One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary Rhinoplasty.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Kristina L Khaw, Stephen M Lu
{"title":"One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Kristina L Khaw, Stephen M Lu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A goal of aesthetic rhinoplasty is to improve nasal aesthetics while preserving individuality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that primary rhinoplasty has a homogenizing effect on a patient's appearance and in a distinct manner for a given rhinoplasty surgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standardized, unedited pre- and postoperative photos, including frontal, lateral, and oblique views, of 145 Caucasian female primary rhinoplasty patients from the public websites of three independent, experienced rhinoplasty surgeons were included (Surgeon A: n=50, Surgeon B: n=50, Surgeon C: n=45). Using Amazon Rekognition, similarity between photos were calculated by comparing all preoperative photos to each other and all postoperative photos to each other. Similarity differences between pre- and postoperative views were calculated intra- and intercohort and standardized through the relative change in similarity. Paired t-tests evaluated the absolute relative changes while a simple t-test assessed the intercohort and intracohort differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were significantly more similar post surgery (17.58%, p<0.001) in the lateral (19.17%), oblique (19.02%), and frontal (14.38%) views. In the subgroups, Surgeon A similarity increased 37.95% while Surgeon B had a 24.60% increase, and Surgeon C a 17.68% increase. The intercohort similarity increase (14.15%) was significantly less than the intracohort increase (30.89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study illustrates that primary rhinoplasty patients have increased homogeneity postoperatively, particularly within surgeon cohorts. This is the first study that quantifies the homogenizing effect of rhinoplasties using neural networks and shows the quantifiable \"signature\" effect of a specific surgeon on their patients' appearances as a population. This study may impact how surgeons set patients' expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A goal of aesthetic rhinoplasty is to improve nasal aesthetics while preserving individuality.

Objectives: We hypothesized that primary rhinoplasty has a homogenizing effect on a patient's appearance and in a distinct manner for a given rhinoplasty surgeon.

Methods: Standardized, unedited pre- and postoperative photos, including frontal, lateral, and oblique views, of 145 Caucasian female primary rhinoplasty patients from the public websites of three independent, experienced rhinoplasty surgeons were included (Surgeon A: n=50, Surgeon B: n=50, Surgeon C: n=45). Using Amazon Rekognition, similarity between photos were calculated by comparing all preoperative photos to each other and all postoperative photos to each other. Similarity differences between pre- and postoperative views were calculated intra- and intercohort and standardized through the relative change in similarity. Paired t-tests evaluated the absolute relative changes while a simple t-test assessed the intercohort and intracohort differences.

Results: Patients were significantly more similar post surgery (17.58%, p<0.001) in the lateral (19.17%), oblique (19.02%), and frontal (14.38%) views. In the subgroups, Surgeon A similarity increased 37.95% while Surgeon B had a 24.60% increase, and Surgeon C a 17.68% increase. The intercohort similarity increase (14.15%) was significantly less than the intracohort increase (30.89%).

Conclusions: This study illustrates that primary rhinoplasty patients have increased homogeneity postoperatively, particularly within surgeon cohorts. This is the first study that quantifies the homogenizing effect of rhinoplasties using neural networks and shows the quantifiable "signature" effect of a specific surgeon on their patients' appearances as a population. This study may impact how surgeons set patients' expectations.

一个档案可以统治所有人?初次鼻整形均匀化效果的神经网络分析。
背景:鼻整形术的目标是在保持个性的同时改善鼻美观。目的:我们假设初级鼻整形对患者的外观有均匀的影响,并且对给定的鼻整形外科医生有不同的方式。方法:从3位独立的、经验丰富的鼻整形外科医生(A: n=50, B: n=50, C: n=45)的公共网站上收集了145例高加索女性初次鼻整形患者的标准化、未经编辑的术前和术后照片,包括正面、侧位和斜位视图。使用Amazon rekrecognition,通过比较所有术前照片和所有术后照片来计算照片之间的相似度。计算队列内和队列间术前和术后视图的相似性差异,并通过相似性的相对变化进行标准化。配对t检验评估绝对相对变化,而简单t检验评估队列间和队列内差异。结果:患者术后相似度显著提高(17.58%)。结论:本研究表明,初次鼻整形患者术后的同质性增加,特别是在外科医生队列中。这是第一个使用神经网络量化鼻整形均质化效果的研究,并显示了特定外科医生对患者整体外观的可量化“签名”效应。这项研究可能会影响外科医生如何设定患者的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信