Self-Etching Primer Or Hydrofluoric Acid: Effects On the Bond Strength Stability of a Leucite-Based Glass-Ceramic.

Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro, Rita Adriana Souza da Silva de Assi, Mateus Gaya Dos Santos, Marco Antonio Bottino, Renata Marques de Melo
{"title":"Self-Etching Primer Or Hydrofluoric Acid: Effects On the Bond Strength Stability of a Leucite-Based Glass-Ceramic.","authors":"Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro, Rita Adriana Souza da Silva de Assi, Mateus Gaya Dos Santos, Marco Antonio Bottino, Renata Marques de Melo","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_2092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of a self-etching primer on the long-term bond strength stability between a leucite-based glass-ceramic and resin cement, compared to the conventional treatment involving hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching followed by silane application.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blocks of a leucite-based glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD) were cut into plates and embedded in acrylic resin. Half of the specimens were treated with 5% HF for 60 s and silane application, and the other half was treated with a self-etching primer (Monobond Etch and Prime, MEP). Resin cement cylinders (n = 24) were built onto their surfaces, and the specimens of each group were divided into three subgroups according to the microshear bond strength (µSBS) testing time: baseline, after 10,000 thermocycles, or after 10,000 thermocycles followed by 180 days of immersion in water. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests. Complementary failure mode, contact angle, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEP groups showed higher bond strength results than HF. HF-treated specimens exhibited a decrease in bond strength after thermocycling and water storage, while MEP-treated specimens maintained similar bond strength values across all aging conditions. Only cohesive failures within the ceramic were observed at baseline. After aging, most HF specimens exhibited adhesive failures. HF etching created more irregularities with apparent deeper defects on the ceramic surface compared to MEP. HF etching produced a lower contact angle between the ceramic surface and the water drop compared to the self-etching primer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying the self-etching primer resulted in higher bond strength stability between leucite-based glass-ceramic and resin cement compared to conventional treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_2092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a self-etching primer on the long-term bond strength stability between a leucite-based glass-ceramic and resin cement, compared to the conventional treatment involving hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching followed by silane application.

Materials and methods: Blocks of a leucite-based glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD) were cut into plates and embedded in acrylic resin. Half of the specimens were treated with 5% HF for 60 s and silane application, and the other half was treated with a self-etching primer (Monobond Etch and Prime, MEP). Resin cement cylinders (n = 24) were built onto their surfaces, and the specimens of each group were divided into three subgroups according to the microshear bond strength (µSBS) testing time: baseline, after 10,000 thermocycles, or after 10,000 thermocycles followed by 180 days of immersion in water. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests. Complementary failure mode, contact angle, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were carried out.

Results: MEP groups showed higher bond strength results than HF. HF-treated specimens exhibited a decrease in bond strength after thermocycling and water storage, while MEP-treated specimens maintained similar bond strength values across all aging conditions. Only cohesive failures within the ceramic were observed at baseline. After aging, most HF specimens exhibited adhesive failures. HF etching created more irregularities with apparent deeper defects on the ceramic surface compared to MEP. HF etching produced a lower contact angle between the ceramic surface and the water drop compared to the self-etching primer.

Conclusion: Applying the self-etching primer resulted in higher bond strength stability between leucite-based glass-ceramic and resin cement compared to conventional treatment.

自蚀刻底漆或氢氟酸对白晶石基玻璃陶瓷粘结强度稳定性的影响。
目的:评价自蚀刻底漆与氢氟酸(HF)蚀刻后再涂硅烷的常规处理相比,对白石基玻璃陶瓷与树脂水泥之间长期粘结强度稳定性的影响。材料和方法:将白石基玻璃陶瓷(IPS Empress CAD)块切割成板,并嵌入丙烯酸树脂中。一半的样品用5% HF处理60 s并应用硅烷,另一半用自蚀刻底漆(Monobond Etch and Prime, MEP)处理。将树脂水泥柱(n = 24)置于其表面,每组试样根据微剪切粘结强度(µSBS)测试时间分为三个亚组:基线、10,000热循环后、10,000热循环后180天的水中浸泡。统计学分析采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验。进行了互补失效模式、接触角和扫描电镜分析。结果:MEP组黏结强度高于HF组。hf处理后的试样在热循环和水储存后的粘结强度下降,而mep处理后的试样在所有老化条件下均保持相似的粘结强度值。在基线时只观察到陶瓷内部的内聚破坏。老化后,大多数HF试样出现粘接失效。与MEP相比,HF蚀刻在陶瓷表面产生了更多的不规则性和明显更深的缺陷。与自蚀刻底漆相比,HF蚀刻产生的陶瓷表面与水滴之间的接触角更小。结论:与常规处理相比,使用自蚀刻底漆可以提高白石基玻璃陶瓷与树脂水泥的结合强度稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信