Pathways for pragmatic decolonisation in research.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.19943.1
Monique Kwachou
{"title":"Pathways for pragmatic decolonisation in research.","authors":"Monique Kwachou","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.19943.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For too long, research on African peoples, histories, and ideas has been shaped by institutions and frameworks rooted in former colonial metropoles. This has sustained epistemic hierarchies that privilege Western paradigms while marginalising African knowledge systems. While there is increasing consensus on the need to decolonise research, less attention has been paid to how this can be achieved in practical terms. This paper argues that decentralisation-a concept familiar in governance-offers a useful metaphor and framework for rethinking how power over knowledge production can be redistributed to African scholars, institutions, and communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With this paper, the author adopts a conceptual-empirical approach grounded in personal research experiences within Cameroonian higher education and supported by a review of scholarly efforts by African researchers engaging with decolonial paradigms. Reflexive narrative inquiry is used to interrogate how decision-making, methodological choices, and epistemic validation processes unfold in research spaces. The paper reinterprets decentralisation to develop a framework for epistemic redistribution in knowledge production.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Building on the idea that decolonisation entails decentralising epistemic power, the paper identifies one foundational starting point and three interconnected pathways for action. Theoretical pathways reclaim African epistemologies as valid and generative, disrupting Eurocentric dominance. Methodological pathways advance participatory, Afrocentric approaches grounded in lived experience and relational ethics. Administrative pathways call for institutional reforms that empower African scholars and communities in shaping research agendas, resource flows, and dissemination. Collectively, these pathways outline intentional shifts in authority over theory, method, and governance that operationalise decolonisation in knowledge production.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By re-framing decolonisation as decentralisation, this paper provides an accessible and actionable model for transforming knowledge production in African contexts. It contributes to bridging the theory-practice gap in decolonial discourse, offering concrete strategies to recentre African thought, amplify historically marginalised voices, and cultivate epistemic justice within and beyond the academy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19943.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For too long, research on African peoples, histories, and ideas has been shaped by institutions and frameworks rooted in former colonial metropoles. This has sustained epistemic hierarchies that privilege Western paradigms while marginalising African knowledge systems. While there is increasing consensus on the need to decolonise research, less attention has been paid to how this can be achieved in practical terms. This paper argues that decentralisation-a concept familiar in governance-offers a useful metaphor and framework for rethinking how power over knowledge production can be redistributed to African scholars, institutions, and communities.

Methods: With this paper, the author adopts a conceptual-empirical approach grounded in personal research experiences within Cameroonian higher education and supported by a review of scholarly efforts by African researchers engaging with decolonial paradigms. Reflexive narrative inquiry is used to interrogate how decision-making, methodological choices, and epistemic validation processes unfold in research spaces. The paper reinterprets decentralisation to develop a framework for epistemic redistribution in knowledge production.

Results: Building on the idea that decolonisation entails decentralising epistemic power, the paper identifies one foundational starting point and three interconnected pathways for action. Theoretical pathways reclaim African epistemologies as valid and generative, disrupting Eurocentric dominance. Methodological pathways advance participatory, Afrocentric approaches grounded in lived experience and relational ethics. Administrative pathways call for institutional reforms that empower African scholars and communities in shaping research agendas, resource flows, and dissemination. Collectively, these pathways outline intentional shifts in authority over theory, method, and governance that operationalise decolonisation in knowledge production.

Conclusions: By re-framing decolonisation as decentralisation, this paper provides an accessible and actionable model for transforming knowledge production in African contexts. It contributes to bridging the theory-practice gap in decolonial discourse, offering concrete strategies to recentre African thought, amplify historically marginalised voices, and cultivate epistemic justice within and beyond the academy.

研究中务实非殖民化的途径。
背景:长期以来,对非洲人民、历史和思想的研究一直受到植根于前殖民大都市的机构和框架的影响。这导致了持续的知识等级制度,使西方范式享有特权,同时使非洲的知识体系边缘化。虽然对非殖民化研究的必要性有越来越多的协商一致意见,但对如何在实际中实现这一目标的注意较少。本文认为,权力下放——治理中常见的一个概念——为重新思考如何将知识生产的权力重新分配给非洲学者、机构和社区提供了一个有用的隐喻和框架。方法:在本文中,作者采用了一种基于喀麦隆高等教育个人研究经验的概念-实证方法,并通过对非洲研究人员从事非殖民化范式的学术努力的回顾来支持。反身性叙事调查用于询问决策,方法选择和认知验证过程如何在研究空间中展开。本文重新解释了权力下放,以建立知识生产中知识再分配的框架。结果:基于非殖民化需要分散知识权力的想法,本文确定了一个基本起点和三个相互关联的行动途径。理论路径主张非洲认识论是有效的和生成的,破坏了欧洲中心的统治地位。方法途径推进参与性,以非洲为中心的方法,以生活经验和关系伦理为基础。行政途径要求制度改革,赋予非洲学者和社区在制定研究议程、资源流动和传播方面的权力。总的来说,这些途径概述了在理论、方法和治理方面的权威有意转变,从而在知识生产中实现非殖民化。结论:通过将非殖民化重新定义为权力下放,本文为非洲背景下的知识生产转型提供了一个可访问和可操作的模型。它有助于弥合非殖民话语中的理论与实践差距,为重新定位非洲思想提供具体策略,放大历史上被边缘化的声音,并在学术界内外培养认识正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信