Comparison of a Comprehensive Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) Screen in Whole Blood with Conventional Immunoassay-Based Techniques.
{"title":"Comparison of a Comprehensive Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) Screen in Whole Blood with Conventional Immunoassay-Based Techniques.","authors":"Jessica Ayala, Sarah Kerrigan","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional immunoassay (IA)-based drug screens are limited in their scope of analysis and specificity. Their reliance on the cross-reactivity of antibody reagents is a limiting factor, particularly in light of the emergence of new therapeutics, emerging drugs, and new psychoactive substances (NPS). High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based techniques can offer improved versatility, specificity, and increase the scope of analytical testing. In this study, a validated HRMS screening procedure was used to reanalyze adjudicated blood samples previously tested by immunoassay. IA methods employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme multiplied immunotechnique (EMIT®). The comprehensive HRMS screen utilized supported liquid extraction (SLE) and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Specimens previously tested by IA were reanalyzed using the HRMS screen following long term storage. The LC-QTOF-MS toxicology screen produced an additional 709 positive drug findings (67 compounds) among a population of 919 previously analyzed blood specimens. This study highlights the analytical benefits of MS-based toxicological screening and the advantages of data acquisition modalities that permit retrospective data interrogation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional immunoassay (IA)-based drug screens are limited in their scope of analysis and specificity. Their reliance on the cross-reactivity of antibody reagents is a limiting factor, particularly in light of the emergence of new therapeutics, emerging drugs, and new psychoactive substances (NPS). High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based techniques can offer improved versatility, specificity, and increase the scope of analytical testing. In this study, a validated HRMS screening procedure was used to reanalyze adjudicated blood samples previously tested by immunoassay. IA methods employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme multiplied immunotechnique (EMIT®). The comprehensive HRMS screen utilized supported liquid extraction (SLE) and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Specimens previously tested by IA were reanalyzed using the HRMS screen following long term storage. The LC-QTOF-MS toxicology screen produced an additional 709 positive drug findings (67 compounds) among a population of 919 previously analyzed blood specimens. This study highlights the analytical benefits of MS-based toxicological screening and the advantages of data acquisition modalities that permit retrospective data interrogation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.