Awareness of baseline functioning and sensitivity to improvement in older people with and without mild cognitive impairment receiving a computerized functional skills training program.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
International psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.inpsyc.2024.100025
Philip D Harvey, Anna Strassnig, Martin T Strassnig, Andrea Rivera-Molina, Annalee Mueller, Colin A Depp, Raeanne C Moore, Peter Kallestrup, Sara J Czaja
{"title":"Awareness of baseline functioning and sensitivity to improvement in older people with and without mild cognitive impairment receiving a computerized functional skills training program.","authors":"Philip D Harvey, Anna Strassnig, Martin T Strassnig, Andrea Rivera-Molina, Annalee Mueller, Colin A Depp, Raeanne C Moore, Peter Kallestrup, Sara J Czaja","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2024.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the relative ability of participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to self-assess their cognitive performance and training gains.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized clinical trial with baseline and post treatment objective and self -report assessments.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multiple community centers in New York City and South Florida.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>MCI (n = 84) participants and individuals with normal cognition NC (n = 68).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>MCI participants were randomized to receive fully remote functional skills training (FUNSAT) alone or with Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT), while NC participants received FUNSAT alone twice a week for up to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Gains in performance of trained functional skills, performance-based assessments of cognition and functional capacity, and global and specific self-reports of functional abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline performance for all performance-based variables was significantly worse in the MCI participants, all p < .001, all d> .77. Training-related Improvements were found for all variables for both groups, all p < .001, all d> .54. However, baseline group differences in global and specific self-reports were smaller all p > .02, d< .44, than objective performance differences. Baseline reports of global functioning were correlated with baseline performance variables in both groups, although no self-reported changes in either global or specific self-reports were significant for either sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with MCI underestimated their performance deficits at baseline. Self-reports of changes in everyday functioning do not track the substantial objective changes. Previous studies have reported a lack of sensitivity to training gains in several different conditions. Strategies to increase awareness of training gains may be required to sustain treatment benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":"37 3","pages":"100025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2024.100025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the relative ability of participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to self-assess their cognitive performance and training gains.

Design: Randomized clinical trial with baseline and post treatment objective and self -report assessments.

Setting: Multiple community centers in New York City and South Florida.

Participants: MCI (n = 84) participants and individuals with normal cognition NC (n = 68).

Intervention: MCI participants were randomized to receive fully remote functional skills training (FUNSAT) alone or with Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT), while NC participants received FUNSAT alone twice a week for up to 12 weeks.

Measurements: Gains in performance of trained functional skills, performance-based assessments of cognition and functional capacity, and global and specific self-reports of functional abilities.

Results: Baseline performance for all performance-based variables was significantly worse in the MCI participants, all p < .001, all d> .77. Training-related Improvements were found for all variables for both groups, all p < .001, all d> .54. However, baseline group differences in global and specific self-reports were smaller all p > .02, d< .44, than objective performance differences. Baseline reports of global functioning were correlated with baseline performance variables in both groups, although no self-reported changes in either global or specific self-reports were significant for either sample.

Conclusions: Participants with MCI underestimated their performance deficits at baseline. Self-reports of changes in everyday functioning do not track the substantial objective changes. Previous studies have reported a lack of sensitivity to training gains in several different conditions. Strategies to increase awareness of training gains may be required to sustain treatment benefits.

接受计算机化功能技能培训计划的有或无轻度认知障碍的老年人的基线功能意识和对改善的敏感性。
目的:研究轻度认知障碍(MCI)参与者自我评估其认知表现和训练收益的相对能力。设计:随机临床试验,基线和治疗后目标和自我报告评估。背景:位于纽约市和南佛罗里达的多个社区中心。参与者:MCI (n = 84)参与者和认知正常NC (n = 68)个体。干预:MCI参与者随机接受完全远程功能技能训练(FUNSAT)或计算机化认知训练(CCT),而NC参与者每周单独接受两次FUNSAT,为期12周。测量:训练功能技能的表现,基于表现的认知和功能能力评估,以及功能能力的整体和特定自我报告。结果:MCI参与者的所有基于表现的变量的基线表现明显更差,均为p .77。两组的所有变量均发现与训练相关的改善,均为p .54。然而,总体自我报告和特定自我报告的基线组差异较小(p < 0.05)。结论:MCI参与者低估了他们在基线时的表现缺陷。日常功能变化的自我报告不能追踪实质性的客观变化。先前的研究报告了在几种不同的条件下对训练收益缺乏敏感性。为了维持治疗效益,可能需要提高对培训收益的认识的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信