{"title":"Can reference-dependent loss aversion explain choice behaviour?","authors":"Inmaculada R. Puerta , José Luis Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the extent to which reference-dependent loss aversion, on its own, can explain choice behaviour under risk. To this end, a model of preferences over monetary lotteries and a rule of endogenous reference points are developed. The model is characterised by a new property of reference-dependent loss aversion. It is reduced to the expected value when the reference point is invariant across choices and satisfies first-order stochastic dominance. Our findings highlight the crucial role of loss aversion in explaining risk attitudes. In particular, the results show that the change in the reference point could be responsible for the observed well-known choice patterns, such as the common consequence effect and the common ratio effect, as well as for their reverse effects. The model predicts this behaviour by making use of only one function that weights losses with a value that increases with the reference point. Neither a probability weighting function nor a specific functional form for the utility of outcomes is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the extent to which reference-dependent loss aversion, on its own, can explain choice behaviour under risk. To this end, a model of preferences over monetary lotteries and a rule of endogenous reference points are developed. The model is characterised by a new property of reference-dependent loss aversion. It is reduced to the expected value when the reference point is invariant across choices and satisfies first-order stochastic dominance. Our findings highlight the crucial role of loss aversion in explaining risk attitudes. In particular, the results show that the change in the reference point could be responsible for the observed well-known choice patterns, such as the common consequence effect and the common ratio effect, as well as for their reverse effects. The model predicts this behaviour by making use of only one function that weights losses with a value that increases with the reference point. Neither a probability weighting function nor a specific functional form for the utility of outcomes is required.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.