Yuxi Lu , Rong Chen , Weijun Zhao , Peng Zhang , Shukui Zhu , Chenglong Yu , Songhu Yuan
{"title":"Accurate and simple determination of sediment redox capacity by a modified chemical probe method: Implications to contaminant remediation","authors":"Yuxi Lu , Rong Chen , Weijun Zhao , Peng Zhang , Shukui Zhu , Chenglong Yu , Songhu Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment redox capacity reflected by electron-accepting/donating capacity (EAC/EDC) affects biogeochemical processes and contaminant transformation in the subsurface. However, the traditional chemical probe method for determining sediment EAC/EDC has limited accuracy, and the high-precision mediated electrochemical method is unsuitable for analyzing heterogeneous sediment due to its low sample dosage. This study presents a modified chemical probe method employing two radical ions, ethyl viologen radical (•EV<sup>+</sup>) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical (•ABTS<sup>-</sup>), to measure EAC and EDC, respectively. The accuracy was verified using FeSO<sub>4</sub> and Fe(OH)<sub>3</sub> standards, as well as various iron/manganese minerals and natural organic matter. The recovery for EAC and EDC analysis across 18 different sediment samples were 102.1 ± 5.9 % and 95.4 ± 5 %, respectively. Detection limits were comparable to those of the mediated electrochemical method, but 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than those of the traditional chemical probe method. The reaction time between •EV<sup>+</sup>/•ABTS<sup>-</sup> and sediment was 15 min, much shorter than those reported for previous methods (2–24 h). Method applications suggest that the modified chemical probe method can accurately characterize the vertical distribution of riparian sediment redox capacity, and the initial EAC/EDC of sediments can predict the capacities for hexavalent chromium reduction, organic carbon mineralization and persulfate consumption in sediment systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 124014"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425009224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sediment redox capacity reflected by electron-accepting/donating capacity (EAC/EDC) affects biogeochemical processes and contaminant transformation in the subsurface. However, the traditional chemical probe method for determining sediment EAC/EDC has limited accuracy, and the high-precision mediated electrochemical method is unsuitable for analyzing heterogeneous sediment due to its low sample dosage. This study presents a modified chemical probe method employing two radical ions, ethyl viologen radical (•EV+) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical (•ABTS-), to measure EAC and EDC, respectively. The accuracy was verified using FeSO4 and Fe(OH)3 standards, as well as various iron/manganese minerals and natural organic matter. The recovery for EAC and EDC analysis across 18 different sediment samples were 102.1 ± 5.9 % and 95.4 ± 5 %, respectively. Detection limits were comparable to those of the mediated electrochemical method, but 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than those of the traditional chemical probe method. The reaction time between •EV+/•ABTS- and sediment was 15 min, much shorter than those reported for previous methods (2–24 h). Method applications suggest that the modified chemical probe method can accurately characterize the vertical distribution of riparian sediment redox capacity, and the initial EAC/EDC of sediments can predict the capacities for hexavalent chromium reduction, organic carbon mineralization and persulfate consumption in sediment systems.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.