Analysis of low attendance rates in medical schools: student perspectives on anatomy lectures.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Huseyin Erdem
{"title":"Analysis of low attendance rates in medical schools: student perspectives on anatomy lectures.","authors":"Huseyin Erdem","doi":"10.5603/fm.105171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low attendance rates arise as an essential issue in medical schools since e-learning alternatives offer flexible participation models. This study aimed to examine the personal and environmental factors affecting the participation to lectures by focusing on the attendance habits of second-year medical students in anatomy lectures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional questionnaire analysis and was conducted on a sample of 2nd year medical students. Data were collected using a questionnaire that included 23-item Likert-type lecture attendance scale and a question measuring the awareness of attendance requirement. The reliability of the scales was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.852) and construct validity was tested with factor analysis. Data were evaluated with percentages and statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who were aware of the attendance requirement stated that they benefited more from the lectures (55.6% vs. 33.4%, p < 0.001) and found the lecture contents more engaging (70.2% vs. 52.0%, p < 0.001). While 66% of the students indicated that the lecture schedules were inconvenient, 61.4% preferred online materials instead of attending face-to-face lectures. In addition, 46.1% of the students reported that the lecture content was not engaging and 38.2% indicated that the lectures were boring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the factors affecting the attendance in anatomy lectures such as motivation, lecture hours, learning environment and social interaction. Reducing early lectures, adapting online materials to asynchronous learning style and using active learning methods were recommended. Student-centered and inclusive approaches are critical for sustainable success in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.105171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low attendance rates arise as an essential issue in medical schools since e-learning alternatives offer flexible participation models. This study aimed to examine the personal and environmental factors affecting the participation to lectures by focusing on the attendance habits of second-year medical students in anatomy lectures.

Materials and methods: This study was a cross-sectional questionnaire analysis and was conducted on a sample of 2nd year medical students. Data were collected using a questionnaire that included 23-item Likert-type lecture attendance scale and a question measuring the awareness of attendance requirement. The reliability of the scales was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.852) and construct validity was tested with factor analysis. Data were evaluated with percentages and statistical analyses.

Results: Students who were aware of the attendance requirement stated that they benefited more from the lectures (55.6% vs. 33.4%, p < 0.001) and found the lecture contents more engaging (70.2% vs. 52.0%, p < 0.001). While 66% of the students indicated that the lecture schedules were inconvenient, 61.4% preferred online materials instead of attending face-to-face lectures. In addition, 46.1% of the students reported that the lecture content was not engaging and 38.2% indicated that the lectures were boring.

Conclusions: This study revealed that the factors affecting the attendance in anatomy lectures such as motivation, lecture hours, learning environment and social interaction. Reducing early lectures, adapting online materials to asynchronous learning style and using active learning methods were recommended. Student-centered and inclusive approaches are critical for sustainable success in medical education.

医学院低出勤率分析:学生对解剖学讲座的看法。
背景:由于电子学习提供了灵活的参与模式,低出勤率成为医学院的一个重要问题。本研究以医二年级学生解剖课的出勤习惯为研究对象,探讨影响学生听课的个人因素和环境因素。材料与方法:本研究采用横断面问卷调查法,以医科二年级学生为研究对象。数据收集采用问卷调查,其中包括23项李克特式讲课出勤量表和一个测量出勤要求意识的问题。量表的信度采用Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.852)验证,结构效度采用因子分析检验。采用百分比和统计分析对资料进行评价。结果:意识到出勤要求的学生表示他们从讲座中获益更多(55.6%对33.4%,p < 0.001),并且认为讲座内容更吸引人(70.2%对52.0%,p < 0.001)。66%的学生表示上课时间表不方便,61.4%的学生更喜欢网上资料,而不是参加面对面的讲座。此外,46.1%的学生表示讲座内容不吸引人,38.2%的学生表示讲座无聊。结论:本研究揭示了影响解剖课出勤率的因素有动机、上课时数、学习环境和社会互动。建议减少早期讲座,调整在线材料以适应异步学习风格,并采用主动学习方法。以学生为中心和包容的方法是医学教育可持续成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信