Radiomics and machine learning for predicting valve vegetation in infective endocarditis: a comparative analysis of mitral and aortic valves using TEE imaging.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Farid Esmaely, Pardis Moradnejad, Shabnam Boudagh, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
{"title":"Radiomics and machine learning for predicting valve vegetation in infective endocarditis: a comparative analysis of mitral and aortic valves using TEE imaging.","authors":"Farid Esmaely, Pardis Moradnejad, Shabnam Boudagh, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2025.2500887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detecting valve vegetation in infective endocarditis (IE) poses challenges, particularly with mechanical valves, because acoustic shadowing artefacts often obscure critical diagnostic details. This study aimed to classify native and prosthetic mitral and aortic valves with and without vegetation using radiomics and machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>286 TEE scans from suspected IE cases (August 2023-November 2024) were analysed alongside 113 rejected IE as control cases. Frames were preprocessed using the Extreme Total Variation Bilateral (ETVB) filter, and radiomics features were extracted for classification using machine learning models, including Random Forest, Decision Tree, SVM, k-NN, and XGBoost. in order to evaluate the models, AUC, ROC curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For native mitral valves, SVM achieved the highest performance with an AUC of 0.88, a sensitivity of 0.91, and a specificity of 0.87. Mechanical mitral valves also showed optimal results with SVM (AUC: 0.85, sensitivity: 0.73, specificity: 0.92). Native aortic valves were best classified using SVM (AUC: 0.86, sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.86), while Random Forest excelled for mechanical aortic valves (AUC: 0.81, sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that combining the models with the clinician's report may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of TEE, particularly in the absence of advanced imaging methods like PET/CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2500887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Detecting valve vegetation in infective endocarditis (IE) poses challenges, particularly with mechanical valves, because acoustic shadowing artefacts often obscure critical diagnostic details. This study aimed to classify native and prosthetic mitral and aortic valves with and without vegetation using radiomics and machine learning.

Methods: 286 TEE scans from suspected IE cases (August 2023-November 2024) were analysed alongside 113 rejected IE as control cases. Frames were preprocessed using the Extreme Total Variation Bilateral (ETVB) filter, and radiomics features were extracted for classification using machine learning models, including Random Forest, Decision Tree, SVM, k-NN, and XGBoost. in order to evaluate the models, AUC, ROC curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) were used.

Results: For native mitral valves, SVM achieved the highest performance with an AUC of 0.88, a sensitivity of 0.91, and a specificity of 0.87. Mechanical mitral valves also showed optimal results with SVM (AUC: 0.85, sensitivity: 0.73, specificity: 0.92). Native aortic valves were best classified using SVM (AUC: 0.86, sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.86), while Random Forest excelled for mechanical aortic valves (AUC: 0.81, sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.78).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that combining the models with the clinician's report may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of TEE, particularly in the absence of advanced imaging methods like PET/CT.

放射组学和机器学习用于预测感染性心内膜炎的瓣膜植被:使用TEE成像的二尖瓣和主动脉瓣的比较分析。
背景:感染性心内膜炎(IE)的瓣膜植被检测具有挑战性,特别是机械瓣膜,因为声学阴影伪影通常会模糊关键的诊断细节。本研究旨在使用放射组学和机器学习对原生和人工二尖瓣和主动脉瓣进行分类。方法:分析疑似IE病例286例TEE扫描(2023年8月~ 2024年11月)及113例拒绝IE的对照病例。使用极端总变异双边(ETVB)滤波器对帧进行预处理,并使用随机森林、决策树、支持向量机、k-NN和XGBoost等机器学习模型提取放射组学特征进行分类。采用AUC、ROC曲线和决策曲线分析(Decision Curve Analysis, DCA)对模型进行评价。结果:对于天然二尖瓣,SVM的AUC为0.88,灵敏度为0.91,特异性为0.87。机械二尖瓣支持向量机也显示出最佳结果(AUC: 0.85,灵敏度:0.73,特异性:0.92)。支持向量机(SVM)对天然主动脉瓣的分类效果最好(AUC: 0.86,灵敏度:0.87,特异性:0.86),而随机森林(Random Forest)对机械主动脉瓣的分类效果最好(AUC: 0.81,灵敏度:0.89,特异性:0.78)。结论:这些发现表明,将模型与临床医生的报告相结合可以提高TEE的诊断准确性,特别是在缺乏PET/CT等先进成像方法的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta cardiologica
Acta cardiologica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信