Matthew Kolisnyk , Teneille E. Gofton , Loretta Norton , Derek B. Debicki , Nathan Scales , Amanda Van Beinum , Laura Hornby , Sam Shemie , Sonny Dhanani , Marat Slessarev
{"title":"The relationship between cessation of brain and systemic circulation after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures","authors":"Matthew Kolisnyk , Teneille E. Gofton , Loretta Norton , Derek B. Debicki , Nathan Scales , Amanda Van Beinum , Laura Hornby , Sam Shemie , Sonny Dhanani , Marat Slessarev","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In donation after circulatory death, it is assumed that cessation of brain activity and brain blood flow occur close to the time of circulatory arrest. However, this assumption lacks direct empirical data that would support current death determination guidelines, ensure donor safety, and maintain public trust. We conducted a single-center prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing controlled withdrawal of life-sustaining measures. We measured systemic circulation using an indwelling arterial cannula and assessed brain blood flow with transcranial Doppler. In a subset of patients, we also recorded brain electrical activity using electroencephalography. Our results demonstrate that brain blood flow consistently stopped before or simultaneously with systemic circulation (median, −179 seconds; range, −458 to 0 seconds; <em>P</em> = .016) and at a higher mean arterial pressure (median, 30 mm Hg; range, 24-36 mm Hg; <em>P</em> = .003) and pulse pressure (median, 13 mm Hg; range, 0-24 mm Hg; <em>P</em> = .006). Among patients with both transcranial Doppler and electroencephalography data, brain activity generally stopped after brain blood flow but before circulatory arrest. These findings support current death determination guidelines, strengthening confidence in donor safety protocols and reinforcing public trust in organ donation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 10","pages":"Pages 2142-2150"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525003223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In donation after circulatory death, it is assumed that cessation of brain activity and brain blood flow occur close to the time of circulatory arrest. However, this assumption lacks direct empirical data that would support current death determination guidelines, ensure donor safety, and maintain public trust. We conducted a single-center prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing controlled withdrawal of life-sustaining measures. We measured systemic circulation using an indwelling arterial cannula and assessed brain blood flow with transcranial Doppler. In a subset of patients, we also recorded brain electrical activity using electroencephalography. Our results demonstrate that brain blood flow consistently stopped before or simultaneously with systemic circulation (median, −179 seconds; range, −458 to 0 seconds; P = .016) and at a higher mean arterial pressure (median, 30 mm Hg; range, 24-36 mm Hg; P = .003) and pulse pressure (median, 13 mm Hg; range, 0-24 mm Hg; P = .006). Among patients with both transcranial Doppler and electroencephalography data, brain activity generally stopped after brain blood flow but before circulatory arrest. These findings support current death determination guidelines, strengthening confidence in donor safety protocols and reinforcing public trust in organ donation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.