Jiahai Yuan , Yao Wang , Ying Wang , Yuanxin Liu , Jian Zhang , Haonan Zhang
{"title":"Network optimization and deployment for carbon capture and storage in China's coal-fired power plants","authors":"Jiahai Yuan , Yao Wang , Ying Wang , Yuanxin Liu , Jian Zhang , Haonan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The low-carbon energy transition and sustainable development are crucial for addressing global climate change. As the only technology currently capable of achieving large-scale decarbonization of fossil fuels, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is essential, especially for China, which heavily relies on coal-fired power generation. This study proposes a novel method for optimizing the network of coal-fired power plants equipped with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. To address the needs of China's transition strategy and industrial policy, we investigate the deployment trajectories of coal-fired power plants with CCS under different carbon quota constraints and various coal-fired power development scenarios. We found that, depending on future transition scenarios, the deployment scale of CCS coal-fired power plants ranges from 33.26 GW to 406.4 GW. Specifically, around 30 GW–60 GW will need to be deployed by 2035, with an additional 70 GW–150 GW required by 2050. Failure to accelerate early deployment could significantly increase the pressure on the coal power sector to reduce emissions and hinder the overall carbon reduction process in China. The coal-fired units needing retrofitting are primarily concentrated in the 'Three North' regions, and with larger deployment scales, this will gradually spread to Central and Eastern China. Inner Mongolia, Shandong, and Xinjiang will bear the highest capture cost expenditures. The total length of CO<sub>2</sub> transportation pipelines may reach up to 25 thousand km, with many pipelines requiring cross-provincial or cross-regional construction. Lastly, based on the findings of this study, development suggestions are proposed for advancing coal power CCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The low-carbon energy transition and sustainable development are crucial for addressing global climate change. As the only technology currently capable of achieving large-scale decarbonization of fossil fuels, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is essential, especially for China, which heavily relies on coal-fired power generation. This study proposes a novel method for optimizing the network of coal-fired power plants equipped with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. To address the needs of China's transition strategy and industrial policy, we investigate the deployment trajectories of coal-fired power plants with CCS under different carbon quota constraints and various coal-fired power development scenarios. We found that, depending on future transition scenarios, the deployment scale of CCS coal-fired power plants ranges from 33.26 GW to 406.4 GW. Specifically, around 30 GW–60 GW will need to be deployed by 2035, with an additional 70 GW–150 GW required by 2050. Failure to accelerate early deployment could significantly increase the pressure on the coal power sector to reduce emissions and hinder the overall carbon reduction process in China. The coal-fired units needing retrofitting are primarily concentrated in the 'Three North' regions, and with larger deployment scales, this will gradually spread to Central and Eastern China. Inner Mongolia, Shandong, and Xinjiang will bear the highest capture cost expenditures. The total length of CO2 transportation pipelines may reach up to 25 thousand km, with many pipelines requiring cross-provincial or cross-regional construction. Lastly, based on the findings of this study, development suggestions are proposed for advancing coal power CCS.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.