Secondary thigh telangiectasias after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.

D Borsuk, V Kozlova, A Fokin, R Tauraginskii, M Galchenko, K Lobastov
{"title":"Secondary thigh telangiectasias after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.","authors":"D Borsuk, V Kozlova, A Fokin, R Tauraginskii, M Galchenko, K Lobastov","doi":"10.1177/02683555251351368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo assess the incidence of secondary telangiectasias (TAEs) after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and discuss the possible risk factors for its development.MethodThis prospective observational study enrolled 123 lower limbs of 103 patients with varicose veins of C2 or C4 clinical classes who underwent EVLA of the GSV trunk from the saphenofemoral junction to the below knee level without simultaneous removal of varicose tributaries and/or perforating veins. The primary outcome was the occurrence and amount of secondary TAEs (matting) that developed at the medial aspect of the thigh along the treated GSV within a 3-month follow-up. The assessment was made by analysis of before and after photos by three experienced surgeons using a four-point scale. Fleiss' Kappa was used to measure the agreement between the assessors.ResultsSecondary TAE development was reported in 26 limbs (21.1%; 95% CI, 15.0-29.0%). Almost perfect agreement was observed between assessors for any matting (κ = 0.92; <i>p</i> < .0001) and different amounts of it (κ = 0.93, κ = 0.90, κ = 0.85, and κ = 1.00 for the score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The most prevalent was a low amount of new TAEs (score of 1 in 17.9%). The only significant difference between the patients with and without secondary TAEs was age: 52.5 (IQR, 43-61) versus 40 (IQR, 34-53) years old.ConclusionsIn most cases (96,8%), secondary TAEs are either absent or could be found in a low amount. Older patients are more predisposed to its development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251351368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251351368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the incidence of secondary telangiectasias (TAEs) after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and discuss the possible risk factors for its development.MethodThis prospective observational study enrolled 123 lower limbs of 103 patients with varicose veins of C2 or C4 clinical classes who underwent EVLA of the GSV trunk from the saphenofemoral junction to the below knee level without simultaneous removal of varicose tributaries and/or perforating veins. The primary outcome was the occurrence and amount of secondary TAEs (matting) that developed at the medial aspect of the thigh along the treated GSV within a 3-month follow-up. The assessment was made by analysis of before and after photos by three experienced surgeons using a four-point scale. Fleiss' Kappa was used to measure the agreement between the assessors.ResultsSecondary TAE development was reported in 26 limbs (21.1%; 95% CI, 15.0-29.0%). Almost perfect agreement was observed between assessors for any matting (κ = 0.92; p < .0001) and different amounts of it (κ = 0.93, κ = 0.90, κ = 0.85, and κ = 1.00 for the score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The most prevalent was a low amount of new TAEs (score of 1 in 17.9%). The only significant difference between the patients with and without secondary TAEs was age: 52.5 (IQR, 43-61) versus 40 (IQR, 34-53) years old.ConclusionsIn most cases (96,8%), secondary TAEs are either absent or could be found in a low amount. Older patients are more predisposed to its development.

大隐静脉激光消融后继发大腿毛细血管扩张。
目的探讨大隐静脉内激光消融(EVLA)后继发毛细血管扩张(TAEs)的发生率,并探讨其发展的可能危险因素。方法本前瞻性观察研究纳入103例临床级别为C2或C4的静脉曲张患者的123个下肢,这些患者接受了从隐股连接处到膝下水平的GSV干EVLA,同时不切除静脉曲张和/或穿静脉。主要结果是在3个月的随访中,沿治疗过的GSV在大腿内侧发生的继发性TAEs (matting)的发生率和数量。评估是由三位经验丰富的外科医生使用四分制对前后照片进行分析得出的。采用Fleiss Kappa法来衡量评估者之间的一致性。结果继发TAE 26例(21.1%);95% ci, 15.0-29.0%)。评估者之间对任何消光几乎完全一致(κ = 0.92;P < 0.0001)和不同数量的κ (κ = 0.93, κ = 0.90, κ = 0.85, κ = 1.00,分别为0、1、2和3分)。最常见的是新发TAEs数量少(17.9%的患者中得分为1)。继发性TAEs患者与非继发性TAEs患者之间的唯一显著差异是年龄:52.5岁(IQR, 43-61)与40岁(IQR, 34-53)。结论绝大多数病例(96.8%)均无继发性胸腺瘤或可发现少量胸腺瘤。老年患者更容易患此病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信