Predictive Modeling of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug and Herb-Drug Interactions in Oncology: Insights From PBPK Studies.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
International Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1177/10915818251345116
Enes Emre Taş, Kutlu O Ulgen
{"title":"Predictive Modeling of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug and Herb-Drug Interactions in Oncology: Insights From PBPK Studies.","authors":"Enes Emre Taş, Kutlu O Ulgen","doi":"10.1177/10915818251345116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is increasingly used to anticipate, quantify, and strategically manage drug-drug (DDI) and herb-drug (HDI) interactions that can alter the exposure of chemotherapy agents together with co-administered phytochemicals or nutraceuticals. To evaluate current knowledge, we performed a comprehensive Google Scholar search (2003-2024) and selected studies that employed PBPK platforms, reported quantitative validation, and focused on chemotherapy-related interactions. From these reports, key modeling parameters, validation metrics, and clinically relevant outcomes were extracted, and then the information was synthesized to identify common trends. Collectively, the evidence indicates that unintended changes in drug exposure-most often mediated by CYP3A4 inhibition or induction-may modify efficacy, toxicity, and overall anticancer response; nevertheless, PBPK models reproduce these effects with high accuracy, and emerging AI-enhanced approaches promise even finer precision. Accordingly, our synthesis underscores how PBPK modeling can help clinicians forecast interaction risk, individualize dosing, and avert therapeutic failure, especially in polypharmacy settings. Integrating these models into routine oncology practice therefore offers a proactive path toward safer, more personalized chemotherapy and, ultimately, better patient outcomes within an increasingly complex therapeutic landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"424-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251345116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is increasingly used to anticipate, quantify, and strategically manage drug-drug (DDI) and herb-drug (HDI) interactions that can alter the exposure of chemotherapy agents together with co-administered phytochemicals or nutraceuticals. To evaluate current knowledge, we performed a comprehensive Google Scholar search (2003-2024) and selected studies that employed PBPK platforms, reported quantitative validation, and focused on chemotherapy-related interactions. From these reports, key modeling parameters, validation metrics, and clinically relevant outcomes were extracted, and then the information was synthesized to identify common trends. Collectively, the evidence indicates that unintended changes in drug exposure-most often mediated by CYP3A4 inhibition or induction-may modify efficacy, toxicity, and overall anticancer response; nevertheless, PBPK models reproduce these effects with high accuracy, and emerging AI-enhanced approaches promise even finer precision. Accordingly, our synthesis underscores how PBPK modeling can help clinicians forecast interaction risk, individualize dosing, and avert therapeutic failure, especially in polypharmacy settings. Integrating these models into routine oncology practice therefore offers a proactive path toward safer, more personalized chemotherapy and, ultimately, better patient outcomes within an increasingly complex therapeutic landscape.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肿瘤药物动力学-药物和草药-药物相互作用的预测模型:来自PBPK研究的见解。
基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型越来越多地用于预测、量化和战略性地管理药物-药物(DDI)和草药-药物(HDI)相互作用,这些相互作用可以改变化疗药物与共同施用的植物化学物质或营养药品的暴露。为了评估目前的知识,我们进行了全面的谷歌学者检索(2003-2024),并选择了使用PBPK平台的研究,报告了定量验证,并专注于化疗相关的相互作用。从这些报告中提取关键建模参数、验证指标和临床相关结果,然后综合信息以确定共同趋势。总的来说,证据表明药物暴露的意外变化-通常由CYP3A4抑制或诱导介导-可能改变疗效,毒性和整体抗癌反应;然而,PBPK模型以高精度再现了这些效应,新兴的人工智能增强方法有望达到更高的精度。因此,我们的综合研究强调了PBPK模型如何帮助临床医生预测相互作用风险,个性化给药,避免治疗失败,特别是在多药环境中。因此,将这些模型整合到常规肿瘤实践中,为更安全、更个性化的化疗提供了积极的途径,并最终在日益复杂的治疗环境中获得更好的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信