Can reference-dependent loss aversion explain choice behaviour?

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Inmaculada R. Puerta , José Luis Pinto
{"title":"Can reference-dependent loss aversion explain choice behaviour?","authors":"Inmaculada R. Puerta ,&nbsp;José Luis Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the extent to which reference-dependent loss aversion, on its own, can explain choice behaviour under risk. To this end, a model of preferences over monetary lotteries and a rule of endogenous reference points are developed. The model is characterised by a new property of reference-dependent loss aversion. It is reduced to the expected value when the reference point is invariant across choices and satisfies first-order stochastic dominance. Our findings highlight the crucial role of loss aversion in explaining risk attitudes. In particular, the results show that the change in the reference point could be responsible for the observed well-known choice patterns, such as the common consequence effect and the common ratio effect, as well as for their reverse effects. The model predicts this behaviour by making use of only one function that weights losses with a value that increases with the reference point. Neither a probability weighting function nor a specific functional form for the utility of outcomes is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which reference-dependent loss aversion, on its own, can explain choice behaviour under risk. To this end, a model of preferences over monetary lotteries and a rule of endogenous reference points are developed. The model is characterised by a new property of reference-dependent loss aversion. It is reduced to the expected value when the reference point is invariant across choices and satisfies first-order stochastic dominance. Our findings highlight the crucial role of loss aversion in explaining risk attitudes. In particular, the results show that the change in the reference point could be responsible for the observed well-known choice patterns, such as the common consequence effect and the common ratio effect, as well as for their reverse effects. The model predicts this behaviour by making use of only one function that weights losses with a value that increases with the reference point. Neither a probability weighting function nor a specific functional form for the utility of outcomes is required.
参照依赖的损失厌恶能解释选择行为吗?
本文考察了依赖参考的损失厌恶在多大程度上可以解释风险下的选择行为。为此目的,开发了对货币彩票的偏好模型和内生参考点规则。该模型具有参考依赖损失厌恶的新特性。当参考点在不同的选择中不变且满足一阶随机优势时,它被简化为期望值。我们的研究结果强调了损失厌恶在解释风险态度中的关键作用。特别是,研究结果表明,参考点的变化可能导致已知的选择模式,如共同后果效应和共同比率效应,以及它们的反向效应。该模型通过仅使用一个函数来预测这种行为,该函数使用随参考点增加的值来加权损失。既不需要概率加权函数,也不需要结果效用的特定函数形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信