The role of antibiotic prophylaxis for healthy patients in tooth extraction and implantation procedures: A systematic review.

Stomatologija Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Pranas Grinkevičius, David Kasradze, Aleksandr Kasradze, Albinas Gervickas, Juozas Žilinskas
{"title":"The role of antibiotic prophylaxis for healthy patients in tooth extraction and implantation procedures: A systematic review.","authors":"Pranas Grinkevičius, David Kasradze, Aleksandr Kasradze, Albinas Gervickas, Juozas Žilinskas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Prophylactic antibiotics are frequently prescribed following outpatient oral surgical procedures to minimize the risk of surgical site infections. However, the overuse of antibiotics contributes to microbial resistance and increases the likelihood of adverse side effects. This highlights the need for a rational approach in assessing the necessity and appropriate dosing of antibiotics after outpatient oral surgeries. The primary aim of this study was to systematically analyze the literature on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in outpatient oral surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Scientific articles were selected following PRISMA guidelines. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between 2013 and 2023. Data searches were conducted on PubMed, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 RCTs involving 3,032 participants were included in this review. Of these, six studies reported no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of post-operative outcomes. In contrast, six studies focusing on tooth extraction reported significant differences in pain, swelling, trismus, and bleeding between the groups. Additionally, three studies on dental implant procedures revealed significant differences concerning implant failure rates, flap closure, and pain levels. Despite these findings, the overall evidence did not demonstrate statistically significant benefits of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post-operative infectious complications. Furthermore, no evidence was found to support the importance of timing in the administration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this systematic review do not support the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics for healthy patients to prevent post-operative infections in outpatient oral surgical procedures. Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines on the necessity and optimal timing of antibiotic use in such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94215,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"26 3","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Prophylactic antibiotics are frequently prescribed following outpatient oral surgical procedures to minimize the risk of surgical site infections. However, the overuse of antibiotics contributes to microbial resistance and increases the likelihood of adverse side effects. This highlights the need for a rational approach in assessing the necessity and appropriate dosing of antibiotics after outpatient oral surgeries. The primary aim of this study was to systematically analyze the literature on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in outpatient oral surgery.

Materials and methods: Scientific articles were selected following PRISMA guidelines. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between 2013 and 2023. Data searches were conducted on PubMed, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library databases.

Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 3,032 participants were included in this review. Of these, six studies reported no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of post-operative outcomes. In contrast, six studies focusing on tooth extraction reported significant differences in pain, swelling, trismus, and bleeding between the groups. Additionally, three studies on dental implant procedures revealed significant differences concerning implant failure rates, flap closure, and pain levels. Despite these findings, the overall evidence did not demonstrate statistically significant benefits of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post-operative infectious complications. Furthermore, no evidence was found to support the importance of timing in the administration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy.

Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review do not support the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics for healthy patients to prevent post-operative infections in outpatient oral surgical procedures. Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines on the necessity and optimal timing of antibiotic use in such cases.

健康患者在拔牙和种植过程中抗生素预防的作用:系统综述。
背景和目的:预防性抗生素经常在门诊口腔外科手术后处方,以尽量减少手术部位感染的风险。然而,过度使用抗生素会导致微生物产生耐药性,并增加不良副作用的可能性。这突出了在评估门诊口腔手术后抗生素的必要性和适当剂量时需要一个合理的方法。本研究的主要目的是系统分析门诊口腔手术中预防性抗生素使用的文献。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南选择科学文章。该综述纳入了2013年至2023年间以英文发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。数据检索在PubMed、ClinicalKey和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行。结果:本综述共纳入15项随机对照试验,涉及3032名受试者。其中,6项研究报告在术后结果方面组间无统计学显著差异。相比之下,六项关于拔牙的研究报告了两组患者在疼痛、肿胀、牙关紧闭和出血方面的显著差异。此外,三项关于牙科种植手术的研究显示,在种植失败率、皮瓣关闭和疼痛水平方面存在显著差异。尽管有这些发现,总体证据并没有显示预防性抗生素在减少术后感染并发症方面的统计学显著益处。此外,没有发现证据支持在预防性抗生素治疗中给予时机的重要性。结论:本系统综述的结果不支持健康患者在门诊口腔外科手术中常规使用预防性抗生素来预防术后感染。需要进一步的研究来确定在这种情况下使用抗生素的必要性和最佳时机的明确指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信