Influence of the Presence of Other People on Performing Rescue Actions in Emergency Situations - A Questionnaire Survey.

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0166
Haruka Shida, Chika Nishiyama, Satoe Okabayashi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Tomonari Shimamoto, Takashi Kawamura, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Taku Iwami
{"title":"Influence of the Presence of Other People on Performing Rescue Actions in Emergency Situations - A Questionnaire Survey.","authors":"Haruka Shida, Chika Nishiyama, Satoe Okabayashi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Tomonari Shimamoto, Takashi Kawamura, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Taku Iwami","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because bystander performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases is influenced by the number of rescuers/bystanders, we assessed the relationship between the presence of other people and performance of rescue actions in an actual emergency situation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed using data from an anonymous self-administered questionnaire-based survey that included laypersons who had encountered emergency situations during the past 5 years. Based on their responses related to the presence of other people, laypersons were divided into 2 groups: \"single-bystander\" (absence of others) and \"multiple-bystanders\" (presence of others). The primary outcome was any rescue action(s) performed by laypersons during an emergency. A total of 1,219 laypersons were eligible for our analysis; 69 (5.7%) encountered emergencies in which others were absent (single-bystander group) and 1,150 (94.3%) encountered emergencies in which others were present (multiple-bystanders group). The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was 95.7% in the single-bystander group and 73.8% in the multiple-bystanders group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was lower when other people were present compared with when they were absent.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 6","pages":"419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because bystander performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases is influenced by the number of rescuers/bystanders, we assessed the relationship between the presence of other people and performance of rescue actions in an actual emergency situation.

Methods and results: A cross-sectional study was performed using data from an anonymous self-administered questionnaire-based survey that included laypersons who had encountered emergency situations during the past 5 years. Based on their responses related to the presence of other people, laypersons were divided into 2 groups: "single-bystander" (absence of others) and "multiple-bystanders" (presence of others). The primary outcome was any rescue action(s) performed by laypersons during an emergency. A total of 1,219 laypersons were eligible for our analysis; 69 (5.7%) encountered emergencies in which others were absent (single-bystander group) and 1,150 (94.3%) encountered emergencies in which others were present (multiple-bystanders group). The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was 95.7% in the single-bystander group and 73.8% in the multiple-bystanders group.

Conclusions: The proportion of laypersons who performed any rescue actions was lower when other people were present compared with when they were absent.

他人在场对紧急情况下救援行动的影响-问卷调查。
背景:由于院外心脏骤停病例中旁观者心肺复苏的表现受到救援人员/旁观者数量的影响,我们评估了在实际紧急情况下其他人的存在与救援行动表现之间的关系。方法和结果:采用一项匿名自我管理问卷调查的数据进行横断面研究,调查对象包括在过去5年中遇到紧急情况的非专业人员。根据外行人对他人在场的反应,将其分为两组:“单一旁观者”(他人缺席)和“多重旁观者”(他人在场)。主要结果是在紧急情况下由非专业人员执行的任何救援行动。共有1,219名非专业人士符合我们的分析条件;69人(5.7%)遇到其他人不在场的紧急情况(单旁观者组),1150人(94.3%)遇到其他人在场的紧急情况(多旁观者组)。外行人采取任何救援行动的比例在单旁观者组为95.7%,在多旁观者组为73.8%。结论:当他人在场时,外行人采取任何救援行动的比例低于他人不在时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信