Keeran Vickneson, Ali Gharaviri, Vinush Vigneswaran, Johanna Tonko, Neil Bodagh, Magdalena Klis, Irum Kotadia, Matthew Wright, David E Newby, Marc R Dweck, Michelle C Williams, Mark O'Neill, John Whitaker, Steven E Williams
{"title":"Peri-Atrial Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Atrial Fibrillation: Quantification of Electrophysiological Effects Using Electroanatomic Mapping.","authors":"Keeran Vickneson, Ali Gharaviri, Vinush Vigneswaran, Johanna Tonko, Neil Bodagh, Magdalena Klis, Irum Kotadia, Matthew Wright, David E Newby, Marc R Dweck, Michelle C Williams, Mark O'Neill, John Whitaker, Steven E Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peri-atrial adipose tissue is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Increased peri-atrial adipose volume and attenuation, detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA), have been observed in patients with AF. However, the electrophysiological correlates of both peri-atrial adipose tissue volume and attenuation are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to investigate the spatial relationship between peri-atrial adipose tissue, peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation, and atrial electrophysiological remodeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardiac CTA was performed in 37 control subjects and 44 patients with AF. Left atrial bipolar voltage and conduction velocity were co-registered with cardiac CTA-derived peri-atrial adipose tissue segmentations. Mean adipose tissue volume and attenuation were compared with local voltage and conduction velocity measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peri-atrial adipose tissue volume was greater in patients with AF (20.9 cm<sup>3</sup> vs 14.2 cm<sup>3</sup>; adjusted odds ratio: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.24), independent of left atrial volume indexed to body mass index, left atrial mass, age, sex, sleep apnea, and coronary heart disease. In patients with AF, areas with the highest burden of peri-atrial adipose tissue had lower voltage (1.75 ± 1.72 mV vs 2.11 ± 2.02 mV; P < 0.001) and conduction velocity (0.627 ± 0.55 ms<sup>-1</sup> vs 0.683 ± 0.48 ms<sup>-1</sup>; P < 0.001), compared with areas with the lowest burden of peri-atrial adipose tissue. Mean peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation was similar in both groups. In patients with AF, low peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation was weakly correlated with reduced bipolar voltage (1.69 ± 1.68 mV vs 2.16 ± 2.07 mV; P < 0.001) and conduction velocity (0.615 ± 0.47 ms<sup>-1</sup> vs 0.684 ± 0.43 ms<sup>-1</sup>; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peri-atrial adipose tissue volume was greater in patients with AF. Increased peri-atrial adipose tissue burden and reduced attenuation were spatially but weakly correlated with adverse electrophysiological remodeling in patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.04.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Peri-atrial adipose tissue is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Increased peri-atrial adipose volume and attenuation, detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA), have been observed in patients with AF. However, the electrophysiological correlates of both peri-atrial adipose tissue volume and attenuation are unknown.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the spatial relationship between peri-atrial adipose tissue, peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation, and atrial electrophysiological remodeling.
Methods: Cardiac CTA was performed in 37 control subjects and 44 patients with AF. Left atrial bipolar voltage and conduction velocity were co-registered with cardiac CTA-derived peri-atrial adipose tissue segmentations. Mean adipose tissue volume and attenuation were compared with local voltage and conduction velocity measurements.
Results: Peri-atrial adipose tissue volume was greater in patients with AF (20.9 cm3 vs 14.2 cm3; adjusted odds ratio: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.24), independent of left atrial volume indexed to body mass index, left atrial mass, age, sex, sleep apnea, and coronary heart disease. In patients with AF, areas with the highest burden of peri-atrial adipose tissue had lower voltage (1.75 ± 1.72 mV vs 2.11 ± 2.02 mV; P < 0.001) and conduction velocity (0.627 ± 0.55 ms-1 vs 0.683 ± 0.48 ms-1; P < 0.001), compared with areas with the lowest burden of peri-atrial adipose tissue. Mean peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation was similar in both groups. In patients with AF, low peri-atrial adipose tissue attenuation was weakly correlated with reduced bipolar voltage (1.69 ± 1.68 mV vs 2.16 ± 2.07 mV; P < 0.001) and conduction velocity (0.615 ± 0.47 ms-1 vs 0.684 ± 0.43 ms-1; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Peri-atrial adipose tissue volume was greater in patients with AF. Increased peri-atrial adipose tissue burden and reduced attenuation were spatially but weakly correlated with adverse electrophysiological remodeling in patients with AF.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.