An Irish soldier perceives the stars: Philip O'Sullivan Beare's exegetic cosmology, c. 1626-30.

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Kevin Gerard Tracey
{"title":"An Irish soldier perceives the stars: Philip O'Sullivan Beare's exegetic cosmology, c. 1626-30.","authors":"Kevin Gerard Tracey","doi":"10.1017/S0269889725100501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 1621 and 1626, the soldier-historian Philip O'Sullivan Beare authored treatises to motivate Catholic powers toward greater intervention in Ireland, and to defend his country's honor more generally. Moving beyond political theology, the author's unfinished manuscript <i>Zoilomastix</i> incorporated natural history and astronomy. The current article draws attention to a previously overlooked fragment wherein the Irishman considered contemporary debates on the structure of the heavens. It first considers the material history of the fragment, before exploring the influence of continental pedagogic and military networks upon the author. The paper then presents evidence of O'Sullivan Beare's adherence to Thomist, Bellarminian cosmology, and of his disagreement with Clavius and Galileo, via Jacques du Chevreul's 1623 commentary on Sacrobosco's <i>Sphere</i>. Contrasting the fragment's contents with the cosmogony published in the author's <i>Patritiana decas</i> (1629), it demonstrates that these exegetic readings were part of the author's wider strategy for \"making truth\" amidst shifting political, confessional, and cosmological paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 1621 and 1626, the soldier-historian Philip O'Sullivan Beare authored treatises to motivate Catholic powers toward greater intervention in Ireland, and to defend his country's honor more generally. Moving beyond political theology, the author's unfinished manuscript Zoilomastix incorporated natural history and astronomy. The current article draws attention to a previously overlooked fragment wherein the Irishman considered contemporary debates on the structure of the heavens. It first considers the material history of the fragment, before exploring the influence of continental pedagogic and military networks upon the author. The paper then presents evidence of O'Sullivan Beare's adherence to Thomist, Bellarminian cosmology, and of his disagreement with Clavius and Galileo, via Jacques du Chevreul's 1623 commentary on Sacrobosco's Sphere. Contrasting the fragment's contents with the cosmogony published in the author's Patritiana decas (1629), it demonstrates that these exegetic readings were part of the author's wider strategy for "making truth" amidst shifting political, confessional, and cosmological paradigms.

一名爱尔兰士兵感知星星:菲利普·奥沙利文·贝尔的激奋宇宙学,约1626- 1630年。
1621年至1626年间,士兵历史学家菲利普·奥沙利文·贝尔(Philip O'Sullivan Beare)撰写了一些论文,以激励天主教势力加大对爱尔兰的干预,并更广泛地捍卫自己国家的荣誉。除了政治神学之外,作者未完成的手稿《Zoilomastix》还包含了自然史和天文学。当前的文章引起了人们对先前被忽视的片段的关注,其中爱尔兰人考虑了当代关于天空结构的辩论。它首先考虑了碎片的物质历史,然后探索大陆教育和军事网络对作者的影响。然后,论文通过雅克·杜·舍夫勒1623年对萨克罗斯科球体的评论,展示了奥沙利文·贝尔坚持托马斯主义、贝拉米尼宇宙论的证据,以及他与克拉维乌斯和伽利略的分歧。将碎片的内容与作者在1629年出版的《爱国论》(patriana decas)中发表的宇宙论进行对比,可以看出这些训诂的解读是作者在不断变化的政治、忏悔和宇宙学范式中“制造真理”的更广泛策略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science in Context
Science in Context 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信