Current approaches using remote monitoring technology in alcohol use disorder (AUD): an integrative review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Valentina Navarro-Ovando, Sterre van Schie, Imme Garrelfs, Jop Rijksbaron, Cristian Rodriguez Rivero, Ron Mathôt, Glenn Dumont
{"title":"Current approaches using remote monitoring technology in alcohol use disorder (AUD): an integrative review.","authors":"Valentina Navarro-Ovando, Sterre van Schie, Imme Garrelfs, Jop Rijksbaron, Cristian Rodriguez Rivero, Ron Mathôt, Glenn Dumont","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This integrative review aims to synthesize and update the current literature on mHealth applications and devices, such as smartphones, wearables, and breathalyzers, in alcohol use disorder (AUD) monitoring. It discusses the evolution of these tools, the current level of evidence, and facilitators and barriers to their implementation in research and interventions. The future potential for personalized interventions is also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Integrative review. Three databases-PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO-were used to identify quantitative and qualitative English written publications between 2014 and 2024, using terms related to mHealth, remote monitoring, and AUD. Results were extracted and comprehensively presented by topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight studies were included in the synthesis. Smartphones, mobile phones, breathalyzers, and wearables with transdermal sensors are the most frequently used devices for remote monitoring. The included studies demonstrated varying levels of development and evidence across devices. Ecological Momentary Assessment via smartphones was the most frequently used and, along with breathalyzers, was successfully applied in clinical trials involving interventions. Wearables were scarcely tested in interventions. Challenges related to adherence and psychological factors remain in a longer period of monitoring. Incipient use of predictive models integrating ongoing data shows promise in informing care providers and optimizing intervention delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence supporting mHealth tools for AUD remains uneven across device types. While smartphones and breathalyzers show greater clinical applicability, wearables and passive sensing remain exploratory. Robust, comparative research is needed to guide effective selection and integration into care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This integrative review aims to synthesize and update the current literature on mHealth applications and devices, such as smartphones, wearables, and breathalyzers, in alcohol use disorder (AUD) monitoring. It discusses the evolution of these tools, the current level of evidence, and facilitators and barriers to their implementation in research and interventions. The future potential for personalized interventions is also explored.

Methods: Integrative review. Three databases-PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO-were used to identify quantitative and qualitative English written publications between 2014 and 2024, using terms related to mHealth, remote monitoring, and AUD. Results were extracted and comprehensively presented by topic.

Results: Fifty-eight studies were included in the synthesis. Smartphones, mobile phones, breathalyzers, and wearables with transdermal sensors are the most frequently used devices for remote monitoring. The included studies demonstrated varying levels of development and evidence across devices. Ecological Momentary Assessment via smartphones was the most frequently used and, along with breathalyzers, was successfully applied in clinical trials involving interventions. Wearables were scarcely tested in interventions. Challenges related to adherence and psychological factors remain in a longer period of monitoring. Incipient use of predictive models integrating ongoing data shows promise in informing care providers and optimizing intervention delivery.

Conclusions: Evidence supporting mHealth tools for AUD remains uneven across device types. While smartphones and breathalyzers show greater clinical applicability, wearables and passive sensing remain exploratory. Robust, comparative research is needed to guide effective selection and integration into care.

目前使用远程监测技术治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的方法:一项综合综述。
目的:本综合综述旨在综合和更新当前关于移动健康应用程序和设备的文献,如智能手机、可穿戴设备和酒精测试仪,用于酒精使用障碍(AUD)监测。它讨论了这些工具的演变、目前的证据水平,以及在研究和干预措施中实施这些工具的促进因素和障碍。还探讨了个性化干预的未来潜力。方法:综合评价。三个数据库——pubmed、Web of Science和psycinfo——被用来识别2014年至2024年间定量和定性的英语书面出版物,使用与移动健康、远程监控和AUD相关的术语。提取结果并按主题综合呈现。结果:共纳入58项研究。智能手机、移动电话、呼吸测醉器和带有透皮传感器的可穿戴设备是最常用的远程监测设备。纳入的研究显示了不同设备的不同发展水平和证据。通过智能手机进行的生态瞬间评估是最常用的,与呼吸测醉器一起,成功地应用于涉及干预的临床试验中。可穿戴设备几乎没有在干预中进行测试。与坚持和心理因素有关的挑战在较长时间的监测中仍然存在。整合正在进行的数据的预测模型的初步使用显示了在通知护理提供者和优化干预交付方面的希望。结论:支持移动医疗工具治疗AUD的证据在设备类型上仍然不均衡。虽然智能手机和酒精测试仪显示出更大的临床适用性,但可穿戴设备和被动传感仍处于探索阶段。需要强有力的比较研究来指导有效的选择和纳入护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信