Yield and economics following 5 years of integrated weed management in cotton

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Amar S. Godar, Jason K. Norsworthy, L. Tom Barber, Roger Farr, Ty Smith
{"title":"Yield and economics following 5 years of integrated weed management in cotton","authors":"Amar S. Godar,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy,&nbsp;L. Tom Barber,&nbsp;Roger Farr,&nbsp;Ty Smith","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The implementation of integrated weed management (IWM) practices in conventional management systems involves additional costs and can influence both short-term and long-term cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) yields, ultimately affecting economic viability. This study, conducted from fall 2018 to fall 2023 near Marianna, AR, evaluated four IWM practices in a large-plot, fixed-plot factorial design: zero tolerance for weed seed rain, soil inversion deep tillage every third year in the fall, a preplant terminated cereal rye cover crop, and dicamba-resistant cotton technology. Long-term economic impacts were assessed using the 5-year average cost-adjusted yield, with the base program (excluding all IWM practices) serving as the control. Zero tolerance did not influence cotton yield and, due to a significant decline in hand hoeing time over time, had no adverse effect on economic outcomes. Most IWM combinations produced cotton yield comparable to the base program. However, the deep tillage–dicamba combination resulted in a 9% reduction. When costs were incorporated, cost-adjusted yields for the all-present, dicamba alone, and deep tillage–dicamba combinations were 5%–8% lower than the base program. Integration of a cover crop, except when combined with both deep tillage and dicamba, consistently resulted in cost-adjusted yield similar to the base program. While the progressive reduction in labor costs over time enhances zero tolerance practice's practicality as a foundational element within long-term IWM systems, the evaluated IWM practices, whether implemented individually or in combination, generally did not affect cotton yields, and many combinations, including those up to triplet levels, imposed no long-term economic burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of integrated weed management (IWM) practices in conventional management systems involves additional costs and can influence both short-term and long-term cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields, ultimately affecting economic viability. This study, conducted from fall 2018 to fall 2023 near Marianna, AR, evaluated four IWM practices in a large-plot, fixed-plot factorial design: zero tolerance for weed seed rain, soil inversion deep tillage every third year in the fall, a preplant terminated cereal rye cover crop, and dicamba-resistant cotton technology. Long-term economic impacts were assessed using the 5-year average cost-adjusted yield, with the base program (excluding all IWM practices) serving as the control. Zero tolerance did not influence cotton yield and, due to a significant decline in hand hoeing time over time, had no adverse effect on economic outcomes. Most IWM combinations produced cotton yield comparable to the base program. However, the deep tillage–dicamba combination resulted in a 9% reduction. When costs were incorporated, cost-adjusted yields for the all-present, dicamba alone, and deep tillage–dicamba combinations were 5%–8% lower than the base program. Integration of a cover crop, except when combined with both deep tillage and dicamba, consistently resulted in cost-adjusted yield similar to the base program. While the progressive reduction in labor costs over time enhances zero tolerance practice's practicality as a foundational element within long-term IWM systems, the evaluated IWM practices, whether implemented individually or in combination, generally did not affect cotton yields, and many combinations, including those up to triplet levels, imposed no long-term economic burden.

棉花杂草综合治理5年的产量和经济效益
在传统管理系统中实施综合杂草管理(IWM)做法涉及额外成本,并可能影响棉花(棉)的短期和长期产量,最终影响经济可行性。该研究于2018年秋季至2023年秋季在AR马里安娜附近进行,在大地块固定地块因子设计中评估了四种IWM实践:对杂草种子雨的零耐受,每三年秋季进行一次土壤翻转深耕,种植前终止谷物黑麦覆盖作物和抗麦草畏棉花技术。长期经济影响评估使用5年平均成本调整后的产量,以基本计划(不包括所有IWM实践)作为对照。零容忍不影响棉花产量,而且由于手工锄地时间随着时间的推移显著减少,对经济结果没有不利影响。大多数IWM组合的棉花产量与基本方案相当。然而,深耕-麦草畏组合导致9%的减少。考虑成本因素后,全施、单施麦草畏和深耕-麦草畏组合的成本调整产量比基础方案低5%-8%。综合覆盖作物,除了与深耕和麦草畏结合使用外,始终产生与基础方案相似的经成本调整的产量。虽然随着时间的推移,劳动力成本的逐步降低提高了零容忍实践作为长期综合综合管理系统的基本要素的实用性,但经过评估的综合综合管理实践,无论是单独实施还是组合实施,通常都不会影响棉花产量,而且许多组合,包括那些达到三重水平的组合,不会造成长期经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信