Real-time automatic detection of gynecological laparoscopic surgical instruments and exploration in surgical skills assessment application: a cross-sectional study.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Huanyu Wei, Li Deng, Xueju Wu, Wenwei Tan, Yi Wu, Bin Yi, Yudi Li, Ruiwei Wang, Xiaolong Liang, Yin Chen, Hui Wang, Shuai Tang, Yanzhou Wang
{"title":"Real-time automatic detection of gynecological laparoscopic surgical instruments and exploration in surgical skills assessment application: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Huanyu Wei, Li Deng, Xueju Wu, Wenwei Tan, Yi Wu, Bin Yi, Yudi Li, Ruiwei Wang, Xiaolong Liang, Yin Chen, Hui Wang, Shuai Tang, Yanzhou Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automatic detection of surgical instruments is essential for Artificial Intelligence Surgery. This study aimed to construct a large-scale dataset of gynecological laparoscopic surgical instruments based on real surgical scenarios, achieve high-precision real-time detection of surgical instruments, and explore their potential application in surgical skill evaluation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study collected 265 gynecological laparoscopic surgical videos from two medical centers for instrument detection. Videos were divided into training and testing sets in a 4:1 ratio, with 161,348 instrument instances extracted. The instruments were detected using Real-Time Models for Object Detection (RTMDet). The mean average precision, sensitivity, and F1 score served as evaluation metrics. External validation was conducted on an independent dataset from a third medical center. Additionally, we further compared the RTMDet with the state-of-the-art PP-YOLOE model on the same dataset. Furthermore, this study performed real-time tracking of instruments during the vaginal cuff suturing step of laparoscopic hysterectomy and compared the differences in kinematic data between proficient and non-proficient videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean average precision, sensitivity, and F1 score for 9 types of surgical instruments were 91.75%, 94.29%, and 93.00%, respectively. External validation on the independent dataset demonstrated robust performance. In the comparison with PP-YOLOE, RTMDet demonstrated superior performance in all metrics. In the comparative analysis of kinematic data, the proficient group demonstrated significantly lesser path lengths and inter-quartile range, shorter moving times, and higher movement velocities for instruments used by both hands compared to the non-proficient group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study established a large-scale, real scenario-based database of gynecological laparoscopic instruments. Using the RTMDet model, high-precision real-time detection and tracking of multiple instruments were achieved. Furthermore, this study identified several instrument kinematic metrics that can be used for surgical skill assessment, providing a reference for the objective quantification of the subjective Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS).</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automatic detection of surgical instruments is essential for Artificial Intelligence Surgery. This study aimed to construct a large-scale dataset of gynecological laparoscopic surgical instruments based on real surgical scenarios, achieve high-precision real-time detection of surgical instruments, and explore their potential application in surgical skill evaluation.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study collected 265 gynecological laparoscopic surgical videos from two medical centers for instrument detection. Videos were divided into training and testing sets in a 4:1 ratio, with 161,348 instrument instances extracted. The instruments were detected using Real-Time Models for Object Detection (RTMDet). The mean average precision, sensitivity, and F1 score served as evaluation metrics. External validation was conducted on an independent dataset from a third medical center. Additionally, we further compared the RTMDet with the state-of-the-art PP-YOLOE model on the same dataset. Furthermore, this study performed real-time tracking of instruments during the vaginal cuff suturing step of laparoscopic hysterectomy and compared the differences in kinematic data between proficient and non-proficient videos.

Results: The mean average precision, sensitivity, and F1 score for 9 types of surgical instruments were 91.75%, 94.29%, and 93.00%, respectively. External validation on the independent dataset demonstrated robust performance. In the comparison with PP-YOLOE, RTMDet demonstrated superior performance in all metrics. In the comparative analysis of kinematic data, the proficient group demonstrated significantly lesser path lengths and inter-quartile range, shorter moving times, and higher movement velocities for instruments used by both hands compared to the non-proficient group.

Conclusions: This study established a large-scale, real scenario-based database of gynecological laparoscopic instruments. Using the RTMDet model, high-precision real-time detection and tracking of multiple instruments were achieved. Furthermore, this study identified several instrument kinematic metrics that can be used for surgical skill assessment, providing a reference for the objective quantification of the subjective Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS).

妇科腹腔镜手术器械实时自动检测及在手术技能评估中的应用探讨:一项横断面研究。
背景:手术器械的自动检测是人工智能手术的关键。本研究旨在构建基于真实手术场景的大规模妇科腹腔镜手术器械数据集,实现对手术器械的高精度实时检测,探索其在手术技能评估中的潜在应用。材料与方法:本横断面研究收集了来自两家医疗中心的265段妇科腹腔镜手术视频,用于器械检测。将视频以4:1的比例分成训练集和测试集,共提取了161348个仪器实例。使用实时目标检测模型(RTMDet)对仪器进行检测。平均精密度、灵敏度和F1评分作为评价指标。外部验证是在来自第三方医疗中心的独立数据集上进行的。此外,我们进一步将RTMDet与同一数据集上最先进的PP-YOLOE模型进行了比较。此外,本研究在腹腔镜子宫切除术阴道袖带缝合步骤中对器械进行了实时跟踪,并比较了熟练和不熟练视频的运动学数据差异。结果:9种手术器械的平均精密度、灵敏度和F1评分分别为91.75%、94.29%和93.00%。在独立数据集上的外部验证显示了稳健的性能。在与PP-YOLOE的比较中,RTMDet在所有指标上都表现出优越的性能。在运动学数据的比较分析中,与非熟练组相比,熟练组表现出更短的路径长度和四分位数范围,更短的移动时间和更高的双手使用仪器的移动速度。结论:本研究建立了大规模、真实场景化的妇科腹腔镜器械数据库。利用RTMDet模型,实现了多台仪器的高精度实时检测与跟踪。此外,本研究确定了几个可用于手术技能评估的器械运动学指标,为主观的腹腔镜手术技能全球评估(goal)的客观量化提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信