Avery Claire Gil , Onur Kadioglu , G. Frans Currier , Farah Masood , Helder Baldi Jacob
{"title":"Development of a systematic checklist for reviewing cone-beam computed tomography images in an orthodontic population","authors":"Avery Claire Gil , Onur Kadioglu , G. Frans Currier , Farah Masood , Helder Baldi Jacob","doi":"10.1016/j.xaor.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to create a comprehensive checklist for common incidental findings (IFs) in an orthodontic population to assist orthodontists in interpreting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 475 out of 479 consecutive CBCT images were retrospectively reviewed. The images were divided into 6 easily identifiable zones using landmarks and reference planes orthodontists commonly used for treatment planning. Findings were further classified into variations of normal anatomy, IFs, and IFs that may be considered for referral to a radiologist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2248 IFs were reported in the 475 CBCT scans (4.7 findings/scan). Zone 3, which includes the maxilla, presented the most findings (56.5%), followed by zone 5 (22.9%), which includes the mandible, zone 6 (7.0%), zone 2 (6.6%), zone 4 (5.3%), and zone 1 (1.7%). Most findings were normal variations in anatomy (62.2%). The most common finding was impacted teeth (18.8%) and concha bullosa (8.9%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the high frequency of IFs in large field of view CBCT images in an orthodontic patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72140,"journal":{"name":"AJO-DO clinical companion","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO-DO clinical companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666430525000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to create a comprehensive checklist for common incidental findings (IFs) in an orthodontic population to assist orthodontists in interpreting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Methods
A total of 475 out of 479 consecutive CBCT images were retrospectively reviewed. The images were divided into 6 easily identifiable zones using landmarks and reference planes orthodontists commonly used for treatment planning. Findings were further classified into variations of normal anatomy, IFs, and IFs that may be considered for referral to a radiologist.
Results
A total of 2248 IFs were reported in the 475 CBCT scans (4.7 findings/scan). Zone 3, which includes the maxilla, presented the most findings (56.5%), followed by zone 5 (22.9%), which includes the mandible, zone 6 (7.0%), zone 2 (6.6%), zone 4 (5.3%), and zone 1 (1.7%). Most findings were normal variations in anatomy (62.2%). The most common finding was impacted teeth (18.8%) and concha bullosa (8.9%).
Conclusions
This study underscores the high frequency of IFs in large field of view CBCT images in an orthodontic patient population.