The effect of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination on endemic coronavirus-related mortality: A retrospective cohort study in Brazil.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1080/21645515.2025.2516314
Char Leung, Li Su, Aleksandra Zdanowicz, Lottie Collins, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva
{"title":"The effect of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination on endemic coronavirus-related mortality: A retrospective cohort study in Brazil.","authors":"Char Leung, Li Su, Aleksandra Zdanowicz, Lottie Collins, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2516314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endemic coronaviruses (eCoVs) cause the common cold in humans, particularly affecting children, the elderly, and individuals with comorbidities, who are prone to infection-related hospitalization. While vaccination remains the most effective preventative strategy against infections, vaccines against eCoVs are not available. This study investigates the association between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination and reduced eCoV-related mortality risk. Data from Brazil's nationwide hospital database included patients PCR-positive for one of four eCoV strains, with known admission and clinical endpoint dates, and either vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and/or influenza or unvaccinated. Cox regression assessed the vaccines' effectiveness in reducing 90-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. Of 4,283,391 registered cases, 2,636 were eCoV infections. Influenza vaccination, primarily inactivated formulations, was associated with a 39% lower mortality hazard. Conversely, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed no significant mortality reduction. This disparity may stem from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines targeting the spike protein, which differs markedly from eCoV spike proteins, limiting cross-protection. In contrast, inactivated influenza vaccines may reduce eCoV mortality through trained innate immunity and cross-reactive cellular responses, offering broader protective effects against these viruses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2516314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2516314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endemic coronaviruses (eCoVs) cause the common cold in humans, particularly affecting children, the elderly, and individuals with comorbidities, who are prone to infection-related hospitalization. While vaccination remains the most effective preventative strategy against infections, vaccines against eCoVs are not available. This study investigates the association between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination and reduced eCoV-related mortality risk. Data from Brazil's nationwide hospital database included patients PCR-positive for one of four eCoV strains, with known admission and clinical endpoint dates, and either vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and/or influenza or unvaccinated. Cox regression assessed the vaccines' effectiveness in reducing 90-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. Of 4,283,391 registered cases, 2,636 were eCoV infections. Influenza vaccination, primarily inactivated formulations, was associated with a 39% lower mortality hazard. Conversely, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed no significant mortality reduction. This disparity may stem from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines targeting the spike protein, which differs markedly from eCoV spike proteins, limiting cross-protection. In contrast, inactivated influenza vaccines may reduce eCoV mortality through trained innate immunity and cross-reactive cellular responses, offering broader protective effects against these viruses.

SARS-CoV-2和流感疫苗接种对地方性冠状病毒相关死亡率的影响:巴西的一项回顾性队列研究
地方性冠状病毒(eCoVs)在人类中引起普通感冒,特别是影响儿童、老年人和有合并症的个体,他们容易因感染而住院。虽然疫苗接种仍然是预防感染的最有效策略,但目前尚无针对ecov的疫苗。本研究调查了SARS-CoV-2与流感疫苗接种和降低ecov相关死亡风险之间的关系。来自巴西全国医院数据库的数据包括四种eCoV毒株之一pcr阳性的患者,已知入院和临床终点日期,并且接种了SARS-CoV-2和/或流感疫苗或未接种疫苗。Cox回归评估了疫苗在降低90天住院全因死亡率方面的有效性。在4,283,391例登记病例中,2,636例为eCoV感染。流感疫苗接种(主要是灭活制剂)与死亡率降低39%相关。相反,接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗没有显着降低死亡率。这种差异可能源于SARS-CoV-2疫苗靶向刺突蛋白,这与eCoV刺突蛋白明显不同,限制了交叉保护。相比之下,灭活流感疫苗可以通过训练的先天免疫和交叉反应性细胞反应降低eCoV死亡率,对这些病毒提供更广泛的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
489
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信