Short report: Surrogacy reforms in the Netherlands

Q3 Medicine
A. den Exter
{"title":"Short report: Surrogacy reforms in the Netherlands","authors":"A. den Exter","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In July 2023, a revised draft Law regulating non-commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands was presented to Parliament. The Bill aims to create greater legal certainty for the surrogate mother and intended parents while emphasising the child’s best interests. Key elements of the proposal include: 'surrogacy agreements' that are recorded prior to conception and submitted to the court for approval, and the child’s right to information about parentage. To facilitate this right, a register will be established containing the donor details, information about the surrogate mother, details regarding domestic and foreign adoption, and other general information about biological parentage.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This brief report examines the proposed normative framework for regulating surrogacy arrangements in the Netherlands from a legal perspective, questioning whether it provides greater legal certainty for the surrogate mother and intended parents.</div></div><div><h3>Results/discussion</h3><div>Key elements of the surrogacy bill are the non-commercial character of surrogacy, judicial review of the surrogacy agreement, and the child's right to parentage information. This draft Law complies with the protective interests of the child under Article 8 of the ECHR and various provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It also guarantees the reproductive autonomy of the surrogate mother and her right to protection against exploitation. For the intended parents, on the other hand, there is no absolute human rights protection for having a child. In this sense, there is no right of access to surrogacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The bill leaves some questions unanswered, which would be better addressed by judicial discretion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In July 2023, a revised draft Law regulating non-commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands was presented to Parliament. The Bill aims to create greater legal certainty for the surrogate mother and intended parents while emphasising the child’s best interests. Key elements of the proposal include: 'surrogacy agreements' that are recorded prior to conception and submitted to the court for approval, and the child’s right to information about parentage. To facilitate this right, a register will be established containing the donor details, information about the surrogate mother, details regarding domestic and foreign adoption, and other general information about biological parentage.

Methodology

This brief report examines the proposed normative framework for regulating surrogacy arrangements in the Netherlands from a legal perspective, questioning whether it provides greater legal certainty for the surrogate mother and intended parents.

Results/discussion

Key elements of the surrogacy bill are the non-commercial character of surrogacy, judicial review of the surrogacy agreement, and the child's right to parentage information. This draft Law complies with the protective interests of the child under Article 8 of the ECHR and various provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It also guarantees the reproductive autonomy of the surrogate mother and her right to protection against exploitation. For the intended parents, on the other hand, there is no absolute human rights protection for having a child. In this sense, there is no right of access to surrogacy.

Conclusion

The bill leaves some questions unanswered, which would be better addressed by judicial discretion.
简短报道:荷兰的代孕改革
2023年7月,荷兰向议会提交了一份修订后的关于非商业代孕的法律草案。该法案旨在为代孕母亲和准父母创造更大的法律确定性,同时强调孩子的最大利益。该提案的关键内容包括:“代孕协议”要在受孕前记录下来,并提交法院批准,以及孩子有权了解父母的身份。为了促进这一权利,将建立一个登记册,其中载有捐助者的详细资料、代孕母亲的资料、国内和国外收养的详细资料以及其他关于亲生父母的一般资料。这篇简短的报告从法律的角度审视了拟议的规范框架,以规范荷兰的代孕安排,质疑它是否为代孕母亲和准父母提供了更大的法律确定性。结果/讨论代孕法案的关键要素是代孕的非商业性质,代孕协议的司法审查,以及孩子获得亲子信息的权利。该法律草案符合《欧洲人权公约》第8条和《儿童权利公约》关于保护儿童利益的各项规定。它还保障代孕母亲的生殖自主权和保护她不受剥削的权利。另一方面,对于准父母来说,生孩子没有绝对的人权保护。从这个意义上说,没有权利获得代孕。结论该法案留下了一些悬而未决的问题,这些问题最好通过司法自由裁量权来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信