Effectiveness and safety of blonanserin monotherapy for first-episode schizophrenia with and without prominent negative symptoms: A prospective study.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Li-He Chen, Qian Guo, Yao Hu, Xiao-Hua Liu, Hao Hu, Hai-Ying Chen, Cai-Ping Liu, Hua-Fang Li, Jin-Dong Chen, Guan-Jun Li
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of blonanserin monotherapy for first-episode schizophrenia with and without prominent negative symptoms: A prospective study.","authors":"Li-He Chen, Qian Guo, Yao Hu, Xiao-Hua Liu, Hao Hu, Hai-Ying Chen, Cai-Ping Liu, Hua-Fang Li, Jin-Dong Chen, Guan-Jun Li","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.103701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blonanserin, a novel antipsychotic, has demonstrated efficacy in treating both positive and negative symptoms. However, limited research exists on its dose-dependent effectiveness and safety in patients with and without prominent negative symptoms (PNS).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of blonanserin monotherapy for first-episode schizophrenia in real-world clinical settings and to explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of blonanserin for patients with PNS and without PNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-week, multicenter, prospective post-marketing surveillance was conducted. In this study, we included patients with first-episode schizophrenia who received blonanserin monotherapy. Patients were divided into those with PNS and without PNS, based on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) negative symptoms subscale scores. Additionally, patients were labeled as high-dose and low-dose groups according to the maximum daily dose they received. Effectiveness was assessed using the BPRS, and safety was evaluated through the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 653 patients were included in the analysis, with 613 completing the study. The BPRS total score decreased significantly from 47.94 ± 16.31 at baseline to 26.88 ± 9.47 at 12 weeks (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant interaction of PNS × dose × time was observed for BPRS total scores (<i>F</i> = 3.47, <i>P</i> = 0.040) and negative symptom subscale scores (<i>F</i> = 6.76, <i>P</i> = 0.002). In the PNS group, the high-dose group showed greater reductions in BPRS total scores (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and negative symptom subscale scores (<i>P</i> = 0.003) than the low-dose group in week 12. In the without PNS group, no significant difference was observed between the high-dose and low-dose groups at any visit. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate, with extrapyramidal symptoms (9.3%) being most common; 1.5% of patients gained ≥ 7% body weight at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blonanserin effectively alleviated the clinical symptoms of first-episode schizophrenia with an acceptable safety profile. High-dose blonanserin is particularly beneficial for patients with PNS in the acute phase of first-episode schizophrenia. However, due to the limitation of ADR reporting the real world, the ADR incidence observed in this study may be underestimated.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 5","pages":"103701"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.103701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blonanserin, a novel antipsychotic, has demonstrated efficacy in treating both positive and negative symptoms. However, limited research exists on its dose-dependent effectiveness and safety in patients with and without prominent negative symptoms (PNS).

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of blonanserin monotherapy for first-episode schizophrenia in real-world clinical settings and to explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of blonanserin for patients with PNS and without PNS.

Methods: A 12-week, multicenter, prospective post-marketing surveillance was conducted. In this study, we included patients with first-episode schizophrenia who received blonanserin monotherapy. Patients were divided into those with PNS and without PNS, based on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) negative symptoms subscale scores. Additionally, patients were labeled as high-dose and low-dose groups according to the maximum daily dose they received. Effectiveness was assessed using the BPRS, and safety was evaluated through the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results: A total of 653 patients were included in the analysis, with 613 completing the study. The BPRS total score decreased significantly from 47.94 ± 16.31 at baseline to 26.88 ± 9.47 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). A significant interaction of PNS × dose × time was observed for BPRS total scores (F = 3.47, P = 0.040) and negative symptom subscale scores (F = 6.76, P = 0.002). In the PNS group, the high-dose group showed greater reductions in BPRS total scores (P = 0.001) and negative symptom subscale scores (P = 0.003) than the low-dose group in week 12. In the without PNS group, no significant difference was observed between the high-dose and low-dose groups at any visit. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate, with extrapyramidal symptoms (9.3%) being most common; 1.5% of patients gained ≥ 7% body weight at 12 weeks.

Conclusion: Blonanserin effectively alleviated the clinical symptoms of first-episode schizophrenia with an acceptable safety profile. High-dose blonanserin is particularly beneficial for patients with PNS in the acute phase of first-episode schizophrenia. However, due to the limitation of ADR reporting the real world, the ADR incidence observed in this study may be underestimated.

布朗那色林单药治疗伴有或不伴有显著阴性症状的首发精神分裂症的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性研究
背景:布兰色林是一种新型抗精神病药物,对阳性和阴性症状均有疗效。然而,关于其在有或无明显阴性症状(PNS)患者中的剂量依赖性有效性和安全性的研究有限。目的:评价布隆那色林单药治疗现实世界首发精神分裂症的有效性和安全性,探讨不同剂量布隆那色林对有PNS和无PNS患者的疗效和安全性。方法:进行为期12周、多中心、前瞻性的上市后监测。在这项研究中,我们纳入了接受布朗那色林单药治疗的首发精神分裂症患者。根据简短精神病学评定量表(BPRS)阴性症状亚量表得分,将患者分为有PNS和无PNS两组。此外,根据患者接受的最大日剂量,将患者标记为高剂量组和低剂量组。采用BPRS评价疗效,通过药物不良反应(adr)发生率评价安全性。结果:共纳入653例患者,其中613例完成研究。BPRS总评分由基线时的47.94±16.31降至12周时的26.88±9.47 (P < 0.001)。PNS ×剂量×时间对BPRS总分(F = 3.47, P = 0.040)和阴性症状亚量表评分(F = 6.76, P = 0.002)存在显著的交互作用。在PNS组中,高剂量组在第12周BPRS总分(P = 0.001)和阴性症状亚量表评分(P = 0.003)的下降幅度大于低剂量组。在无PNS组,高剂量组和低剂量组在任何访问时均未观察到显著差异。大多数不良反应为轻度或中度,以锥体外系症状(9.3%)最为常见;1.5%的患者在12周时体重增加≥7%。结论:勃兰色林可有效缓解首发精神分裂症患者的临床症状,安全性可接受。高剂量勃兰色林对首发精神分裂症急性期PNS患者特别有益。然而,由于现实世界中ADR报告的局限性,本研究中观察到的ADR发生率可能被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信