Comparison of a Comprehensive Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) Screen in Whole Blood with Conventional Immunoassay-Based Techniques.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jessica Ayala, Sarah Kerrigan
{"title":"Comparison of a Comprehensive Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) Screen in Whole Blood with Conventional Immunoassay-Based Techniques.","authors":"Jessica Ayala, Sarah Kerrigan","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional immunoassay (IA)-based drug screens are limited in their scope of analysis and specificity. Their reliance on the cross-reactivity of antibody reagents is a limiting factor, particularly in light of the emergence of new therapeutics, emerging drugs, and new psychoactive substances (NPS). High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based techniques can offer improved versatility, specificity, and increase the scope of analytical testing. In this study, a validated HRMS screening procedure was used to reanalyze adjudicated blood samples previously tested by immunoassay. IA methods employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme multiplied immunotechnique (EMIT®). The comprehensive HRMS screen utilized supported liquid extraction (SLE) and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Specimens previously tested by IA were reanalyzed using the HRMS screen following long term storage. The LC-QTOF-MS toxicology screen produced an additional 709 positive drug findings (67 compounds) among a population of 919 previously analyzed blood specimens. This study highlights the analytical benefits of MS-based toxicological screening and the advantages of data acquisition modalities that permit retrospective data interrogation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional immunoassay (IA)-based drug screens are limited in their scope of analysis and specificity. Their reliance on the cross-reactivity of antibody reagents is a limiting factor, particularly in light of the emergence of new therapeutics, emerging drugs, and new psychoactive substances (NPS). High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based techniques can offer improved versatility, specificity, and increase the scope of analytical testing. In this study, a validated HRMS screening procedure was used to reanalyze adjudicated blood samples previously tested by immunoassay. IA methods employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme multiplied immunotechnique (EMIT®). The comprehensive HRMS screen utilized supported liquid extraction (SLE) and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Specimens previously tested by IA were reanalyzed using the HRMS screen following long term storage. The LC-QTOF-MS toxicology screen produced an additional 709 positive drug findings (67 compounds) among a population of 919 previously analyzed blood specimens. This study highlights the analytical benefits of MS-based toxicological screening and the advantages of data acquisition modalities that permit retrospective data interrogation.

液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(LC-QTOF-MS)筛查全血与常规免疫分析技术的比较
传统的基于免疫测定(IA)的药物筛选在分析范围和特异性方面受到限制。他们对抗体试剂的交叉反应性的依赖是一个限制因素,特别是在新疗法、新药物和新精神活性物质(NPS)出现的情况下。基于高分辨率质谱(HRMS)的技术可以提供更好的通用性、特异性,并增加分析测试的范围。在这项研究中,一种经过验证的HRMS筛选程序被用于重新分析先前通过免疫分析法检测的判定血液样本。IA方法采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和酶倍增免疫技术(EMIT®)。综合HRMS筛选采用支持液萃取(SLE)和液相色谱四极杆飞行时间质谱(LC-QTOF-MS)。以前用IA检测的标本在长期储存后使用HRMS筛查重新分析。LC-QTOF-MS毒理学筛选在先前分析的919个血液样本中产生了另外709个阳性药物发现(67种化合物)。本研究强调了基于ms的毒理学筛选的分析优势和允许回顾性数据询问的数据获取方式的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信