Robotic liver transplantation: University of modena experience.

Paolo Magistri, Roberta Odorizzi, Barbara Catellani, Cristiano Guidetti, Giuseppe Esposito, Giacomo Assirati, Tiziana Olivieri, Gian Piero Guerrini, Stefano Di Sandro, Fabrizio Di Benedetto
{"title":"Robotic liver transplantation: University of modena experience.","authors":"Paolo Magistri, Roberta Odorizzi, Barbara Catellani, Cristiano Guidetti, Giuseppe Esposito, Giacomo Assirati, Tiziana Olivieri, Gian Piero Guerrini, Stefano Di Sandro, Fabrizio Di Benedetto","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques for solid organ transplantation are well established in kidney transplantation, whereas progress in liver transplantation (LT) has been comparatively slower. The transition to a fully minimally invasive approach for LT has required a gradual, stepwise development, significantly accelerated by the introduction of robotic technology. We herein report the largest series of whole graft robotic liver transplantation and provide preliminary observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective, single-arm, single-center analysis of patients who underwent fully robotic total hepatectomy followed by robotic liver transplantation (RLT) between January and December 2024. The primary aim was to assess short-term outcomes, including the incidence of complications, early allograft failure (EAF) using the EASE score, primary non-function (PNF), and both graft and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients underwent RLT in the study period. Median age of the recipients in the study group was 63 (56-71), with a median BMI of 26 Kg/m2 (range 21-32) and 80% of ASA score of 2. Median MELD was 8.5 (6-25), 80% of the cases were in Child class A , 40% had a clinically significant portal hypertension. No cases of high-grade morbidity (Clavien >3a) occurred at 30 days, nor readmissions. After a median follow-up of 10.6 months all patients are alive and in good general conditions, graft survival is 100% and liver function is optimal in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The robotic approach to liver transplantation has demonstrated feasibility and promising short-term outcomes. However, extended follow-up is required to confirm these results over the long term with the aim to confirm outcomes comparable to benchmark results of open transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520704,"journal":{"name":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques for solid organ transplantation are well established in kidney transplantation, whereas progress in liver transplantation (LT) has been comparatively slower. The transition to a fully minimally invasive approach for LT has required a gradual, stepwise development, significantly accelerated by the introduction of robotic technology. We herein report the largest series of whole graft robotic liver transplantation and provide preliminary observations.

Methods: This study is a retrospective, single-arm, single-center analysis of patients who underwent fully robotic total hepatectomy followed by robotic liver transplantation (RLT) between January and December 2024. The primary aim was to assess short-term outcomes, including the incidence of complications, early allograft failure (EAF) using the EASE score, primary non-function (PNF), and both graft and patient survival.

Results: Ten patients underwent RLT in the study period. Median age of the recipients in the study group was 63 (56-71), with a median BMI of 26 Kg/m2 (range 21-32) and 80% of ASA score of 2. Median MELD was 8.5 (6-25), 80% of the cases were in Child class A , 40% had a clinically significant portal hypertension. No cases of high-grade morbidity (Clavien >3a) occurred at 30 days, nor readmissions. After a median follow-up of 10.6 months all patients are alive and in good general conditions, graft survival is 100% and liver function is optimal in all cases.

Conclusions: The robotic approach to liver transplantation has demonstrated feasibility and promising short-term outcomes. However, extended follow-up is required to confirm these results over the long term with the aim to confirm outcomes comparable to benchmark results of open transplantation.

机器人肝移植:摩德纳大学经验。
实体器官移植的微创技术在肾移植中已经建立,而在肝移植(LT)方面的进展相对较慢。向完全微创入路的过渡需要一个循序渐进的发展过程,机器人技术的引入大大加速了这一过程。我们在此报道最大的全移植物机器人肝移植系列,并提供初步观察。方法:本研究是一项回顾性、单臂、单中心分析,研究对象是2024年1月至12月期间接受全机器人全肝切除术后机器人肝移植(RLT)的患者。主要目的是评估短期结果,包括并发症的发生率、使用EASE评分的早期同种异体移植失败(EAF)、原发性无功能(PNF)以及移植物和患者的生存。结果:10例患者在研究期间接受了RLT。研究组受试者的中位年龄为63岁(56-71岁),中位BMI为26 Kg/m2(范围21-32),ASA评分为2分的80%。中位MELD为8.5(6-25),80%为Child A级,40%有临床意义的门静脉高压症。30天内没有发生高级别发病率(Clavien >3a),也没有再入院。中位随访10.6个月后,所有患者均存活,总体情况良好,移植物存活率为100%,所有病例肝功能均最佳。结论:机器人肝移植方法具有可行性和良好的短期效果。然而,需要长期的随访来证实这些结果,目的是确认与开放移植的基准结果相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信