Imaging of cartilage, meniscus, and beyond: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT)

Patrick Omoumi
{"title":"Imaging of cartilage, meniscus, and beyond: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT)","authors":"Patrick Omoumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains the reference standard for imaging cartilage and meniscus, offering superior soft tissue contrast essential for comprehensive joint assessment in osteoarthritis (OA). However, recent technological advancements in Computed Tomography (CT)—spectral imaging, and weight-bearing scanners—have sparked renewed interest in utilizing CT, and CT arthrography in the evaluation of OA. This narrative mini-review explores the strengths and limitations of both MRI and CT in imaging cartilage and meniscus, and presents some trends in the research setting.</div><div>MRI remains the modality of choice for joint imaging, offering excellent soft tissue contrast and comprehensive articular assessment. CT is the reference for the assessment of mineralized tissue imaging, and in association with arthrography (CT arthrography, CTA), provides high performance in the diagnosis of surface lesions.</div><div>In the research setting, efforts have focused on the acceleration of MRI acquisitions, with deep learning reconstructions disrupting the traditional trade-off between acquisition speed and image quality. Efforts are undertaken to standardize compositional MRI techniques, which probe early-stage biochemical tissular changes. Emerging techniques such as synthetic imaging may offer the ability to provide information on bone and soft tissues in a single acquisition. Weight-bearing acquisitions have allowed the assessment of joint structures, in particular menisci, in a loaded position. Photon-counting CT promises higher resolution, improved material separation without increasing radiation exposure. Finally, post-processing tools are being developed to leverage large quantities of data and integrate both modalities in a complementary framework that could provide a robust toolset for the assessment of OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265412500008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains the reference standard for imaging cartilage and meniscus, offering superior soft tissue contrast essential for comprehensive joint assessment in osteoarthritis (OA). However, recent technological advancements in Computed Tomography (CT)—spectral imaging, and weight-bearing scanners—have sparked renewed interest in utilizing CT, and CT arthrography in the evaluation of OA. This narrative mini-review explores the strengths and limitations of both MRI and CT in imaging cartilage and meniscus, and presents some trends in the research setting.
MRI remains the modality of choice for joint imaging, offering excellent soft tissue contrast and comprehensive articular assessment. CT is the reference for the assessment of mineralized tissue imaging, and in association with arthrography (CT arthrography, CTA), provides high performance in the diagnosis of surface lesions.
In the research setting, efforts have focused on the acceleration of MRI acquisitions, with deep learning reconstructions disrupting the traditional trade-off between acquisition speed and image quality. Efforts are undertaken to standardize compositional MRI techniques, which probe early-stage biochemical tissular changes. Emerging techniques such as synthetic imaging may offer the ability to provide information on bone and soft tissues in a single acquisition. Weight-bearing acquisitions have allowed the assessment of joint structures, in particular menisci, in a loaded position. Photon-counting CT promises higher resolution, improved material separation without increasing radiation exposure. Finally, post-processing tools are being developed to leverage large quantities of data and integrate both modalities in a complementary framework that could provide a robust toolset for the assessment of OA.
软骨、半月板及其他部位的成像:磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)的作用
磁共振成像(MRI)仍然是软骨和半月板成像的参考标准,为骨关节炎(OA)的综合关节评估提供了优越的软组织对比。然而,最近计算机断层扫描(CT)的技术进步——光谱成像和负重扫描仪——重新激发了人们对利用CT和CT关节造影评估OA的兴趣。这篇叙述性的综述探讨了MRI和CT在软骨和半月板成像方面的优势和局限性,并提出了一些研究方向。MRI仍然是关节成像的首选方式,提供出色的软组织对比和全面的关节评估。CT是评估矿化组织成像的参考,并与关节摄影(CT关节摄影,CTA)相结合,在诊断表面病变方面提供了高性能。在研究环境中,努力的重点是加速MRI采集,深度学习重建打破了传统的采集速度和图像质量之间的权衡。努力进行标准化组成MRI技术,探测早期生化组织的变化。新兴技术,如合成成像,可以在一次采集中提供有关骨骼和软组织的信息。负重检查可以评估关节结构,特别是处于负荷位置的半月板。光子计数CT有望在不增加辐射暴露的情况下提高分辨率,改善材料分离。最后,正在开发后处理工具,以利用大量数据并将这两种模式整合到一个互补框架中,从而为评估OA提供一个强大的工具集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信