Tom Dehaemers, Birthe Michiels, Rita Derua, Yves Piette, Carolien Bonroy, Jonas De Leeuw, Doreen Dillaerts, Nele Peersman, Maaike Cockx, Tom De Waal, Pieter Vermeersch, Takashi Matsushita, Vanessa Smith, Jean-Baptiste Vulsteke, Ellen De Langhe, Xavier Bossuyt
{"title":"Detection of Anti-RuvBL1/2 Autoantibodies by Targeted Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Tom Dehaemers, Birthe Michiels, Rita Derua, Yves Piette, Carolien Bonroy, Jonas De Leeuw, Doreen Dillaerts, Nele Peersman, Maaike Cockx, Tom De Waal, Pieter Vermeersch, Takashi Matsushita, Vanessa Smith, Jean-Baptiste Vulsteke, Ellen De Langhe, Xavier Bossuyt","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibodies are found in patients with systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-myositis overlap syndrome. Anti-RuvBL1/2 antibodies recognize conformational epitopes of the RuvBL1/2 complex, which complicates detection by solid phase assays. Here, we propose a method for detection of anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibodies based on liquid phase immunoprecipitation combined with quantification of the precipitated RuvBL1/2 by LC-MS/MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum antibodies of patients (n = 13) and controls (n = 60) were captured by and cross-linked to protein A/G magnetic beads and incubated with HeLa nuclear cell extract. Captured proteins were eluted and digested with trypsin. The digested antigen peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography linked to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) acquisition mode. Detected signals (peak areas) were quantified. Synthetic proteotypic peptides were used for quality control and quantification purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MRM analysis was based on 6 proteotypic peptides (3 for RuvBL1, 3 for RuvBL2) that are unique to each protein. The immunoprecipitation LC-MS/MS MRM approach allowed differentiation between anti-RuvBL1/2 positive and anti-RuvBL1/2 negative samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose an immunoprecipitation-based LC-MS/MS MRM method for anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibody testing. This technology is a promising detection method for autoantibodies targeting conformational epitopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibodies are found in patients with systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-myositis overlap syndrome. Anti-RuvBL1/2 antibodies recognize conformational epitopes of the RuvBL1/2 complex, which complicates detection by solid phase assays. Here, we propose a method for detection of anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibodies based on liquid phase immunoprecipitation combined with quantification of the precipitated RuvBL1/2 by LC-MS/MS.
Methods: Serum antibodies of patients (n = 13) and controls (n = 60) were captured by and cross-linked to protein A/G magnetic beads and incubated with HeLa nuclear cell extract. Captured proteins were eluted and digested with trypsin. The digested antigen peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography linked to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) acquisition mode. Detected signals (peak areas) were quantified. Synthetic proteotypic peptides were used for quality control and quantification purposes.
Results: The MRM analysis was based on 6 proteotypic peptides (3 for RuvBL1, 3 for RuvBL2) that are unique to each protein. The immunoprecipitation LC-MS/MS MRM approach allowed differentiation between anti-RuvBL1/2 positive and anti-RuvBL1/2 negative samples.
Conclusions: We propose an immunoprecipitation-based LC-MS/MS MRM method for anti-RuvBL1/2 autoantibody testing. This technology is a promising detection method for autoantibodies targeting conformational epitopes.