Demographic Reporting of Students and Implementation Teams in School-Based Single-Case Research for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Systematic Review

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Ashley Rila, Seth A. King, Allison L. Bruhn, Sara Estrapala
{"title":"Demographic Reporting of Students and Implementation Teams in School-Based Single-Case Research for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ashley Rila, Seth A. King, Allison L. Bruhn, Sara Estrapala","doi":"10.1177/10983007251335369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing the extent to which interventions might generalize involves an understanding of for whom and in what contexts interventions have succeeded. Identifying the characteristics of service recipients as well as observers, teachers, and other members of implementation teams involved in intervention research represents an emerging consideration in special education literature involving single-case designs. In addition, the effectiveness of interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) may be influenced by cultural, linguistic, and economic differences between students and interventionists. This review describes the characteristics of students with EBD and implementation teams featured in single-case design behavior intervention studies published in nine special education journals from 2000 to 2020. Screening of available studies ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 4,877) resulted in a sample of 140 articles. Reports of student demographic data were high (66.4%–98.6% of articles depending on the variable); however, authors typically did not describe students’ socioeconomic status (SES). Information regarding implementation teams varied from 1.4% to 46% of articles depending on the variable. Implications for future research follows a discussion of findings.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007251335369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the extent to which interventions might generalize involves an understanding of for whom and in what contexts interventions have succeeded. Identifying the characteristics of service recipients as well as observers, teachers, and other members of implementation teams involved in intervention research represents an emerging consideration in special education literature involving single-case designs. In addition, the effectiveness of interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) may be influenced by cultural, linguistic, and economic differences between students and interventionists. This review describes the characteristics of students with EBD and implementation teams featured in single-case design behavior intervention studies published in nine special education journals from 2000 to 2020. Screening of available studies ( n = 4,877) resulted in a sample of 140 articles. Reports of student demographic data were high (66.4%–98.6% of articles depending on the variable); however, authors typically did not describe students’ socioeconomic status (SES). Information regarding implementation teams varied from 1.4% to 46% of articles depending on the variable. Implications for future research follows a discussion of findings.
在以学校为基础的学生情绪和行为障碍个案研究中,学生人口统计报告和实施小组:系统回顾
评估干预措施可能普遍化的程度涉及了解干预措施对谁以及在什么情况下取得了成功。在涉及个案设计的特殊教育文献中,识别服务接受者、观察员、教师和参与干预研究的实施团队其他成员的特征是一种新兴的考虑。此外,干预学生情绪和行为障碍(EBD)的有效性可能受到学生和干预者之间的文化、语言和经济差异的影响。本综述描述了2000年至2020年在9份特殊教育期刊上发表的单案例设计行为干预研究中EBD学生和实施团队的特征。对现有研究(n = 4,877)的筛选结果是140篇文章的样本。学生人口统计数据的报告很高(66.4%-98.6%,取决于变量);然而,作者通常没有描述学生的社会经济地位(SES)。根据变量的不同,关于实现团队的信息从1.4%到46%不等。对研究结果的讨论对未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信