Role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Maryam Salimi, Shokoufeh Khanzadeh, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Arshin Ghaedi, Austin V Stone
{"title":"Role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maryam Salimi, Shokoufeh Khanzadeh, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Arshin Ghaedi, Austin V Stone","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.106145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) involves low-grade inflammation. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may serve as a simple biomarker, but its role in OA remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review the existing scientific literature on the role of NLR in OA, a classic age-related disorder, to perform a meta-analysis of the available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic databases PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to March 1, 2024. The inclusion criteria were retrospective and prospective case-control studies involving human subjects with OA and healthy controls. The included studies needed to provide NLR levels for both OA patients and healthy controls and perform a comparative analysis of NLR levels between these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the PRISMA guidelines, fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis after multiple screenings. The pooled results demonstrated a significant overall elevation of NLR in OA patients compared to healthy controls. (standardized mean difference = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.75, <i>P</i> = 0.03). However, the subgroup analysis shows no significant differences in NLR levels when considering study design (retrospective <i>vs</i> prospective) and OA severity (severe <i>vs</i> mild-moderate). This suggests variability and potential limitations in using NLR as a consistent marker across different study types and OA severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that OA patients have higher NLR than healthy individuals. However, NLR did not significantly differ by study type or disease severity, suggesting its limited use in indicating OA severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 5","pages":"106145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.106145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) involves low-grade inflammation. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may serve as a simple biomarker, but its role in OA remains unclear.

Aim: To review the existing scientific literature on the role of NLR in OA, a classic age-related disorder, to perform a meta-analysis of the available data.

Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to March 1, 2024. The inclusion criteria were retrospective and prospective case-control studies involving human subjects with OA and healthy controls. The included studies needed to provide NLR levels for both OA patients and healthy controls and perform a comparative analysis of NLR levels between these groups.

Results: According to the PRISMA guidelines, fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis after multiple screenings. The pooled results demonstrated a significant overall elevation of NLR in OA patients compared to healthy controls. (standardized mean difference = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.75, P = 0.03). However, the subgroup analysis shows no significant differences in NLR levels when considering study design (retrospective vs prospective) and OA severity (severe vs mild-moderate). This suggests variability and potential limitations in using NLR as a consistent marker across different study types and OA severity.

Conclusion: Our study found that OA patients have higher NLR than healthy individuals. However, NLR did not significantly differ by study type or disease severity, suggesting its limited use in indicating OA severity.

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比例在骨关节炎中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:骨关节炎(OA)涉及低度炎症。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)可能作为一种简单的生物标志物,但其在OA中的作用尚不清楚。目的:回顾关于NLR在OA(一种典型的年龄相关疾病)中的作用的现有科学文献,并对现有数据进行荟萃分析。方法:系统检索自建校至2024年3月1日的PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus等电子数据库。纳入标准为回顾性和前瞻性病例对照研究,涉及OA患者和健康对照者。纳入的研究需要提供OA患者和健康对照者的NLR水平,并对两组之间的NLR水平进行比较分析。结果:根据PRISMA指南,经过多次筛选,15篇文章被纳入meta分析。综合结果显示,与健康对照相比,OA患者NLR总体显著升高。(标准化平均差= 0.39,95%可信区间:0.03 ~ 0.75,P = 0.03)。然而,亚组分析显示,在考虑研究设计(回顾性与前瞻性)和OA严重程度(重度与轻度-中度)时,NLR水平无显著差异。这表明使用NLR作为不同研究类型和OA严重程度的一致标记的可变性和潜在局限性。结论:我们的研究发现OA患者的NLR高于健康人。然而,NLR在研究类型或疾病严重程度上没有显著差异,表明其在指示OA严重程度方面的应用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信