Improving shared decision‑making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease, and their parents: an observational post-intervention study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ricardo O Wijngaarde, Samantha C Gouw, Dirk T Ubbink
{"title":"Improving shared decision‑making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease, and their parents: an observational post-intervention study.","authors":"Ricardo O Wijngaarde, Samantha C Gouw, Dirk T Ubbink","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06241-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) suffer from a chronic disease that can lead to serious co-morbidity and impacts their quality of life. During the course of their disease, a variety of health-related decisions need to be made for and by SCD-patients, depending on their age and health status, together with their parents and paediatric haematology clinicians. Shared decision-making (SDM) may improve health outcomes of chronically ill children but is still not commonly applied. We assessed the level of SDM among paediatric haematologists after the introduction of SDM interventions. An observational post-intervention study was conducted in a paediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. After an SDM consultation training of the three paediatric haematologists and introduction of SDM-supporting tools for both paediatricians and (parents of) patients with SCD, two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument. SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires were used to measure the level of SDM as perceived by patients/parents and paediatricians, respectively. Scores were expressed as a percentage, ranging from 0% (no SDM observed) to 100% (exemplary level of SDM). Participants were 9 female and 9 male patients between 4 months and 17 years old, with a median age of 7.5 years (Interquartile Range [IQR] 2.5-12). Eighteen consultations (six per paediatrician) in which a decision was to be made about SCD treatment options were analysed. Median OPTION-5 score was 50 (IQR 40-65%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 73% (IQR 52.2-91) and 62.2% (IQR 55.6-71.1), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After the introduction of SDM training and tools, paediatric haematologists reached a moderately good level of SDM. This level had doubled as compared to the baseline level, as assessed in a previous study.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Children who suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are vulnerable to health inequities and suboptimal health outcomes. Hence, SDM seems an appropriate method of care for these children. • SDM tools and training may help paediatricians and children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about the children's preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• After SDM training and decision support aids for paediatricians and patients, the level of involvement in the decision-making process by (the parents of) patients suffering from SCD reached a moderately good level. • A difference persists between paediatricians' perceived level of involving the child and parents in a shared decision-making process and the observed level of involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 7","pages":"417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06241-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) suffer from a chronic disease that can lead to serious co-morbidity and impacts their quality of life. During the course of their disease, a variety of health-related decisions need to be made for and by SCD-patients, depending on their age and health status, together with their parents and paediatric haematology clinicians. Shared decision-making (SDM) may improve health outcomes of chronically ill children but is still not commonly applied. We assessed the level of SDM among paediatric haematologists after the introduction of SDM interventions. An observational post-intervention study was conducted in a paediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. After an SDM consultation training of the three paediatric haematologists and introduction of SDM-supporting tools for both paediatricians and (parents of) patients with SCD, two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument. SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires were used to measure the level of SDM as perceived by patients/parents and paediatricians, respectively. Scores were expressed as a percentage, ranging from 0% (no SDM observed) to 100% (exemplary level of SDM). Participants were 9 female and 9 male patients between 4 months and 17 years old, with a median age of 7.5 years (Interquartile Range [IQR] 2.5-12). Eighteen consultations (six per paediatrician) in which a decision was to be made about SCD treatment options were analysed. Median OPTION-5 score was 50 (IQR 40-65%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 73% (IQR 52.2-91) and 62.2% (IQR 55.6-71.1), respectively.

Conclusion: After the introduction of SDM training and tools, paediatric haematologists reached a moderately good level of SDM. This level had doubled as compared to the baseline level, as assessed in a previous study.

What is known: • Children who suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are vulnerable to health inequities and suboptimal health outcomes. Hence, SDM seems an appropriate method of care for these children. • SDM tools and training may help paediatricians and children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about the children's preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes.

What is new: • After SDM training and decision support aids for paediatricians and patients, the level of involvement in the decision-making process by (the parents of) patients suffering from SCD reached a moderately good level. • A difference persists between paediatricians' perceived level of involving the child and parents in a shared decision-making process and the observed level of involvement.

改善儿科血液科医生、镰状细胞病患儿及其父母之间的共同决策:一项干预后观察性研究
患有镰状细胞病(SCD)的儿童患有一种慢性疾病,可导致严重的合并症并影响他们的生活质量。在他们的疾病过程中,scd患者需要根据他们的年龄和健康状况,与他们的父母和儿科血液学临床医生一起做出各种与健康相关的决定。共同决策(SDM)可以改善慢性病儿童的健康结果,但仍未得到普遍应用。在引入SDM干预措施后,我们评估了儿科血液科医生的SDM水平。在一所大学医院的儿科门诊进行了一项观察性干预后研究。在对三名儿科血液科医生进行SDM会诊培训,并向儿科医生和SCD患者(家长)介绍SDM支持工具后,两名评估人员使用OPTION-5仪器,通过会诊录音,独立客观地分析了患者参与决策的程度。采用SDM- q -9和SDM- q - doc问卷分别测量患者/家长和儿科医生对SDM的感知水平。分数以百分比表示,范围从0%(未观察到SDM)到100% (SDM的示范水平)。参与者为9名女性和9名男性患者,年龄在4个月至17岁之间,中位年龄为7.5岁(四分位间距[IQR] 2.5-12)。分析了18次咨询(每个儿科医生6次)对SCD治疗方案作出的决定。中位OPTION-5评分为50分(IQR为40-65%)。SDM-Q-9和SDM-Q-Doc评分中位数分别为73% (IQR 52.2-91)和62.2% (IQR 55.6-71.1)。结论:在引入SDM培训和工具后,儿科血液病医生的SDM达到了中等良好水平。这一水平是先前研究评估的基线水平的两倍。已知情况:•患有镰状细胞病(SCD)的儿童容易受到健康不平等和次优健康结果的影响。因此,SDM似乎是照顾这些孩子的合适方法。•SDM工具和培训可帮助儿科医生和儿童参与关于儿童首选治疗方案的协作决策过程,并改善其健康结果。新发现:•经过SDM培训和对儿科医生和患者的决策支持辅助,SCD患者(父母)参与决策过程的水平达到了中等水平。•儿科医生对儿童和家长参与共同决策过程的感知水平与观察到的参与水平之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信