) as initial treatment, and would treat with immunosuppression before completing 6 months of conservative therapy. A majority of respondents would routinely or occasionally omit a kidney biopsy in the setting of positive serum anti-PLA2R antibodies, however, 27.5% would rarely do so. There was no clear consensus across respondents regarding the use of anti-PLA2R serum levels in determining remission.

Conclusion: Although many new MN antigens have been discovered, there is limited availability of tests identifying these less common antigens. While the survey suggests potential for utilization of an antigen-tailored approach based on identified differences in screening and treatment practices, there remains a lag in the full adoption of this new information. Further progress in accessibility of antigen testing and research into antigen associations will enable a more individualized approach to the management of MN.

一种基于抗原的膜性肾病治疗方法的临床应用:对普通肾病学家和肾小球疾病专家的调查。
背景:近年来,在膜性肾病(MN)中发现了新的抗原。这些抗原是否影响了肾病学家对MN患者的治疗方法和管理尚不清楚。方法:我们对最近在MN中发现的13种抗原进行了横断面国际调查。该调查由美国国家肾脏基金会通过直接电子邮件和社交媒体发布。结果:PLA2R、THSD7A、NELL1和EXT1/2检测是现成的,而其他抗原检测最常见的反应是“未执行”或“未知”。所有应答者都接受过pla2r阳性MN检测或治疗。在79名应答者中,只有12.7%的人治疗了THSD7A, 15.2%的人治疗了NELL1, 6.3%的人治疗了EXT1/2阳性MN。对于PLA2R、THSD7A和NELL1,大多数患者选择利妥昔单抗(分别为75.4、87.5和80.0%)作为初始治疗,并在完成6个月的保守治疗前进行免疫抑制治疗。在血清抗pla2r抗体阳性的情况下,大多数应答者会常规或偶尔省略肾活检,然而,27.5%的应答者很少这样做。对于使用抗pla2r血清水平来确定缓解,受访者之间没有明确的共识。结论:虽然已经发现了许多新的MN抗原,但鉴定这些不常见抗原的检测方法有限。虽然调查表明,根据筛查和治疗实践中已确定的差异,有可能采用针对抗原的方法,但在充分采用这一新信息方面仍存在滞后。抗原检测的可及性和抗原相关性研究的进一步进展将使MN的管理更加个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信