Genicular artery embolization and nerve ablation: Interventional radiology solutions for osteoarthritis related knee pain

Sheikh Muhammad Usman Shami , Nobuhiko Hata , Yan Epelboym
{"title":"Genicular artery embolization and nerve ablation: Interventional radiology solutions for osteoarthritis related knee pain","authors":"Sheikh Muhammad Usman Shami ,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Hata ,&nbsp;Yan Epelboym","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of chronic knee pain, with treatment options ranging from conservative therapies to total knee replacement. Minimally invasive, image-guided interventions such as genicular artery embolization (GAE) and genicular nerve ablation (GNA) have emerged as alternatives for patients with refractory OA-related pain. This review explores these techniques and the role of interventional radiologists in multidisciplinary OA management.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of GAE and GNA. GAE selectively embolizes genicular arteries supplying the knee joint and synovium, reducing synovitis by targeting abnormal neovascularity and hyperemia. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance and clinical studies have reported significant improvements in pain. GNA can be performed with ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This technique utilizes radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to denervate sensory nerves thereby alleviating knee pain. Conventional, pulsed, and cooled RFA techniques are available and have demonstrated neuro-ablative effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>GAE and GNA have demonstrated high technical and clinical success, with significant reductions in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and other patient reported outcome measures. Pain relief usually lasts from 6 to 12 months, with GAE benefits reported up to 24 months. Both procedures exhibit favorable safety profiles, with mostly mild, self-limiting adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>GAE and GNA are effective minimally invasive options for patients who are not candidates for or unwilling to undergo knee replacement. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm long-term efficacy for these interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265412500011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of chronic knee pain, with treatment options ranging from conservative therapies to total knee replacement. Minimally invasive, image-guided interventions such as genicular artery embolization (GAE) and genicular nerve ablation (GNA) have emerged as alternatives for patients with refractory OA-related pain. This review explores these techniques and the role of interventional radiologists in multidisciplinary OA management.

Design

This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of GAE and GNA. GAE selectively embolizes genicular arteries supplying the knee joint and synovium, reducing synovitis by targeting abnormal neovascularity and hyperemia. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance and clinical studies have reported significant improvements in pain. GNA can be performed with ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This technique utilizes radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to denervate sensory nerves thereby alleviating knee pain. Conventional, pulsed, and cooled RFA techniques are available and have demonstrated neuro-ablative effects.

Results

GAE and GNA have demonstrated high technical and clinical success, with significant reductions in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and other patient reported outcome measures. Pain relief usually lasts from 6 to 12 months, with GAE benefits reported up to 24 months. Both procedures exhibit favorable safety profiles, with mostly mild, self-limiting adverse events.

Conclusion

GAE and GNA are effective minimally invasive options for patients who are not candidates for or unwilling to undergo knee replacement. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm long-term efficacy for these interventions.
膝动脉栓塞和神经消融:骨关节炎相关膝关节疼痛的介入放射学解决方案
目的骨关节炎(OA)是慢性膝关节疼痛的主要原因,治疗选择从保守治疗到全膝关节置换术。微创,图像引导的干预措施,如膝动脉栓塞(GAE)和膝神经消融(GNA)已成为难治性oa相关疼痛患者的替代方案。这篇综述探讨了这些技术以及介入放射科医师在多学科OA管理中的作用。本综述综合了GAE和GNA的安全性、有效性和技术方面的现有证据。GAE选择性地栓塞供应膝关节和滑膜的膝动脉,通过靶向异常的新生血管和充血来减轻滑膜炎。该手术是在透视指导下进行的,临床研究报告了疼痛的显着改善。GNA可在超声或透视引导下进行。该技术利用射频消融术(RFA)去神经感觉神经,从而减轻膝关节疼痛。传统的、脉冲的和冷却的射频消融技术是可用的,并且已经证明了神经消融的效果。结果gae和GNA在技术和临床方面取得了很高的成功,显著降低了视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及其他患者报告的结果测量。疼痛缓解通常持续6至12个月,据报道GAE的益处可达24个月。这两种方法都表现出良好的安全性,大多是轻微的、自限性的不良事件。结论对于不适合或不愿接受膝关节置换术的患者,ae和GNA是一种有效的微创选择。需要进一步的随机安慰剂对照试验来证实这些干预措施的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信