Energy communities typologies and performances: Impact of members configurations, system size and management

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Maria Victoria Gasca , Remy Rigo-Mariani , Vincent Debusschere , Yousra Sidqi
{"title":"Energy communities typologies and performances: Impact of members configurations, system size and management","authors":"Maria Victoria Gasca ,&nbsp;Remy Rigo-Mariani ,&nbsp;Vincent Debusschere ,&nbsp;Yousra Sidqi","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy communities have gained significant interest in recent years as they enable active citizen participation in the energy transition. Most research in energy communities delves into strategies for enhancing sustainability, economic viability, and fairness. However, these strategies’ effectiveness largely depends on each energy community’s specific characteristics, including members types and available assets. This study focuses on understanding the impact of input parameters across different energy community typologies. It examines community size, the percentage of prosumers, and the diversity of members’ power profiles, analyzing 24,000 distinct configurations derived from an initial dataset of 92 load profiles. The study evaluates multiple setups for individual choices of solar photovoltaic systems and energy storage assets. The assessment applies a collective optimal management strategy to compare self-consumption and potential energy bill savings against a baseline where end-users operate individually. The same management strategy is applied consistently across various energy community typologies to demonstrate that the outcomes are primarily determined by the diversity of inputs (i.e., the energy community’s specific characteristics) rather than the energy management approach itself. The results indicate that energy communities with more than 20 members do not experience significant performance enhancements, regardless of operational choices. Additionally, the findings highlight that diversifying member types is more beneficial than oversizing the generation and storage asset capacity. Ultimately, the results exhibit that energy communities with a percentage of only consumers yield favorable outcomes for all members. Optimal configurations are identified when the composition comprises 75% of prosumers with heterogeneous load profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484725003312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy communities have gained significant interest in recent years as they enable active citizen participation in the energy transition. Most research in energy communities delves into strategies for enhancing sustainability, economic viability, and fairness. However, these strategies’ effectiveness largely depends on each energy community’s specific characteristics, including members types and available assets. This study focuses on understanding the impact of input parameters across different energy community typologies. It examines community size, the percentage of prosumers, and the diversity of members’ power profiles, analyzing 24,000 distinct configurations derived from an initial dataset of 92 load profiles. The study evaluates multiple setups for individual choices of solar photovoltaic systems and energy storage assets. The assessment applies a collective optimal management strategy to compare self-consumption and potential energy bill savings against a baseline where end-users operate individually. The same management strategy is applied consistently across various energy community typologies to demonstrate that the outcomes are primarily determined by the diversity of inputs (i.e., the energy community’s specific characteristics) rather than the energy management approach itself. The results indicate that energy communities with more than 20 members do not experience significant performance enhancements, regardless of operational choices. Additionally, the findings highlight that diversifying member types is more beneficial than oversizing the generation and storage asset capacity. Ultimately, the results exhibit that energy communities with a percentage of only consumers yield favorable outcomes for all members. Optimal configurations are identified when the composition comprises 75% of prosumers with heterogeneous load profiles.
能源社区的类型和性能:成员配置、系统规模和管理的影响
近年来,能源社区获得了极大的关注,因为它们使公民积极参与能源转型。大多数关于能源社区的研究都是关于提高可持续性、经济可行性和公平性的策略。然而,这些策略的有效性在很大程度上取决于每个能源社区的具体特征,包括成员类型和可用资产。本研究的重点是了解输入参数对不同能源群落类型的影响。它检查了社区规模、生产消费者的百分比和成员电力配置的多样性,分析了来自92个负载配置的初始数据集的24,000种不同配置。该研究评估了太阳能光伏系统和能源存储资产的多种选择。该评估采用集体最优管理策略,将自我消耗和潜在的能源账单节省与最终用户单独操作的基线进行比较。相同的管理策略在各种能源社区类型中得到一致的应用,以证明结果主要取决于投入的多样性(即能源社区的具体特征),而不是能源管理方法本身。结果表明,无论选择何种运营方式,拥有超过20个成员的能源社区都没有显著的绩效提升。此外,研究结果强调,多样化的成员类型比过大的发电和存储资产容量更有益。最终,结果表明,只有一定比例的消费者的能源社区对所有成员都有利。当组合物包含75%具有异构负载概况的产消者时,确定了最佳配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信