Radioisotopic labeling reveals inaccuracy of phosphorus use efficiency of ammonium phosphate fertilizers calculated by the difference method

IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andrew J. Margenot, Neha Chatterjee, Chongyang Li
{"title":"Radioisotopic labeling reveals inaccuracy of phosphorus use efficiency of ammonium phosphate fertilizers calculated by the difference method","authors":"Andrew J. Margenot,&nbsp;Neha Chatterjee,&nbsp;Chongyang Li","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management of phosphorus (P) inputs to agroecosystems is often evaluated by phosphorus use efficiency (PUE), but different calculation approaches may yield discrepancies in estimated PUE values. We evaluated PUE (i) indirectly calculated by difference in crop P uptake between a P-fertilized versus a P-unfertilized control (PUE<sub>diff</sub>) and (ii) directly measured by tracing radioisotopically labeled fertilizer P (PUE<sub>isotope</sub>). Using two ammonium phosphate fertilizers of high (monoammonium phosphate [MAP]) and low (struvite) water solubility in three soils with non-limiting extractable soil P concentrations (Mehlich-3 P &gt; 25 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>), we find dissimilar PUE<sub>isotope</sub> versus PUE<sub>diff</sub>. PUE<sub>diff</sub> often yielded negative values (77% of observations), whereas PUE<sub>isotope</sub> was (i) positive and (ii) higher (two- to fourfold) for MAP than struvite, and (iii) unassociated with soil Mehlich-3 P concentrations. Thus, PUE<sub>diff</sub> appears to underestimate PUE and miss differences in PUE among fertilizerss. Our results raise the need to reconsider calculation of PUE and to address practical challenges to in situ measurement of PUE<sub>isotope</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of phosphorus (P) inputs to agroecosystems is often evaluated by phosphorus use efficiency (PUE), but different calculation approaches may yield discrepancies in estimated PUE values. We evaluated PUE (i) indirectly calculated by difference in crop P uptake between a P-fertilized versus a P-unfertilized control (PUEdiff) and (ii) directly measured by tracing radioisotopically labeled fertilizer P (PUEisotope). Using two ammonium phosphate fertilizers of high (monoammonium phosphate [MAP]) and low (struvite) water solubility in three soils with non-limiting extractable soil P concentrations (Mehlich-3 P > 25 mg kg−1), we find dissimilar PUEisotope versus PUEdiff. PUEdiff often yielded negative values (77% of observations), whereas PUEisotope was (i) positive and (ii) higher (two- to fourfold) for MAP than struvite, and (iii) unassociated with soil Mehlich-3 P concentrations. Thus, PUEdiff appears to underestimate PUE and miss differences in PUE among fertilizerss. Our results raise the need to reconsider calculation of PUE and to address practical challenges to in situ measurement of PUEisotope.

Abstract Image

放射性同位素标记揭示了差值法计算磷铵肥料磷利用效率的不准确性
对农业生态系统磷投入的管理通常以磷利用效率(PUE)来评估,但不同的计算方法可能会产生估计的PUE值差异。我们评估了PUE (i)通过施磷肥与未施磷肥对照间作物磷素吸收差异间接计算(PUEdiff)和(ii)通过示踪放射性同位素标记肥料P (pue同位素)直接测量。在3种可提取土壤磷浓度不受限制的土壤(Mehlich-3 P >;25 mg kg−1),我们发现pue同位素与PUEdiff不同。PUEdiff通常产生负值(77%的观测值),而pue同位素(i)为阳性,(ii) MAP比鸟粪石高(2至4倍),(iii)与土壤mehlich - 3p浓度无关。因此,PUEdiff似乎低估了PUE,忽略了不同肥料之间PUE的差异。我们的结果提出了重新考虑PUE计算的必要性,并解决了PUE同位素原位测量的实际挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信