Enhancing career development for biomedical sciences Students: Leveraging simulations to support patient-facing careers

IF 1.7 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Komal Amar , Matthew Jones , Nathan Connell , Daniel Mayo , Lee Forde , Berna S. Sayan , Ale Lorente-Pons , Rachael N. Magwaza , Andrea Giachino , Niroshini Nirmalan , Sara Namvar
{"title":"Enhancing career development for biomedical sciences Students: Leveraging simulations to support patient-facing careers","authors":"Komal Amar ,&nbsp;Matthew Jones ,&nbsp;Nathan Connell ,&nbsp;Daniel Mayo ,&nbsp;Lee Forde ,&nbsp;Berna S. Sayan ,&nbsp;Ale Lorente-Pons ,&nbsp;Rachael N. Magwaza ,&nbsp;Andrea Giachino ,&nbsp;Niroshini Nirmalan ,&nbsp;Sara Namvar","doi":"10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Simulations have become integral to medical education for professions such as nursing and medicine but are still a rare opportunity for students undertaking basic science courses including Biomedical Sciences. Many students undertaking Biomedical Sciences have a strong underlying interest in pursuing careers at the patient bedside. In this regard, Biomedical Science students often hope to secure competitive places on postgraduate courses in medicine, or physician associate studies. At the University of Salford, a significant number of students come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. These students may face additional barriers to academic confidence and a sense of belonging, which can affect their ability to competitively pursue postgraduate opportunities in medicine and related fields. Providing immersive learning experiences, such as clinical simulations, can help bridge this gap by fostering essential skills, increasing confidence, and enhancing employability.</div><div>We set out to design clinical scenarios that would develop transferable skills, especially around patient consultation, teamwork and ethical decision making. Four clinical scenarios were designed and delivered in the University of Salford state-of-the-art simulations suite. Scenarios included a lung cancer patient consultation, decision making around a liver transplant dilemma, a difficult conversation with a parent regarding safeguarding concerns, and finally an escape-game style scenario involving a zombie virus infection. These scenarios involved students becoming familiar with the ethical pillars for clinical decision making, frameworks for patient consultations, and the basics of clinical observations. We evaluated the student experience using a Likert survey.</div><div>Over a two-year period, a total of 60 students took part in the extracurricular simulation, of which 31 agreed to take part in the research survey. Results showed that the experience was largely accessed by students from widening participation backgrounds. In total, 97 % had a positive learning experience, and 100 % enjoyed taking part in the clinical simulation. We found that 90 % of students felt the experience supported the development of communication skills and teamwork, whilst 84 % reported improved employability. Furthermore, 90 % of students in this study would like to see simulation experiences embedded into their programme of study, and 91 % thought that simulations were better than traditional dyadic styles.</div><div>Collectively, these results point to the successful design and delivery of an extracurricular simulated experience and provide evidence to support the need to embed immersive simulated experiences into the curriculum of Biomedical Sciences courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72753,"journal":{"name":"Current research in physiology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944125000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulations have become integral to medical education for professions such as nursing and medicine but are still a rare opportunity for students undertaking basic science courses including Biomedical Sciences. Many students undertaking Biomedical Sciences have a strong underlying interest in pursuing careers at the patient bedside. In this regard, Biomedical Science students often hope to secure competitive places on postgraduate courses in medicine, or physician associate studies. At the University of Salford, a significant number of students come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. These students may face additional barriers to academic confidence and a sense of belonging, which can affect their ability to competitively pursue postgraduate opportunities in medicine and related fields. Providing immersive learning experiences, such as clinical simulations, can help bridge this gap by fostering essential skills, increasing confidence, and enhancing employability.
We set out to design clinical scenarios that would develop transferable skills, especially around patient consultation, teamwork and ethical decision making. Four clinical scenarios were designed and delivered in the University of Salford state-of-the-art simulations suite. Scenarios included a lung cancer patient consultation, decision making around a liver transplant dilemma, a difficult conversation with a parent regarding safeguarding concerns, and finally an escape-game style scenario involving a zombie virus infection. These scenarios involved students becoming familiar with the ethical pillars for clinical decision making, frameworks for patient consultations, and the basics of clinical observations. We evaluated the student experience using a Likert survey.
Over a two-year period, a total of 60 students took part in the extracurricular simulation, of which 31 agreed to take part in the research survey. Results showed that the experience was largely accessed by students from widening participation backgrounds. In total, 97 % had a positive learning experience, and 100 % enjoyed taking part in the clinical simulation. We found that 90 % of students felt the experience supported the development of communication skills and teamwork, whilst 84 % reported improved employability. Furthermore, 90 % of students in this study would like to see simulation experiences embedded into their programme of study, and 91 % thought that simulations were better than traditional dyadic styles.
Collectively, these results point to the successful design and delivery of an extracurricular simulated experience and provide evidence to support the need to embed immersive simulated experiences into the curriculum of Biomedical Sciences courses.
加强生物医学专业学生的职业发展:利用模拟来支持面向患者的职业
模拟已经成为护理和医学等专业医学教育不可或缺的一部分,但对于包括生物医学在内的基础科学课程的学生来说,模拟仍然是一个难得的机会。许多从事生物医学科学的学生对在病人床边从事职业有着强烈的潜在兴趣。在这方面,生物医学专业的学生通常希望在医学研究生课程或医师助理研究中获得有竞争力的位置。在索尔福德大学,相当多的学生来自较低的社会经济背景。这些学生在学术自信和归属感方面可能面临额外的障碍,这可能会影响他们在医学和相关领域竞争研究生机会的能力。提供身临其境的学习体验,如临床模拟,可以通过培养基本技能、增强信心和提高就业能力来帮助弥合这一差距。我们开始设计临床场景,以培养可转移的技能,特别是在患者咨询、团队合作和道德决策方面。在索尔福德大学最先进的模拟套件中设计并交付了四个临床场景。场景包括肺癌患者咨询,围绕肝脏移植困境做出决定,与父母就保护问题进行艰难的对话,最后是涉及僵尸病毒感染的逃脱游戏式场景。这些场景使学生熟悉临床决策的伦理支柱、患者咨询框架和临床观察的基础。我们使用李克特调查来评估学生的体验。在两年的时间里,共有60名学生参加了课外模拟,其中31名学生同意参加研究调查。结果显示,获得这种体验的学生大多来自广泛的参与背景。总的来说,97%的人有积极的学习经历,100%的人喜欢参加临床模拟。我们发现,90%的学生认为这种经历有助于沟通技巧和团队合作的发展,而84%的学生认为这种经历提高了他们的就业能力。此外,在这项研究中,90%的学生希望看到模拟体验嵌入到他们的学习计划中,91%的学生认为模拟比传统的二元模式更好。总的来说,这些结果表明课外模拟体验的成功设计和交付,并为将沉浸式模拟体验嵌入生物医学科学课程的必要性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信