Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for pain, disability, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jiaxin Pan, Yanbing Jia, Kuicheng Li, Xiaoyan Liu, Zhichao Liu, Zhenyang Cui, Linrong Liao, Yingxiu Diao, Hao Liu
{"title":"Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for pain, disability, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiaxin Pan, Yanbing Jia, Kuicheng Li, Xiaoyan Liu, Zhichao Liu, Zhenyang Cui, Linrong Liao, Yingxiu Diao, Hao Liu","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08442-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive and painless approach developed for therapeutic intervention in clinical rehabilitation. Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) originates from the musculoskeletal system and leads to disability and fear of pain. It may be an option for CMP treatment, but its effectiveness is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, PEDro, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant literatures according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria on May 26<sup>th</sup>, 2023.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The methodology quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2.0) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. The cumulative effects of available data were processed for a meta-analysis using RevMan software. Eight RCTs with 177 participants were included. All studies were assessed as having some concerns regarding the risk of bias. rPMS significantly reduced pain intensity compared with the control, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) across visual analogue scales (VAS) and numerical rating scales (NRS) was -1.16 (95% CI: -1.56 to -0.76, I<sup>2</sup>=21%, very low-quality evidence), indicating effective pain relief. For subgroup analysis of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), the meta-analysis revealed a remarkable pain relief (SMD=-0.92, 95% CI: -1.67 to -0.17, I<sup>2</sup>=45%, very low-quality evidence). In addition, rPMS exhibited significant cumulative effects on disability improvement (Oswestry disability index: MD=-6.55, 95% CI: -10.27 to -2.82, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, very low-quality evidence) but not on kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia: MD=-1.81, 95% CI: -7.60 to 3.98, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, low quality-evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated that rPMS is an effective method for relieving pain and improving disability in the treatment of CMP, especially for patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08442-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive and painless approach developed for therapeutic intervention in clinical rehabilitation. Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) originates from the musculoskeletal system and leads to disability and fear of pain. It may be an option for CMP treatment, but its effectiveness is still unclear.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed, PEDro, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant literatures according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria on May 26th, 2023.

Evidence synthesis: The methodology quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2.0) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. The cumulative effects of available data were processed for a meta-analysis using RevMan software. Eight RCTs with 177 participants were included. All studies were assessed as having some concerns regarding the risk of bias. rPMS significantly reduced pain intensity compared with the control, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) across visual analogue scales (VAS) and numerical rating scales (NRS) was -1.16 (95% CI: -1.56 to -0.76, I2=21%, very low-quality evidence), indicating effective pain relief. For subgroup analysis of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), the meta-analysis revealed a remarkable pain relief (SMD=-0.92, 95% CI: -1.67 to -0.17, I2=45%, very low-quality evidence). In addition, rPMS exhibited significant cumulative effects on disability improvement (Oswestry disability index: MD=-6.55, 95% CI: -10.27 to -2.82, I2=0%, very low-quality evidence) but not on kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia: MD=-1.81, 95% CI: -7.60 to 3.98, I2=0%, low quality-evidence).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that rPMS is an effective method for relieving pain and improving disability in the treatment of CMP, especially for patients with CLBP.

重复性外周磁刺激治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的疼痛、残疾和运动恐惧症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)是一种无创、无痛的临床康复治疗干预方法。慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)起源于肌肉骨骼系统,导致残疾和对疼痛的恐惧。它可能是CMP治疗的一种选择,但其有效性尚不清楚。证据获取:2023年5月26日,按照严格的纳入和排除标准,检索PubMed、PEDro、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase等相关文献。证据综合:采用Cochrane协作的偏倚风险工具(ROB 2.0)和GRADE(分级推荐、评估、发展和评价)系统评估纳入研究的方法学质量。利用RevMan软件对现有数据的累积效应进行meta分析。共纳入8项随机对照试验,共177名受试者。所有的研究都被评估为存在一定的偏倚风险。与对照组相比,rPMS显著降低了疼痛强度,视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数值评定量表(NRS)的标准化平均差(SMD)为-1.16 (95% CI: -1.56至-0.76,I2=21%,极低质量证据),表明疼痛有效缓解。对于慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的亚组分析,meta分析显示疼痛缓解显著(SMD=-0.92, 95% CI: -1.67至-0.17,I2=45%,极低质量证据)。此外,rPMS对残疾改善表现出显著的累积效应(Oswestry残疾指数:MD=-6.55, 95% CI: -10.27至-2.82,I2=0%,极低质量证据),但对运动恐惧症没有显著的累积效应(运动恐惧症的坦帕量表:MD=-1.81, 95% CI: -7.60至3.98,I2=0%,低质量证据)。结论:本荟萃分析表明,rPMS是缓解CMP疼痛和改善残疾的有效方法,特别是对于CLBP患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信