Paolo Magistri, Roberta Odorizzi, Barbara Catellani, Cristiano Guidetti, Giuseppe Esposito, Giacomo Assirati, Tiziana Olivieri, Gian Piero Guerrini, Stefano Di Sandro, Fabrizio Di Benedetto
{"title":"Robotic liver transplantation: University of modena experience.","authors":"Paolo Magistri, Roberta Odorizzi, Barbara Catellani, Cristiano Guidetti, Giuseppe Esposito, Giacomo Assirati, Tiziana Olivieri, Gian Piero Guerrini, Stefano Di Sandro, Fabrizio Di Benedetto","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques for solid organ transplantation are well established in kidney transplantation, whereas progress in liver transplantation (LT) has been comparatively slower. The transition to a fully minimally invasive approach for LT has required a gradual, stepwise development, significantly accelerated by the introduction of robotic technology. We herein report the largest series of whole graft robotic liver transplantation and provide preliminary observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective, single-arm, single-center analysis of patients who underwent fully robotic total hepatectomy followed by robotic liver transplantation (RLT) between January and December 2024. The primary aim was to assess short-term outcomes, including the incidence of complications, early allograft failure (EAF) using the EASE score, primary non-function (PNF), and both graft and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients underwent RLT in the study period. Median age of the recipients in the study group was 63 (56-71), with a median BMI of 26 Kg/m2 (range 21-32) and 80% of ASA score of 2. Median MELD was 8.5 (6-25), 80% of the cases were in Child class A , 40% had a clinically significant portal hypertension. No cases of high-grade morbidity (Clavien >3a) occurred at 30 days, nor readmissions. After a median follow-up of 10.6 months all patients are alive and in good general conditions, graft survival is 100% and liver function is optimal in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The robotic approach to liver transplantation has demonstrated feasibility and promising short-term outcomes. However, extended follow-up is required to confirm these results over the long term with the aim to confirm outcomes comparable to benchmark results of open transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520704,"journal":{"name":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques for solid organ transplantation are well established in kidney transplantation, whereas progress in liver transplantation (LT) has been comparatively slower. The transition to a fully minimally invasive approach for LT has required a gradual, stepwise development, significantly accelerated by the introduction of robotic technology. We herein report the largest series of whole graft robotic liver transplantation and provide preliminary observations.
Methods: This study is a retrospective, single-arm, single-center analysis of patients who underwent fully robotic total hepatectomy followed by robotic liver transplantation (RLT) between January and December 2024. The primary aim was to assess short-term outcomes, including the incidence of complications, early allograft failure (EAF) using the EASE score, primary non-function (PNF), and both graft and patient survival.
Results: Ten patients underwent RLT in the study period. Median age of the recipients in the study group was 63 (56-71), with a median BMI of 26 Kg/m2 (range 21-32) and 80% of ASA score of 2. Median MELD was 8.5 (6-25), 80% of the cases were in Child class A , 40% had a clinically significant portal hypertension. No cases of high-grade morbidity (Clavien >3a) occurred at 30 days, nor readmissions. After a median follow-up of 10.6 months all patients are alive and in good general conditions, graft survival is 100% and liver function is optimal in all cases.
Conclusions: The robotic approach to liver transplantation has demonstrated feasibility and promising short-term outcomes. However, extended follow-up is required to confirm these results over the long term with the aim to confirm outcomes comparable to benchmark results of open transplantation.