Developing an ML-Based Pretest Probability Model of Obstructive CAD in Patients With Stable Chest Pain

Guanhua Dou MMS , Jia Zhou MD , Ziqiang Guo MBBS , Dongkai Shan MD , Xi Wang MD , Tao Li MD , Xinghua Zhang MD , Lei Xu MD , Mei Zhang MD , Xudong Lv MD , Junjie Yang MD , Yundai Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Developing an ML-Based Pretest Probability Model of Obstructive CAD in Patients With Stable Chest Pain","authors":"Guanhua Dou MMS ,&nbsp;Jia Zhou MD ,&nbsp;Ziqiang Guo MBBS ,&nbsp;Dongkai Shan MD ,&nbsp;Xi Wang MD ,&nbsp;Tao Li MD ,&nbsp;Xinghua Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Lei Xu MD ,&nbsp;Mei Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Xudong Lv MD ,&nbsp;Junjie Yang MD ,&nbsp;Yundai Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Updated pretest probability models (ESC2019, the PTP model supported by the European Society of Cardiology after a pooled analysis; and RF-CL, the risk factor-weighted model) are recommended for initial evaluation of patients with stable chest pain before coronary computed tomography angiography to reduce unnecessary examination by recent guidelines. However, the reliability of those pretest probability models has not been fully investigated, especially in Chinese population.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to build a machine learning-based pretest probability model in patients with stable chest pain and compare it with ESC2019 and RF-CL model in a Chinese population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is an analysis of the Chinese registry in China, with a large scale, foresight, and a multicenter cohort. Obstructive coronary artery disease refers to at least 1 lesion ≥70% diameter stenosis in main branches or ≥50% left main stenosis by coronary computed tomography angiography. A pretest probability model, the C-STRAT (Chinese Registry in Early Detection and Risk Stratification of Coronary Plaques) score, was conducted by an ensemble machine learning algorithm in training data set and compared with other pretest probability models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the testing data set, the C-STRAT score gave the best performance in discrimination evaluation (AUC: 0.769; 95% CI: 0.753-0.784). It also performed well in calibration evaluation. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement of the C-STRAT score were positive compared with other pretest probability models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A high-performance pretest probability model derived from machine learning algorithm was developed based on a multicenter Chinese population and expected to facilitate the decision making for downstream tests. (Chinese Database of National Coronary Plaques Registry; <span><span>ChiCTR1800015864</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":"5 7","pages":"Pages 865-880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374725002625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Updated pretest probability models (ESC2019, the PTP model supported by the European Society of Cardiology after a pooled analysis; and RF-CL, the risk factor-weighted model) are recommended for initial evaluation of patients with stable chest pain before coronary computed tomography angiography to reduce unnecessary examination by recent guidelines. However, the reliability of those pretest probability models has not been fully investigated, especially in Chinese population.

Objectives

This study aims to build a machine learning-based pretest probability model in patients with stable chest pain and compare it with ESC2019 and RF-CL model in a Chinese population.

Methods

This is an analysis of the Chinese registry in China, with a large scale, foresight, and a multicenter cohort. Obstructive coronary artery disease refers to at least 1 lesion ≥70% diameter stenosis in main branches or ≥50% left main stenosis by coronary computed tomography angiography. A pretest probability model, the C-STRAT (Chinese Registry in Early Detection and Risk Stratification of Coronary Plaques) score, was conducted by an ensemble machine learning algorithm in training data set and compared with other pretest probability models.

Results

In the testing data set, the C-STRAT score gave the best performance in discrimination evaluation (AUC: 0.769; 95% CI: 0.753-0.784). It also performed well in calibration evaluation. The integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement of the C-STRAT score were positive compared with other pretest probability models.

Conclusions

A high-performance pretest probability model derived from machine learning algorithm was developed based on a multicenter Chinese population and expected to facilitate the decision making for downstream tests. (Chinese Database of National Coronary Plaques Registry; ChiCTR1800015864)
基于ml的阻塞性CAD稳定胸痛患者预测概率模型的建立。
背景:更新前测概率模型(ESC2019,欧洲心脏病学会在汇总分析后支持的PTP模型);和RF-CL(危险因素加权模型)被推荐用于冠状动脉ct血管造影前对稳定胸痛患者的初步评估,以减少近期指南中不必要的检查。然而,这些预试概率模型的可靠性还没有得到充分的研究,特别是在中国人群中。目的:本研究旨在建立基于机器学习的稳定性胸痛患者预测概率模型,并与ESC2019和RF-CL模型在中国人群中的比较。方法:这是一项大规模、前瞻性、多中心队列的中国登记分析。冠状动脉梗阻性病变是指冠状动脉计算机断层造影显示至少1个病变主支狭窄≥70%或左主干狭窄≥50%。采用集成机器学习算法在训练数据集中建立预测概率模型C-STRAT (Chinese Registry in Early Detection and Risk Stratification of Coronary plaque)评分,并与其他预测概率模型进行比较。结果:在测试数据集中,C-STRAT评分在鉴别评价中表现最佳(AUC: 0.769;95% ci: 0.753-0.784)。在标定评价中也表现良好。与其他预试概率模型相比,C-STRAT评分的综合判别改善和净重分类改善均为正。结论:基于多中心中国人群,开发了基于机器学习算法的高性能预测概率模型,有望促进下游测试的决策。中国国家冠状动脉斑块数据库;ChiCTR1800015864)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信