Global Burden of Disease disability weights for the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - All Injury Program.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Madeline E Moberg, Jaimie D Steinmetz, Kanyin Liane Ong, Hailey Lenox, Ted R Miller, Cora Peterson
{"title":"Global Burden of Disease disability weights for the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - All Injury Program.","authors":"Madeline E Moberg, Jaimie D Steinmetz, Kanyin Liane Ong, Hailey Lenox, Ted R Miller, Cora Peterson","doi":"10.1136/ip-2025-045705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring the impact of non-fatal injuries and violence is essential for informed public health policy-making and communications. This study aimed to generate new health-related quality of life data for a prominent US non-fatal injury surveillance source using disability weights derived from general population survey estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disability weights reflecting severity as measured on a 0 (no disability) to 1 (death) scale, for 47 natures of injury from the Global Burden of Diseases, Risk Factors and Injuries Study (GBD) were mapped to 492 injury types in the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP). The matching of GBD natures of injury to NEISS-AIP injury types was based on the underlying definitions for each injury diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average disability value weighted by incidence for all NEISS-AIP types was 0.073 (95% uncertainty interval: 0.050-0.097), and the range by injured body part and diagnosis was 0.006-0.408. Injuries that impacted large or critical body parts (lower trunk, upper trunk, head and neck) had the highest disability weights. Internal injuries, crushing, burns, nerve damage and fractures had higher disability weight values than lacerations, avulsions and contusions. The three most common NEISS-AIP non-fatal injury types during 2015-2020 were poisoning, internal injuries of the head and face lacerations, with disability weights of 0.163 (0.109-0.227), 0.168 (0.112-0.232) and 0.018 (0.010-0.029), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mapping of publicly available disability weights data to a prominent non-fatal injury surveillance source can improve opportunities to measure and communicate the health and economic impact of injuries and violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2025-045705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring the impact of non-fatal injuries and violence is essential for informed public health policy-making and communications. This study aimed to generate new health-related quality of life data for a prominent US non-fatal injury surveillance source using disability weights derived from general population survey estimates.

Methods: Disability weights reflecting severity as measured on a 0 (no disability) to 1 (death) scale, for 47 natures of injury from the Global Burden of Diseases, Risk Factors and Injuries Study (GBD) were mapped to 492 injury types in the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP). The matching of GBD natures of injury to NEISS-AIP injury types was based on the underlying definitions for each injury diagnosis.

Results: The average disability value weighted by incidence for all NEISS-AIP types was 0.073 (95% uncertainty interval: 0.050-0.097), and the range by injured body part and diagnosis was 0.006-0.408. Injuries that impacted large or critical body parts (lower trunk, upper trunk, head and neck) had the highest disability weights. Internal injuries, crushing, burns, nerve damage and fractures had higher disability weight values than lacerations, avulsions and contusions. The three most common NEISS-AIP non-fatal injury types during 2015-2020 were poisoning, internal injuries of the head and face lacerations, with disability weights of 0.163 (0.109-0.227), 0.168 (0.112-0.232) and 0.018 (0.010-0.029), respectively.

Conclusions: Mapping of publicly available disability weights data to a prominent non-fatal injury surveillance source can improve opportunities to measure and communicate the health and economic impact of injuries and violence.

美国国家电子伤害监测系统-所有伤害计划的全球疾病负担残疾权重。
背景:衡量非致命伤害和暴力的影响对于知情的公共卫生决策和沟通至关重要。本研究旨在利用来自一般人口调查估计值的残疾权重,为美国一个著名的非致命伤害监测来源生成新的与健康相关的生活质量数据。方法:残疾权重反映严重程度,以0(无残疾)到1(死亡)的尺度衡量,来自全球疾病负担的47种伤害,危险因素和伤害研究(GBD)映射到美国国家电子伤害监测系统-所有伤害计划(NEISS-AIP)中的492种伤害类型。损伤的GBD性质与NEISS-AIP损伤类型的匹配是基于每种损伤诊断的基本定义。结果:各类型NEISS-AIP发病加权平均致残值为0.073(95%不确定区间为0.050 ~ 0.097),损伤部位及诊断的致残值范围为0.006 ~ 0.408。影响较大或关键身体部位(下躯干、上躯干、头部和颈部)的损伤有最高的残疾权重。内伤、挤压、烧伤、神经损伤和骨折的失能重量值高于撕裂伤、撕脱伤和挫伤。2015-2020年最常见的3种NEISS-AIP非致死性损伤类型为中毒、头部内伤和面部撕裂伤,致残权重分别为0.163(0.109 ~ 0.227)、0.168(0.112 ~ 0.232)和0.018(0.010 ~ 0.029)。结论:将公开获得的残疾权重数据映射到一个突出的非致命伤害监测来源,可以改善衡量和传达伤害和暴力对健康和经济影响的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信