Yue Wang , Biqin Dong , Jian-Guo Dai , Guannan Lu , Kaidi Peng , Yanshuai Wang
{"title":"Value-added recycling strategies for decommissioned wind turbine blades: A review","authors":"Yue Wang , Biqin Dong , Jian-Guo Dai , Guannan Lu , Kaidi Peng , Yanshuai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To meet global carbon reduction targets, countries are accelerating the development of wind energy through economic incentives. For example, the European Union plans to invest an estimated €800 billion in offshore wind by 2050, while China allocated approximately RMB 3.43 billion in wind power subsidies in 2024. These policy incentives have significantly driven the expansion of installed wind capacity, with the cumulative global capacity reaching 1133 GW by the end of 2024. However, this expansion has raised growing concerns regarding the disposal of decommissioned wind turbine blades (WTBs). The aim of this review is to propose that recycling strategies should be tailored for different parts of WTBs. Therefore, we classify them into eight categories based on material utilization. In addition, a novel standardized deconstruction method, “Vertical segmentation and horizontal slicing,” is proposed. Finally, the reuse potential of end-of-life WTBs in civil engineering and the main directions for future research are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 115950"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To meet global carbon reduction targets, countries are accelerating the development of wind energy through economic incentives. For example, the European Union plans to invest an estimated €800 billion in offshore wind by 2050, while China allocated approximately RMB 3.43 billion in wind power subsidies in 2024. These policy incentives have significantly driven the expansion of installed wind capacity, with the cumulative global capacity reaching 1133 GW by the end of 2024. However, this expansion has raised growing concerns regarding the disposal of decommissioned wind turbine blades (WTBs). The aim of this review is to propose that recycling strategies should be tailored for different parts of WTBs. Therefore, we classify them into eight categories based on material utilization. In addition, a novel standardized deconstruction method, “Vertical segmentation and horizontal slicing,” is proposed. Finally, the reuse potential of end-of-life WTBs in civil engineering and the main directions for future research are provided.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.