Mitigating hypothetical bias in choice Experiments: An in-depth review on the use of cheap talk

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Vilma Xhakollari , Daniele Asioli , Rodolfo M. Nayga
{"title":"Mitigating hypothetical bias in choice Experiments: An in-depth review on the use of cheap talk","authors":"Vilma Xhakollari ,&nbsp;Daniele Asioli ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2025.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cheap Talk is one of the most popular techniques used to mitigate hypothetical bias in choice experiments, but there is uncertainty about how it is used by researchers, and its effectiveness. We reviewed and explored in-depth how cheap talk is used and how effective it is in mitigating hypothetical bias by examining 172 articles in the literature using a systematic review. The results show that cheap talk is largely used in choice experiment studies, but only a minority of articles make the cheap talk scripts available to the readers. Furthermore, we found that there is a large heterogeneity on how the cheap talk script is used by researchers in terms of length, words used, structure, and its effectiveness. This review provides useful insights about the implementation of cheap talk in choice experiments as well as outline several future research avenues that could be useful in improving the validity and reliability of data collected using hypothetical choice experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534525000247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cheap Talk is one of the most popular techniques used to mitigate hypothetical bias in choice experiments, but there is uncertainty about how it is used by researchers, and its effectiveness. We reviewed and explored in-depth how cheap talk is used and how effective it is in mitigating hypothetical bias by examining 172 articles in the literature using a systematic review. The results show that cheap talk is largely used in choice experiment studies, but only a minority of articles make the cheap talk scripts available to the readers. Furthermore, we found that there is a large heterogeneity on how the cheap talk script is used by researchers in terms of length, words used, structure, and its effectiveness. This review provides useful insights about the implementation of cheap talk in choice experiments as well as outline several future research avenues that could be useful in improving the validity and reliability of data collected using hypothetical choice experiments.
减轻选择实验中的假设偏差:对廉价话语使用的深入回顾
在选择实验中,廉价谈话是用来减轻假设偏差的最流行的技术之一,但研究人员如何使用它以及它的有效性存在不确定性。我们通过对文献中的172篇文章进行系统回顾,回顾并深入探讨了廉价言论是如何被使用的,以及它在减轻假设偏见方面的效果如何。结果表明,在选择实验研究中,廉价谈话被大量使用,但只有少数文章将廉价谈话脚本提供给读者。此外,我们发现研究人员在使用廉价谈话脚本的长度、使用的单词、结构和有效性方面存在很大的异质性。这篇综述提供了关于在选择实验中实施廉价谈话的有用见解,并概述了几个未来的研究途径,这些途径可能有助于提高使用假设选择实验收集的数据的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信