Retrospective study of compliance and persistence of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ashley N Bowyer, Jessica M Meekins, Eduarda M Bortoluzzi, Amy J Rankin
{"title":"Retrospective study of compliance and persistence of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital.","authors":"Ashley N Bowyer, Jessica M Meekins, Eduarda M Bortoluzzi, Amy J Rankin","doi":"10.2460/javma.25.03.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate compliance and persistence of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of medical records from dogs examined by the Ophthalmology Service at Kansas State University from April 2022 through July 2024, prescribed at least 1 topical ophthalmic medication, and returned for 1 recheck examination. Medication compliance and persistence (MCP) was reported by clients and evaluated at the client level and individual drug level. A general linear model and χ2 tests were used to analyze variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 273 of 381 (72%) of clients administered all medications as prescribed and 496 of 592 (79%) individual medications were given as prescribed. Factors significantly associated with MCP included appointment type (P = .002), medication frequency (P = .006), recheck interval (P = .002), and recheck compliance (P = .002). Patients presented to other services had reduced odds of MCP when compared to appointments directly with the Ophthalmology Service (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.57). Odds of MCP were lower with a recheck interval > 30 days (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.62) and a prescribed frequency > 4 times daily (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.61). Immunomodulatory and glaucoma drugs had a significantly higher MCP rate (92% P = .02 and 89% P = .04, respectively), while lubricants had a lower MCP rate (70% P = .04). Depletion of medication supply was the most common reason for non-MCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type, frequency, and access to medication, appointment type, and recheck factors influenced MCP in this population.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Shorter recheck intervals and providing an adequate supply of medication may improve MCP of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.03.0132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate compliance and persistence of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs.

Methods: Retrospective review of medical records from dogs examined by the Ophthalmology Service at Kansas State University from April 2022 through July 2024, prescribed at least 1 topical ophthalmic medication, and returned for 1 recheck examination. Medication compliance and persistence (MCP) was reported by clients and evaluated at the client level and individual drug level. A general linear model and χ2 tests were used to analyze variables.

Results: Overall, 273 of 381 (72%) of clients administered all medications as prescribed and 496 of 592 (79%) individual medications were given as prescribed. Factors significantly associated with MCP included appointment type (P = .002), medication frequency (P = .006), recheck interval (P = .002), and recheck compliance (P = .002). Patients presented to other services had reduced odds of MCP when compared to appointments directly with the Ophthalmology Service (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.57). Odds of MCP were lower with a recheck interval > 30 days (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.62) and a prescribed frequency > 4 times daily (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.61). Immunomodulatory and glaucoma drugs had a significantly higher MCP rate (92% P = .02 and 89% P = .04, respectively), while lubricants had a lower MCP rate (70% P = .04). Depletion of medication supply was the most common reason for non-MCP.

Conclusions: Type, frequency, and access to medication, appointment type, and recheck factors influenced MCP in this population.

Clinical relevance: Shorter recheck intervals and providing an adequate supply of medication may improve MCP of topical ophthalmic medications prescribed to dogs.

某兽医教学医院对犬局部眼科用药依从性和持久性的回顾性研究。
目的:评价犬局部眼科用药的依从性和持久性。方法:回顾性分析2022年4月至2024年7月在堪萨斯州立大学眼科服务中心检查的犬的医疗记录,开具至少1种局部眼科药物,并返回1次复查。用药依从性和持续性(MCP)由患者报告,并在患者层面和个体药物层面进行评估。采用一般线性模型和χ2检验进行变量分析。结果:总体而言,381名患者中有273名(72%)按规定服用了所有药物,592名患者中有496名(79%)按规定服用了个别药物。与MCP显著相关的因素包括预约类型(P = 0.002)、用药频率(P = 0.006)、复检间隔(P = 0.002)和复检依从性(P = 0.002)。与直接预约眼科服务相比,到其他服务机构就诊的患者患MCP的几率降低(OR, 0.22;95% CI, 0.08 ~ 0.57)。复查时间间隔为30天时,发生MCP的几率较低(OR, 0.31;95% CI, 0.15至0.62)和规定频率>每天4次(OR, 0.27;95% CI, 0.12 ~ 0.61)。免疫调节剂和青光眼药物具有较高的MCP率(分别为92% P = 0.02和89% P = 0.04),而润滑剂具有较低的MCP率(70% P = 0.04)。药物供应不足是导致非mcp的最常见原因。结论:用药类型、用药频率和可及性、预约类型和复诊因素影响该人群的MCP。临床相关性:缩短复查间隔和提供足够的药物供应可能会改善给狗开的局部眼科药物的MCP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信