Comparison of Early Results of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Total Extraperitoneal Repair in Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Cihan Atar, Emir Çapkınoğlu, Burak Yavuz, Ahmet Onur Demirel, Cihan Uras
{"title":"Comparison of Early Results of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Total Extraperitoneal Repair in Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.","authors":"Cihan Atar, Emir Çapkınoğlu, Burak Yavuz, Ahmet Onur Demirel, Cihan Uras","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The optimal surgical approach for recurrent inguinal hernia remains controversial. Among the commonly used laparoscopic techniques, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs are frequently performed, yet data comparing their short-term outcomes in recurrent cases are limited. This study aimed to compare early clinical outcomes of TAPP versus TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia between January 2022 and April 2024 at two centers. Patients were assigned to TEP (<i>n</i> = 27) or TAPP (<i>n</i> = 21) groups based on surgeon preference. Demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes including recurrence, complications, visual analogue pain scores (visual analogue scale [VAS]), analgesic requirement, urinary retention, seroma formation, and testicular complications, were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Baseline characteristics were comparable except for age, which was significantly lower in the TAPP group (47.5 ± 14.1 versus 60.3 ± 10.2; <i>P</i> < .001). No significant differences were observed in operative time, VAS scores, or hospital stay. Although intraoperative bleeding, urinary retention, and seroma were more frequent in the TAPP group, these did not reach statistical significance. No conversions to open surgery occurred in the TEP group, while one was noted in the TAPP group. During a median follow-up of 22 months for TEP and 16 months for TAPP, a single recurrence was observed in the TAPP group (4.8%). Rates of chronic pain were similar between groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Both TAPP and TEP are safe and effective for recurrent inguinal hernia repair, with low complication and recurrence rates. No clear superiority was demonstrated. Surgical technique should be selected based on individual patient and anatomical factors. Further randomized prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal approach in recurrent cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical approach for recurrent inguinal hernia remains controversial. Among the commonly used laparoscopic techniques, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs are frequently performed, yet data comparing their short-term outcomes in recurrent cases are limited. This study aimed to compare early clinical outcomes of TAPP versus TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia between January 2022 and April 2024 at two centers. Patients were assigned to TEP (n = 27) or TAPP (n = 21) groups based on surgeon preference. Demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes including recurrence, complications, visual analogue pain scores (visual analogue scale [VAS]), analgesic requirement, urinary retention, seroma formation, and testicular complications, were assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable except for age, which was significantly lower in the TAPP group (47.5 ± 14.1 versus 60.3 ± 10.2; P < .001). No significant differences were observed in operative time, VAS scores, or hospital stay. Although intraoperative bleeding, urinary retention, and seroma were more frequent in the TAPP group, these did not reach statistical significance. No conversions to open surgery occurred in the TEP group, while one was noted in the TAPP group. During a median follow-up of 22 months for TEP and 16 months for TAPP, a single recurrence was observed in the TAPP group (4.8%). Rates of chronic pain were similar between groups. Conclusion: Both TAPP and TEP are safe and effective for recurrent inguinal hernia repair, with low complication and recurrence rates. No clear superiority was demonstrated. Surgical technique should be selected based on individual patient and anatomical factors. Further randomized prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal approach in recurrent cases.

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与全腹膜外修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的早期效果比较。
背景:腹股沟疝复发的最佳手术入路仍有争议。在常用的腹腔镜技术中,经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和全腹膜外(TEP)修复是经常进行的,但比较它们在复发病例中的短期结果的数据有限。本研究旨在比较TAPP与TEP在复发性腹股沟疝修补中的早期临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年4月在两个中心接受腹腔镜手术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的48例患者。根据外科医生的喜好,将患者分为TEP组(n = 27)或TAPP组(n = 21)。评估人口统计学、术中变量和术后结果,包括复发、并发症、视觉模拟疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、镇痛需求、尿潴留、血清肿形成和睾丸并发症。结果:除年龄外,基线特征具有可比性,TAPP组的年龄显著低于TAPP组(47.5±14.1比60.3±10.2;P < 0.001)。在手术时间、VAS评分或住院时间方面没有观察到显著差异。TAPP组术中出血、尿潴留、血肿发生率较高,但无统计学意义。TEP组未发生转开手术,而TAPP组有一例。在中位随访期间,TEP为22个月,TAPP为16个月,TAPP组仅出现一次复发(4.8%)。两组间慢性疼痛的发生率相似。结论:TAPP和TEP用于腹股沟疝修补术安全有效,并发症少,复发率低。没有明显的优势被证明。手术技术的选择应根据个体患者和解剖因素。需要进一步的随机前瞻性研究来更好地确定复发病例的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信