Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques on the Dragon Spacecraft: A Polaris Dawn Mission Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anna Menon, David Mampre, Jared Isaacman, Scott Poteet, Sarah Gillis, Jaime Mateus, Marissa Rosenberg
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques on the Dragon Spacecraft: A Polaris Dawn Mission Study.","authors":"Anna Menon, David Mampre, Jared Isaacman, Scott Poteet, Sarah Gillis, Jaime Mateus, Marissa Rosenberg","doi":"10.1177/10806032251346746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction-Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in microgravity is challenging due to reciprocal motion between the patient and operator, requiring unique methods of stabilization for chest compressions. In this study, the Polaris Dawn mission crew evaluated optimal methods of CPR administration in the Dragon spacecraft during spaceflight as well as the impact of CPR tasks to the vehicle.Methods-CPR was simulated by compressing a CPR Adult Manikin Bellows Piston with Clicker against different surfaces of the vehicle. Crew members performed compressions at 3 different locations to select the optimal worksite. All 4 crew members then performed a 2-min round of compressions at the optimal worksite. Workload was measured using the Bedford workload and Borg rating of perceived exertion scales, where lower scores are desirable for both scales. Vehicle impacts were monitored with navigation and carbon dioxide sensors.Results-The outboard seat was selected as the optimal worksite. When performing a full 2 min of chest compressions at this location, average Bedford workload and Borg rating of perceived exertion scores among all 4 crew members were 4.75 and 16, respectively. All 4 crew members achieved the target-frequency range (mean, 1.8 Hz; range 1.7-1.9 Hz). Vehicle accelerations were observed in all axes, and cabin carbon dioxide increased to a peak level of >3.6 mm Hg, triggering a carbon dioxide caution limit.Conclusions-Outboard seat location provided the best ergonomics for administration of CPR on the Dragon spacecraft, although task performance had high difficulty ratings. CPR also was associated with elevated cabin carbon dioxide and vehicle accelerations, as measured by the navigation system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251346746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251346746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction-Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in microgravity is challenging due to reciprocal motion between the patient and operator, requiring unique methods of stabilization for chest compressions. In this study, the Polaris Dawn mission crew evaluated optimal methods of CPR administration in the Dragon spacecraft during spaceflight as well as the impact of CPR tasks to the vehicle.Methods-CPR was simulated by compressing a CPR Adult Manikin Bellows Piston with Clicker against different surfaces of the vehicle. Crew members performed compressions at 3 different locations to select the optimal worksite. All 4 crew members then performed a 2-min round of compressions at the optimal worksite. Workload was measured using the Bedford workload and Borg rating of perceived exertion scales, where lower scores are desirable for both scales. Vehicle impacts were monitored with navigation and carbon dioxide sensors.Results-The outboard seat was selected as the optimal worksite. When performing a full 2 min of chest compressions at this location, average Bedford workload and Borg rating of perceived exertion scores among all 4 crew members were 4.75 and 16, respectively. All 4 crew members achieved the target-frequency range (mean, 1.8 Hz; range 1.7-1.9 Hz). Vehicle accelerations were observed in all axes, and cabin carbon dioxide increased to a peak level of >3.6 mm Hg, triggering a carbon dioxide caution limit.Conclusions-Outboard seat location provided the best ergonomics for administration of CPR on the Dragon spacecraft, although task performance had high difficulty ratings. CPR also was associated with elevated cabin carbon dioxide and vehicle accelerations, as measured by the navigation system.

龙飞船上的心肺复苏技术:北极星黎明任务研究。
由于患者和操作者之间的相互运动,在微重力下进行心肺复苏(CPR)是具有挑战性的,需要独特的胸部按压稳定方法。在本研究中,北极星黎明任务机组人员评估了龙飞船在太空飞行期间CPR管理的最佳方法以及CPR任务对飞行器的影响。方法:将成人心肺复苏术人体波纹管活塞与车辆的不同表面进行压缩,模拟心肺复苏术。工作人员在三个不同的位置进行了压缩,以选择最佳的工作地点。然后,所有4名工作人员在最佳工作地点进行了2分钟的按压。工作量是用贝德福德工作量和博格的感知劳累量表来衡量的,这两个量表的得分越低越好。车辆撞击用导航和二氧化碳传感器监测。结果:选择舷外座位为最佳工作地点。当在该位置进行2分钟的胸外按压时,所有4名机组人员的平均贝德福德工作量和博格感知运动评分分别为4.75和16。所有4名机组成员均达到目标频率范围(平均1.8 Hz;范围1.7-1.9赫兹)。在所有轴上都观察到车辆加速,并且舱内二氧化碳增加到峰值水平b> 3.6 mm Hg,触发了二氧化碳警告限制。结论:尽管任务难度较高,但舷外座椅位置为龙飞船的心肺复苏管理提供了最佳的人体工程学效果。根据导航系统的测量,心肺复苏术还与舱内二氧化碳和车辆加速度升高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信